Automox vs Check Point Harmony Endpoint comparison

Automox and Check Point Software Technologies are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Automox is ranked #61, while Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.7. Automox holds a 0.3% mindshare in EPP, compared to Check Point Software Technologies’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Automox users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Check Point Software Technologies users who would recommend it.

Automox

Read 10 Automox reviews

509 Views
383 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Check Point Harmony Endpoint

Read 117 Check Point Harmony Endpoint reviews

7,945 Views
4,905 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Automox

Check Point Harmony Endpoint

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Check Point Harmony Endpoint and Automox offer unique solutions for endpoint security and system management. Automox has the upper hand in system management due to its automation features, while Check Point Harmony Endpoint leads in threat prevention capabilities.

Features: Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers comprehensive threat prevention, advanced detection capabilities, and detailed reporting tools. Automox is known for its automation features, effective vulnerability management, and user-friendly patch and update management.

Room for Improvement: Check Point Harmony Endpoint could improve its integration features, reduce resource consumption, and enhance user interface design. Automox could benefit from more detailed reporting options, improved remediation features, and additional customization capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point Harmony Endpoint is praised for its straightforward deployment process and strong customer support. Automox is commended for its quick implementation and responsive support team.

Pricing and ROI: Check Point Harmony Endpoint is seen as a high-value investment with a solid return on investment, although some users find the setup cost high. Automox is praised for its cost-effectiveness and high ROI, making it a preferred choice for budget-conscious users.

To learn more, read our detailed Automox vs. Check Point Harmony Endpoint Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Automox vs. Check Point Harmony Endpoint

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,371 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automox

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

61st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (49th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (18th), Patch Management (14th)

Check Point Harmony Endpoint

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

8th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

117

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Automox is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Check Point Harmony Endpoint is 2.3%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Jack Leung

EMEA Senior Systems Engineer at Quaker Chemical Corporation

Easy to use and deploy agents but needs more stability

We just need to deploy the agent to the endpoints. We don't need to set up anything. For a single agent, it takes one or two minutes. However, we deployed globally, and you need to take into consideration the time it will take to deploy across each endpoint. It's very simple to deploy. We had three or four engineers take care of the implementation.

Read full review

Alejandro Flores.

Director de Ingenieria at Smartelecom SA de CV

Good visibility with cloud centralized management and several layers of security

There are some "weak points" that have to be mentioned, including: 1) If the IT department is used to "cloning" endpoints (making images) you are going to have a hard time trying to install the product and you are going to end up reading a lot of Check Point documents. 2) If you are used to the granularity of roles features in Check Point Quantums products you are going to be a little bit disappointed. You can't set customized roles with customized read/write permissions. 3) You need a mature security team to manage this solution in order to get the most value from it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Among the most valuable features are its ease of use and the Worklets. Both of them are time-savers. Worklets enable us to customize things for a given environment. It's something like when Apple lets other people create applications. Other peoples' Worklets can be used in our environment and in our customers' environments. That saves a lot of time, and it's really cool."

"It's easy to deploy agents to endpoints."

"They've been adding some new features lately, which I'm not nearly as familiar with, but the ability to just deploy patches and exempt certain machines from certain patches is helpful. For instance, for our servers, we may not want to roll out zero-day patches. We are able to exempt those and make sure that they don't get those policies. We've got certain servers that have to run a particular version of Java, and being able to exempt those servers from receiving Java updates is pretty fantastic."

"Its flexibility is most valuable."

"The biggest improvement to our organization involves the reduction in its man hours... We've probably saved hundreds of hours."

"Coming from prior solutions that were a lot more effort, Automox's patch management abilities are transformational. When I took over patching at my company, they were using on-premise architecture to patch. As the workforce shifted from being in the office into their home offices, I was able to lift and shift with no effort other than deploying the new agent out into the environment."

"The flexibility in creating tools to make changes on remote machines is most valuable to me. The reporting feature is also fantastic because on any given day I can bring up a list of machines that don't have patches, for example. Or I can bring up a list of machines that are in my environment on a certain day. The solution helps me with not only my own role, and what I look for internally myself, but it also helps during audits. I can go in and look at the number of machines in there, and their owners and timelines. It certainly helps tell a story for anything that IT requires."

"The fact that it's just one product that can patch multiple operating systems is really great."

More Automox pros

"The most valuable feature of Check Point Harmony Endpoint is it can be used for all kinds of endpoints, including mobile phones."

