Apache Web Server vs IBM WebSphere Application Server comparison

Apache Web Server vs. IBM WebSphere Application Server

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache Web Server

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM WebSphere Application S...

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

6th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Server (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of Apache Web Server is 7.0%, down from 11.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM WebSphere Application Server is 4.7%, down from 10.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Infrastructure Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Apache Web Server	7.0%
IBM WebSphere Application Server	4.7%
Other	88.3%

Application Infrastructure

Featured Reviews

Dimitrios Zigkos

Enterprise Architect at Smals vzw

Faced limitations with integration and long-term adaptability but benefited from a lightweight architecture for standalone applications

I find valuable and beneficial the independence that comes with Apache Web Server. You can build a small project using a simple application server without bothering too much about how to manage it. The compatibility with multiple operating systems has helped my operations since most of the time we use Linux. Some systems rely on Windows, but they are few; in the past, Windows was the dominant operating system for mainstream PCs and infrastructure, but not for business. All the companies I worked for had 90% Linux and maybe up to 10% Windows. The initial setup of Apache Web Server was straightforward and okay.

Read full review

Costica Florea

Senior Manager, MW & DB Automation at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Has worked seamlessly in complex clustered environments and supports long-term development efforts

IBM WebSphere Application Server is currently at version 9.0.5.23. In recent months, they released fix 23, as they periodically release fixes. Previously, they frequently increased versions, but now they maintain 9.0.5 with different releases. It's based on Java J2EE 7 and Java SDK 1.8. Oracle announced that 2030 will be the last year when Java SDK 1.8 will be supported. Oracle currently deploys Java 2.x in parallel, with the latest being version 25. The future of IBM WebSphere Application Server remains uncertain since it's based on Java 1.8 and Java 7. I haven't found any white papers or official documentation from IBM outlining their trajectory post-2030.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Apache Web Server can be used as a proxy server"

"The control panel is very easy to navigate. It's similar to most hosting platforms, so it's user-friendly. Once you get used to it, managing your hosting becomes easy, too."

"Apache has proven to be incredibly reliable, and everything has operated smoothly without encountering any issues."

"Apache is a powerful tool with which you can make it do just about anything you need."

"I do find some benefits with Nginx."

"The most significant advantage is the ability to swiftly enable HTTPS services when my DNS is configured correctly."

"The solution is extremely stable; we haven't had any issues with bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze, so it has been reliable."

"The best thing about Apache is that it is open-source, so implementing my platform on-premises is less expansive than other solutions."

More Apache Web Server pros

"The scalability of the product is quite good."

"Security: It is compatible with the latest Java 8 security features, supports FIPS 140-2 and NIST SP 800-53 with strong ciphers and cryptography keys, and supports TLS 1.2 completely. Also, configuring client and server certificates is relatively easy."

"Ease of administration: It has an Integrated Solutions Console, what we call the administrative console, with very detailed configurations and Help pages for each configurable item."

"IBM WebSphere Application Server is the best in terms of scalability and performance, as well as the support for managing distributed transactions."

"IBM WebSphere Application Server is the ultimate product; there is nothing superior to IBM WebSphere Application Server, and while there are other options such as Tomcat, JBoss, and Oracle's solution, IBM WebSphere Application Server stands above them all."

"Starting with version 8, WAS provides a special folder called monitor deployment. Once you put the .war or .ear file in there, it is deployed automatically without human intervention. This greatly helps us in our continuous integration server. Once the deployment binary is ready, we write a script to copy it to that folder and then, voila! The application is up and running and accessible from its context root."

"It integrates well with the Tivoli Federated Identity Management system, which works as a single sign-on mechanism for other e-services that we have shared with other clients."

"IBM WebSphere Application Server is easy to use."

More IBM WebSphere Application Server pros

Cons

"Adding a reverse proxy to Apache Web Server would be a significant improvement."

"Its stability could be better."

