No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

ArcSight Security Orchestration Automation Response vs Securonix Next-Gen SIEM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ArcSight Security Orchestra...
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
86th
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
16th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (10th), AI Security (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of ArcSight Security Orchestration Automation Response is 0.2%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Securonix Next-Gen SIEM is 1.4%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM1.4%
ArcSight Security Orchestration Automation Response0.2%
Other98.4%
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
 

Featured Reviews

Gaurav Ranade - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO at Rah Infotech Pvt Ltd
Supports automation and orchestration workflows but has lost market traction recently
The data correlation feature in ArcSight Security Orchestration Automation Response helps to improve incident response times, but I believe that there are many other things that need to be done. The competition is coming up with new jargons and new features that need to be taken into account. I believe that ArcSight Security Orchestration Automation Response also has to change the user experience slightly to a phase-based view, which seems to be slightly dull, and many times customers or partners have reported this back. The UI could be slightly better and that is an area for improvement. ArcSight Security Orchestration Automation Response is taking an edge lesser than the competition. When I look at that, there is Splunk, Exabeam, Gurucul, Securonix, and others that are taking quite a leverage in the market. Three or four years ago, the market ratio was about 40 to 45% captured by ArcSight Security Orchestration Automation Response, but now it has been reduced to 10 to 12%. As much as the competition needs to be evaluated on the functionality perspective, I think ArcSight Security Orchestration Automation Response is losing its ground, so it needs to buckle up.
reviewer1375044 - PeerSpot reviewer
Assistant VP, Idm Compliance at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Centralized environment supports big data while facing integration challenges
The customization in Securonix Next-Gen SIEM is more difficult compared to other solutions. At the operation level, we are not facing many challenges with automating things using Securonix Next-Gen SIEM, but at the admin level, we have many challenges where log parsing is causing issues and compatibility is not present. The primary technology challenge we have is not at the security tools level. For example, firewall Cisco and others are capable. However, specific to product, for SAP, we are using certain products, and developing custom connectors for each product, especially the internal applications, is difficult, and Securonix Next-Gen SIEM is not up to the mark.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The advanced analytics in ArcSight Security Orchestration Automation Response helps to improve threat detection accuracy, which is an added advantage with the advanced analytics that ArcSight Security Orchestration Automation Response platform provides, which many times the competition cannot do."
"I rate the technical support a nine out of ten. They're friendly. Whenever we have a P1 issue, we write an email and our issue is resolved in one or two hours."
"The most valuable feature is being able to look at users' behavioral profiles to see what they typically access. One of the key events that we monitor is people's downloading of objects... It's very easy to see people's patterns, what they typically do."
"One of the valuable features of Securonix is the auto-incident creation, which was not available two or three years ago."
"Risk scoring was nice. We could exactly see which user had the highest risk score, and then we could pick it up and work on it."
"[The solution has] incident-management or case-management functionality. If someone were to download a high number and we decided we needed to investigate it, I could open a case right in the tool. It would be able to directly reference the data that they downloaded and we could open and shut the case directly in the tool, as well as report from it."
"One of the most valuable features it has is the thread chaining. One of the common issues that we always had was the number of anomalies that we used to get and the number of alerts that we used to get. But with this approach of thread chaining, we've found the false-positive rate has decreased very significantly. That was something that we never could have achieved before."
"The software includes user behavior interactions, dashboards, and training capabilities."
"Most of our security is running on Securonix; it's the backbone of our security so we are running quite a lot on it."
 

Cons

"ArcSight Security Orchestration Automation Response is taking an edge lesser than the competition."
"The technical support of the solution is an area with shortcomings and needs improvement."
"We would like a little more face-to-face training. Securonix has several tutorials on its website, but we want there to be a person in Colombia who does training or workshops to give us a better understanding of the platform."
"Parsing needs to be improved. Every time we integrate a new, specific data source, we face a lot of problems in parsing, even for the old data source."
"When dealing with a large amount of data, such as when firewall logs increase, queries sometimes crash or get stuck."
"Six months ago, if someone asked me about the support, I would say, "Not good.""
"Sometimes, there is instability in the data in terms of the customization of the time. I have sometimes observed discrepancies in the data, which is something they should work on. They should bring more stability to time customization. If we are seeing a particular data, when we change the time zone, there should be the same data. There should not be any discrepancy."
"SIEM could have better integration with other technologies."
"It takes too long to generate Spotter reports. For example, a 90-day report is around 100 megabytes. That takes a while, but a one-day report can be generated in a few seconds. We would be happy if they sped up the process."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"We have an annual license. We pay $200,000 for the base licensing and we pay another $50,000 for the software as a service."
"I had heard that it was much cheaper than Splunk and some of the other tools, and they gave us a nice package with support. They accommodated the number of users and support very well."
"We have a license from our 5.0, so that license just continued. We paid them the extra cloud-hosting costs for a year which were about $300,000."
"We went in on a three-year agreement which has an annual licensing fee, based upon the number of people that we're monitoring. There have not been any additional costs to the standard licensing fees."
"Compared to other brands it seems more affordable to us."
"Licensing is based on events per second (EPS), costing between $50 to $60 per EPS."
"A good thing about Securonix is that they don't charge by volume of data or number of devices... They charge by the number of employees, which is a much more predictable number for me, versus data. Our costs are in the $100,000 range over a three-year subscription."
"Its pricing is quite similar to others and is very competitive. The other solutions have different types of licensing, but when you do the math, it is competitive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
886,174 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise19
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ArcSight Security Orchestration Automation Response?
The data correlation feature in ArcSight Security Orchestration Automation Response helps to improve incident response times, but I believe that there are many other things that need to be done. Th...
What is your primary use case for ArcSight Security Orchestration Automation Response?
ArcSight Security Orchestration Automation Response is required in most security projects. Whenever there are security operation centers and logs to be ingested and correlated, any event triggered ...
Which is the best SIEM tool for a mid-sized financial services firm: Arcsight or Securonix?
In my market, a lot of financial companies had or have an ArcSight installation. Just because in former times it was pretty good. Now a lot of them are looking for a more effective solution due to ...
What is your primary use case for Securonix Security Analytics?
We work with CrowdStrike, Securonix Next-Gen SIEM, and other cybersecurity products such as Gurucul. We are a service provider and partner of Securonix Next-Gen SIEM. We operate as a reseller of Se...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Securonix Next-Gen SIEM?
The solution is definitely not expensive. It's benchmarked against others in this space, and we haven't received any negative feedback about pricing from customers or prospects.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Securonix Security Analytics
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Dtex Systems, Pfizer, Western Union, Harris, ITG
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, IBM and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM). Updated: March 2026.
886,174 professionals have used our research since 2012.