"The most valuable feature is the integration with CheckPoint's firewalls. You can have one port, and follow the logs from both Endpoint and firewall security."

"I use Check Point Harmony Endpoint because it is an easy solution to implement and a good solution overall."

"It's pretty complete for preventing threats to endpoints. Its capabilities are great."

"The level of security and visibility they provide is great and it is very easy to configure and maintain."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"Check Point Harmony Endpoint can be easily deployed and is cost effective and more secure."

"The best thing is that it fits into all environments, which gives any organization a chance to use it intuitively without worrying about the nature of their industry."

More Check Point Harmony Endpoint pros

Cons

"As concerns the patching concepts, there's a bit of a learning curve in terms of working out how Automox wants you to work within the console, not only splitting up everything into groups, but then having the various policies assigned."

"When we bring on a new client, we need to go into that client and manually set up my account, my chief engineer's account, three technicians' accounts, and a billing person's account all over again, which is annoying. We have probably up to 15 or 16 of our clients on Automox now. For every single one of those, we have had to go in and set this up. Then, if anything changes, we have to remember to go to Automox and change it 15 or 16 times. So, we just want inheritable permissions, and that is it. We have talked to them about this, and they are like, "Yeah, we hear a lot of complaints about it." I am thinking, "Guys, I have been complaining about this for a year and a half. When are you going to do it?" It must be some tricky thing or not an easy fix, because I can only assume if it were easy, then they would have done it by now."

"The only thing that we've ever truly wanted is an onsite repository. Currently, all updates are provided directly from the internet. So, if you have 1,000 devices, all 1,000 devices go directly out to the internet. We would love the option of being able to put the updates on local storage so that we're not consuming as much bandwidth. That is literally the only thing that we've ever wanted."

"The stability has come a long way from what it was like when it started and now it's really good."

"The biggest area they need to fix, without a doubt, is the ability to copy and sync profiles and worklets between all of the organizations you manage, and the ability to have top-level user access control across all of the companies that you manage."

"It should have integrated workstation access. So, there should be a remote desktop feature."

"We would like to see additional detailed reporting for Service providers like us. We had to build our own reports via their APIs to meet our needs."

"Asset management would be a great feature to add to Automox. We would run easier scripts or more out of the box scripts that would help us in audits. \"

More Automox cons

"Sometimes, the Cloud Management Portal can become unresponsive or take a long time to process a query. This in turn will cause the browser to freeze, which will require closing and reopening of your browser."

"The heartbeat interval must be improved."

"Support's service and the response times can be improved. The triaging of the tickets takes a long time and the tickets are only resolved with escalations."

"There are still functionalities that I have not been able to fully test and I would like to spend more time using the tool before offering an opinion to the IT Central community on this point."

"The application control and URL filtering features are not very strong."

"It's not easy to investigate an incident that you find in the company. Users often face trouble when downloading files, so it is very slow in terms of how it works."

"If you're using an endpoint that does not have sufficient resources, it would be very tough to use."

"Sometimes the portal loads slowly which should be improved."

More Check Point Harmony Endpoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are on the premium licensing, which is the one that has the API capability that we use."

"The pricing and licensing costs have been great for us... My advice to others who are evaluating or thinking of implementing Automox is to give it a shot. If a free trial is still available, definitely use it, because it makes life a lot easier."

"For all these software tools, it is usually a subscription model. There is a monthly charge that we need to pass along to our clients because we are doing all this for their benefit. It is only a couple of bucks a month per computer, and that is a low enough price point where our clients, without exception, have accepted it, and said, "This is great. We will pay that. It sounds like a worthwhile thing.""

"The product is a great value."

"The cost is very reasonable compared to the competition."

"We're doing it annually directly through Automox. It is per endpoint. It is $2 and some change per endpoint, but I believe the cost is right around $28,000. Everything is covered in this fee."

"Automox just charges us a set amount per user, per month, for using the product. That is very important to us. Because it's a cloud-native solution, you're saving on the cost of hosting an on-premises solution on your servers."

"There are no additional costs in addition to the extended licensing fees with Automox. You get your support and your per endpoint license with what you purchased."

More Automox pricing and cost advice

"We pay roughly 80,000 Swedish krona per year. When it comes to the firewall, it's roughly 150,000 Swedish krona yearly. There's also maintenance, of course, which is roughly 10,000 krona per month."

"In addition to the standard licensing fees, there is a cost for support."

"Check Point Harmony Endpoint is an expensive solution. My company's clients pay INR 1,000 for each user of the product, while Check Point also provides an option to pay INR 2,300 for three years."

