Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 2, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.0
Arctic Wolf provides valuable, proactive security by reducing risks, ensuring efficiency, and preventing system downtime with effective training initiatives.
Sentiment score
6.9
Cortex XSOAR enhances ROI by automating tasks, requiring mature SOC processes for effective use and reduced false positives.
Employee engagement is high, with a 96% viewing and participation rate for their training materials.
We are positioning Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, which can be used in the SOC and do a lot of automation for the customer.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.3
Arctic Wolf's customer service is highly rated for responsiveness and excellent 24/7 technical support, ensuring positive experiences.
Sentiment score
6.4
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR support is responsive and skilled, though experiences vary with occasional delays and access issues.
We have monthly meetings where they help us with network security.
The technical support provided by Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is good.
Their support has been better than Anomali's and they are more responsive.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Arctic Wolf offers scalable, cost-effective security solutions with customizable alerts and seamless integration, ideal for diverse organization sizes.
Sentiment score
7.3
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is praised for scalability and integration, handling enterprise demands with careful large deployment planning.
The scalability of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR supports our growth and security needs because we can integrate various tools and continuously add more capability.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.6
Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is highly stable, offering reliable performance with minimal downtime and robust 24/7 services.
Sentiment score
7.5
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is stable and reliable, with occasional bugs and performance issues, especially in cloud environments.
 

Room For Improvement

Arctic Wolf MDR needs better tool integration, user education, simpler licensing, improved dashboards, and reduced false alerts.
Cortex XSOAR requires improved documentation, expanded IoT support, enhanced features, and better pricing for streamlined integration and user experience.
The threat intelligence feature is expected to be a significant advantage.
We cannot fully secure these devices until they release an updated version of their agent software.
To improve the solution, it needs to have complete features that are low-code, no-code, and should be plug-and-play.
One of the significant issues we encounter is system slowdown when we receive an influx of alerts, which inhibits how quickly we can access the information needed for investigation.
Deployment is not easy, requiring significant tuning and building of integrations over weeks.
 

Setup Cost

Arctic Wolf's pricing is higher but offers extensive features and flexibility, valued for comprehensive enterprise security without hidden fees.
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is costly but offers valuable integration and features, appealing to medium and large enterprises.
The pricing is okay and comparable to other solutions, with competitive pricing obtained for most options.
For customers, it is zero versus $20 million, which is why they have to make a decision.
 

Valuable Features

Arctic Wolf provides cost-effective 24/7 security with integration, user-friendly dashboard, and comprehensive threat detection and management.
Cortex XSOAR excels in integration, automation, and customization, enhancing security operations with efficient orchestration and high user satisfaction.
The solution works well for our team as it offers a hands-off approach, which we need.
The asset scanning feature and the entire solution, especially their advanced threat protection recently released, are very effective.
We have implemented automation features, such as automated responses to email threats and automatic configuration of target devices for blocking specific IPs.
Execution of automatic tasks for collecting, enriching, and correlating security events from hundreds of different technologies.
If I already have an established process, I do not have to change my process to fit into the tool. I can modify the tool to fit into my process, which makes things considerably easier.
 

Categories and Ranking

Arctic Wolf Managed Detecti...
Ranking in SOC as a Service
1st
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Managed Detection and Response (MDR) (4th)
Palo Alto Networks Cortex X...
Ranking in SOC as a Service
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
48
Ranking in other categories
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the SOC as a Service category, the mindshare of Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is 30.9%, down from 31.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is 15.7%, down from 18.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
SOC as a Service Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response30.9%
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR15.7%
Other53.400000000000006%
SOC as a Service
 

Featured Reviews

Kimberly Brock - PeerSpot reviewer
Real-time threat detection has improved with comprehensive asset scanning
The threat intelligence feature is expected to be a significant advantage. However, a section for software inventory and real-time comparison with current CVEs would be beneficial. One can review an inventory of assets being scanned, including a software inventory along with CVE updates based on a company's software subscriptions, would be a game changer.
DayaramGoyal - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers automation but requires enhancements for intuitive configuration
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is a good product with enhanced and efficient playbooks, as demonstrated during our use case simulations. We have implemented automation features, such as automated responses to email threats and automatic configuration of target devices for blocking specific IPs. The analytics feature in Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is impressive. The solution is quite exhaustive regarding integrations, with many pre-integrations available, especially for market-leading products. There might be challenges with make-in-India products, as they tend not to build the necessary connectors. This depends on whether you are selling to enterprises or other customers. For government customers, you might encounter many Indian products, such as firewalls, which could pose integration challenges unless you have open APIs. However, for market-leading products, there are ready-made integrations available.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which SOC as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
Healthcare Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise1
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise24
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response?
The agents give pretty good visibility into what is happening at the endpoint.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response?
The pricing is okay and comparable to other solutions, with competitive pricing obtained for most options. We value the ease of use and hands-off approach.
What needs improvement with Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response?
The only frustrating aspect is the lack of support for Windows on ARM devices. We cannot fully secure these devices until they release an updated version of their agent software.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR?
Comparing pricing to Micro Focus, they were offering bundles, making it free with their SIEM. For customers, it is zero versus $20 million, which is why they have to make a decision.
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR?
To improve the solution, it needs to have complete features that are low-code, no-code, and should be plug-and-play. We need to see improvements in that area to facilitate cyber analysts.
 

Also Known As

Arctic Wolf AWN CyberSOC
Demisto Enterprise, Cortex XSOAR, Demisto
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Agero, Madison Memorial Hospital, DLZ, Howard LLP, City of Sparks
Cellcom Israel, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City, esri, Cylance, Flatiron Health, Veeva, ADT Cybersecurity
Find out what your peers are saying about Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.