We performed a comparison between Appian and Tungsten TotalAgility based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The technical support is excellent."
"Technical support has been amazing overall."
"It is really simple to create a new app, and I like the data-centric aspect of the BPM tool."
"The product has a very good mobile app."
"Appian's most valuable features are the quick time it takes to develop for the market. It's easy and faster than other BPM solutions."
"It has created executable requirements and speeds up the SDLC process greatly."
"This is the most complete solution of its kind."
"The low code functionality and being able to get applications faster to customers or to the market are valuable."
"Kofax TotalAgility is a single package. They provide you with OCR capabilities, BPM capabilities, and case manager features."
"Kofax TotalAgility is stable."
"The tool is low code which saves you from a developer."
"Data extraction and auto-classification are great features."
"One feature I like is that it makes the matrix easy for an unstructured document."
"Its integration capabilities are valuable. It has low code/no code features. You have to do minimal coding."
"Kofax TotalAgility is a great design tool for reading handwritten invoices."
"The most valuable features of this solution are automation, ease of billing processes with the process net, and low to no code development."
"If we could calculate the amount of data that will be realized, it would help us a lot."
"The product’s pricing could be improved from the developers' perspective."
"There is no UI customization possible."
"We would like to have more granular control for interface styling."
"Authoring tool is slow to use resulted in limitations on how quickly solutions can be built."
"Lacks integration with other products."
"We'd like improved functionality for testing new devices."
"We would like to see more reduced latency. We would like to make sure that the scale-out factor will be much more as workloads come in."
"Table line item extraction is not possible through Quick Capture."
"Sometimes there isn't enough accuracy when it comes to extracts."
"The product's console version is old. It should also improve its forum."
"Lacks sufficient inbuilt features."
"TotalAgility needs to improve communication with ECMs or other file storage systems because TotalAgility does not have file storage. A good improvement would be to create file storage or integrate with other file storage tools that are currently available."
"Room for improvement would be better OCR functionality in terms of Arabic OCR. There should be better accuracy."
"There needs to be more accessible certification and better pricing."
"Kofax needs to improve the low-code or citizen developers."
Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 56 reviews while Tungsten TotalAgility is ranked 4th in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) with 22 reviews. Appian is rated 8.4, while Tungsten TotalAgility is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten TotalAgility writes "Great with recognition and provides a high level of confidence in terms of extraction capabilities". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Camunda, ServiceNow and Pega BPM, whereas Tungsten TotalAgility is most compared with ABBYY Vantage, OpenText Intelligent Capture, UiPath Document Understanding, Hyland Brainware and Camunda.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.