"I bought them for 12 months and I genuinely cannot remember what I paid for them. I think it's about 100 pounds per user per year, so about 10 pounds a month per person."

"The product is averagely priced. The product price is neither very high nor too low. The tool is not really expensive."

"The cost is huge compared to other products that are available on market."

"The tool’s cost has increased by almost 300% in two years."

"One of the key factors that made us go with this solution was the pricing. On the licensing part, there was an initial complementary set of licenses offered in the initial onboarding package, either 15 or 20. Then, we had some complementary licenses in the initial purchase of the package. That was pretty useful."

More Check Point Harmony Endpoint pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Government

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Check Point Harmony Endpoint?

The platform's most valuable features are the ability to build API, which meets our business requirements, and the VPN client, which provides VPN access from a single client.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point Harmony Endpoint?

The price for Check Point Harmony Endpoint ( /products/check-point-harmony-endpoint-reviews ) is good considering the services it offers. It is not expensive and provides comprehensive coverage.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Check Point Harmony Endpoint?

One area that requires improvement is the amount of audit logs the system can save, as it is currently limited to fourteen days.

See all answers

Comparisons

Tanium vs Automox

Compared 19% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Automox

Compared 18% of the time

NinjaOne vs Automox

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Automox

Compared 9% of the time

BigFix vs Automox

Compared 8% of the time

More Automox Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Check Point Harmony Endpoint

Compared 13% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Check Point Harmony Endpoint

Compared 8% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point Harmony Endpoint

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Check Point Harmony Endpoint

Compared 7% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Check Point Harmony Endpoint

Compared 5% of the time

More Check Point Harmony Endpoint Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automox

May 2025

Download Automox product report

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Harmony Endpoint

May 2025

Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint product report

Also Known As

No data available

Check Point Endpoint Security, Endpoint Security, Check Point SandBlast Agent

Overview

Facing growing threats and a rapidly expanding attack surface, understaffed and alert-fatigued organizations need more efficient ways to eliminate their exposure to vulnerabilities. Automox is a modern cyber hygiene platform that closes the aperture of attack by more than 80% with just half the effort of traditional solutions.

Cloud-based and globally available, Automox enforces OS & third-party patch management, security configurations, and custom scripting across Windows, Mac, and Linux from a single intuitive console. IT and SecOps can quickly gain control and share visibility of on-prem, remote and virtual endpoints without the need to deploy costly infrastructure.

Automox dramatically reduces corporate risk while raising operational efficiency to deliver best-in-class security outcomes, faster and with fewer resources.

Automox

Check Point Harmony Endpoint integrates security solutions, allowing comprehensive protection against cyber threats. It's designed to suit enterprise-scale operations with robust features for threat prevention and management.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers advanced security capabilities that prioritize threat analysis, detection, and prevention. Tailored for professional environments, it provides tools to handle endpoint vulnerabilities effectively. Its user-centric design ensures that IT teams can manage network security with streamlined operations. Continuous updates and threat intelligence are offered to counter emerging threats, and its deployment is optimized for ease of use.

What are the key features of Check Point Harmony Endpoint?

Threat Intelligence: Delivers real-time insights into new and existing threats.
Forensics: Offers detailed analysis of incidents to understand and mitigate risks.
Endpoint Threat Hunting: Empowers proactive search for advanced threats.
Automated Response: Integrates response mechanisms to reduce incident impact.
Zero Trust Architecture: Implements controls for verified access at every endpoint.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational costs by minimizing security breaches.
Enhanced Security: Protects data integrity and privacy across endpoints.
User Productivity: Limits interruptions and maintains business continuity.
Scalability: Grows with organizational needs without compromising on performance.
Compliance Assurance: Aids in meeting regulatory and security compliance standards.

In specific industries like finance and healthcare, Check Point Harmony Endpoint is deployed to secure sensitive data and protect against sector-specific threats. Its flexibility allows adaptation to meet industry standards, ensuring critical infrastructures maintain operational security without hindrance.

Check Point Software Technologies

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Boston Properties, Independence Care System, Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre (MCEC), Courtagen Life Sciences, Carmel Partners

Buyer's Guide

Automox vs. Check Point Harmony Endpoint

April 2025

Free Report: Automox vs. Check Point Harmony Endpoint

Find out what your peers are saying about Automox vs. Check Point Harmony Endpoint and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Automox vs. Check Point Harmony Endpoint report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.