"For NGINX, I think it has NGINX Management Suite, which is GUI-based and allows you to manage your configuration via the user interface, but Apache fails to offer such capabilities to users."

"The only thing that gives me a frown about the Apache Web Server is the command-line configuration."

"I want the user interface to be more user-friendly."

"Things change very fast. We're always on the lookout for better approaches and tools. If the solution falls behind, we may have to switch."

"The product's initial setup process could be easier for users."

"By optimizing the infrastructure to allow the webserver to directly handle queries from memory—particularly by prioritizing the storage of queries in memory and processing them through the web server interface—I could potentially cut down the required instances from five hundred to two hundred."

More Apache Web Server cons

"As the license cost is quite expensive, I'm rating it two out of five."

"Installing or configuring a WAS server instance as a Windows Service causes a lot of problems, especially when the server needs credentials to stop."

"Room for improvement would only be in the licensing. As with all IBM products the licensing can be complex and expensive."

"While WebSphere mostly supports IBM HTTP Server (IHS) as the web server plugin, I think it would be beneficial if it also supported Apache and NGINX web servers. That would give customers more flexibility in their choices."

"WebSphere is very cumbersome and not user-friendly. It used to have its own JVM, which presented challenges such as different architecture and memory leaks."

"The main issue we faced was its limited compatibility with non-Java technologies, which can result in difficulty detecting potential bugs and requiring additional integration efforts."

"The support could be a bit more responsive."

"When we run into memory or locking issues, we resort to using third-party tools. However, it would be preferable to have native tools for debugging this type of problem."

More IBM WebSphere Application Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a free-of-cost solution."

"There is no licensing cost for the product."

"The apache software is free, open-source."

"It is an open-source solution."

"We used to pay about $100,000-$120,000 US or somewhere around there. That was a bit cost-prohibitive for us to continue."

"I don't remember the price, but there are no additional costs."

"The price of this product is higher than that of competitors."

"The pricing is a little expensive."

"My company is on a perpetual or permanent license agreement with IBM WebSphere Application Server. There's also a pay-per-use option, but customers rarely choose that option. Most of the customers are on the perpetual license deal that's all-inclusive. As the license cost is quite expensive, I'm rating it two out of five."

"The licensing cost is 1,000 of euros for a 30-year table."

"We pay around $200,000 annually."

"The solution is quite expensive."

More IBM WebSphere Application Server pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

28%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Web Server?

There are no fees associated with the usage of Apache Web Server in my projects. If you want to have support, then there is some cost, but today I do not know how many companies pay for that servic...

What needs improvement with Apache Web Server?

I would like to see improvements in the functionality and core of Apache Web Server, focusing on building an infrastructure that can be resilient and robust enough to handle resource shortages, and...

What is your primary use case for Apache Web Server?

I am currently working with Apache Web Server in my projects because I'm an architect. Some years ago, it was the application server and the web server; it was Apache Daemon and Apache, the web ser...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM WebSphere Application Server?

At Royal Bank, which is a major IBM customer with mainframes and numerous IBM products, they have a specific agreement regarding pricing. The pricing structure for large enterprise customers differ...

What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere Application Server?

What is your primary use case for IBM WebSphere Application Server?

I was part of an application where I integrated IBM WebSphere Application Server with Node.js and Blue Prism. I did a lot of REST applications because at my core, I'm a developer. Currently, I'm an...

