We performed a comparison between Aruba Networks Wireless WAN and Ubiquiti Wireless based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is stable and good."
"I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."
"What I like most about Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is seamless integration from an endpoint perspective. Another valuable feature of the product is that it supports certificate-based authentication."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the streaming of screen sharing."
"The solution is overall a great product. The stability is one of the best aspects of it. It's also useful in helping control multiple access points. You don't need to have a physical controller like other brands."
"The product keeps up with leading-edge technology so we have dependability and scalability."
"It’s very stable and reliable."
"I like the solution's ability to add multiple SSIDs on different levels such as enterprise and guest networks."
"It offers very good pricing."
"Ubiquiti Wireless is extremely easy to set up."
"The range is usually pretty good, which is the most important thing to use because more or less, all wireless access points are the same."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of setup."
"I like that it's cheaper and inexpensive. It's also easy to use."
"The stability and performance are great."
"The most valuable feature of Ubiquiti Wireless is the ease of configuration."
"We have not had an issue with Ubiquiti Wireless since we have been using it. The solution is highly reliable."
"This solution needs different models that are more specialized for certain customers."
"The product should improve Aruba Central."
"Device integration has room for improvement in Aruba Networks Wireless WAN."
"The solution currently has a Windows update problem."
"The initial setup has a lot of options, which makes it very versatile yet very complicated to install. There should be two modes: a basic mode and then a more advanced mode to help make implementation easier. Most of the time, if it's a small installation, you don't need the complexity. You shouldn't need higher expertise in order to install a couple of access points in a single place."
"In a meshed environment, the handoff between access points is sometimes not smooth when users are mobile. For example, a connection is occasionally interrupted when a user takes their laptop from the gym to the cafeteria."
"Its technical support service could be better."
"The issue is that we are unable to update it because we lack the necessary permissions. We set up the website, but we don't have permission to download the software."
"They have access points that are in the firewalls, and I believe the firewalls could be significantly better. They use the USG firewall, which I believe is a poor device. VPNs for example, it is really bad, it is difficult to configure, and I don't like them at all."
"In Ukraine at least, it's a problem when it comes to buying the hardware. For example, I made a request for 20 switches a few months ago. The solution needs to have worldwide availability."
"I would like to see this solution have any kind of captive portal on the tool or user accounting tool. This would be quite useful for companies."
"I would like a better explanation or better documentation on how to use the onboard spectrum analyzer."
"The network setup could be a little easier and more straightforward."
"The strength of the routers could be improved. When it comes to serious routing, the solution doesn't measure up to the big guys like Juniper and Cisco, but we don't expect it to."
"The production is not very stable in our experience."
"There should be an easier way to contact the support. If we need to do something on it, it will be easier and faster if there is a support number to call. Currently, their support is mostly through email or chat. If there is a hotline that you can call directly, that would be good. It will really help a lot. They should also include more after-sales support. They can maybe also provide more details on what's happening with the network."
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 5th in Wireless WAN with 46 reviews while Ubiquiti Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless WAN with 67 reviews. Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.4, while Ubiquiti Wireless is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN writes "It's reliable, cost-effective, and easy to troubleshoot". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti Wireless writes "It's cheap and easy to use but isn't suitable for large deployments or complex use cases ". Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Fortinet FortiWLM, whereas Ubiquiti Wireless is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Aruba Wireless and Cisco Wireless WAN. See our Aruba Networks Wireless WAN vs. Ubiquiti Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.