NGINX Plus vs Apache Web Server

Comparisons

IIS vs Apache Web Server

Compared 16% of the time

Compared 13% of the time

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs Apache Web Server

Compared 6% of the time

Magic xpa Application Platform vs Apache Web Server

Compared 6% of the time

More Apache Web Server Competitors

NGINX Plus vs IBM WebSphere Application Server

Compared 12% of the time

Tomcat vs IBM WebSphere Application Server

Compared 11% of the time

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs IBM WebSphere Application Server

Compared 7% of the time

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) vs IBM WebSphere Application Server

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Application Server vs IBM WebSphere Application Server

Compared 2% of the time

More IBM WebSphere Application Server Competitors

Product Reports

Apache Web Server

Download Apache Web Server product report

IBM WebSphere Application Server

Download IBM WebSphere Application Server product report

Also Known As

Apache HTTP Server

WebSphere Application Server

Overview

Apache Web Server is a stable, open-source platform known for its cost-effectiveness, multi-platform compatibility, ease of setup, and high security. It supports various web scripting languages and enables HTTPS services, making it a popular choice for many organizations.

Apache Web Server offers extensive features including HTTP server capabilities and modularity. It efficiently handles client requests and is highly flexible, which is why many companies utilize it for hosting applications, developing websites, and more. Community support further enhances its reliability, though improvements like integration with cloud systems such as Kubernetes, a simplified port management, and support for Microsoft's .Net framework are desired. Initial setup challenges exist, and enhanced security features and GUI updates would benefit less experienced users. Apache needs optimization for resource efficiency and compatibility with modern application architectures.

What are the most important features of Apache Web Server?

Open-Source: Apache is free and community-driven.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Works on multiple operating systems.
Modular Architecture: Allows scalability and customization.
Secure: Supports HTTPS services and has WAF capabilities.
Performance: Efficiently handles client requests.

What benefits can users expect from using Apache Web Server?

Cost-Effective: No licensing fees associated.
High Reliability: Community support ensures stability.
Flexibility: Easily integrates with numerous frameworks.
Scalability: Modular design aids in scaling operations.
Community Support: Continuous updates and enhancements.

Apache Web Server is widely used across different industries such as financial sectors for hosting applications and core banking systems. Integrated with tools like JMeter and Tomcat, it is pivotal in deploying web servers and acting as a proxy for application servers. In cloud migrations, its open-source WAF features using ModSecurity are invaluable, and companies rely on its capabilities for managing threats and attacks through HTTP/HTTPS connections.

Apache

IBM WebSphere Application Server guarantees robustness and scalability, offering excellent integration with systems like CICS and supporting high-performance Java-based applications across diverse industries.

IBM WebSphere Application Server is designed for robustness and scalability, providing seamless integration with enterprise systems such as CICS. Known for its stability and security features, including SSL certificates, it ensures reliable application performance. With an intuitive GUI and Admin Console, it facilitates integration and operation even in complex deployments. However, there are user demands for improvements in areas like cost, complexity, and compatibility with non-Java technologies. Enhanced support for modern web servers and cloud services is also sought.

What are the most important features of IBM WebSphere Application Server?

Scalability: Efficiently handles large application loads and complex deployments.
Security: Offers reliable SSL certificates and robust security protocols.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with systems like CICS and supports Java-based applications.
Usability: Features an intuitive GUI and comprehensive Admin Console.
Performance: High stability and strong performance even under heavy loads.

What benefits should users look for in IBM WebSphere Application Server reviews?

Enterprise Capabilities: Known for comprehensive enterprise capabilities.
Support: Offers excellent support across diverse technology platforms.
Flexibility: Adaptability in managing applications in diverse environments.
Ease of Deployment: Facilitates deployment through command-line tools and console interfaces.

IBM WebSphere Application Server plays a significant role in industries such as banking and retail, where it supports enterprise application deployment, e-commerce sites, and financial transactions. It is used in both on-premise and cloud environments, catering to sectors like insurance and public administration.

IBM

Sample Customers

Cisco, Intuit, General Electric, Adobe, VMware, PayPal, HP, EMC, eBay, Apple, SAP, Qualcomm, SanDisk, Allstate, FedEx

TalkTalk, Property management group, E.SUN Bank, Ohio National Financial Services, Aviarc, Cincom Systems, FJA-US, D+H, Staples, Michigan Municipal League

Apache Web Server vs. IBM WebSphere Application Server