Apache Web Server vs IBM WebSphere Application Server comparison

Apache Web Server vs. IBM WebSphere Application Server

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache Web Server

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM WebSphere Application S...

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

4th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Server (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of Apache Web Server is 8.0%, down from 11.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM WebSphere Application Server is 5.0%, down from 11.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Infrastructure Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
IBM WebSphere Application Server	5.0%
Apache Web Server	8.0%
Other	87.0%

Application Infrastructure

Featured Reviews

Dimitrios Zigkos

Enterprise Architect at Smals vzw

Faced limitations with integration and long-term adaptability but benefited from a lightweight architecture for standalone applications

I find valuable and beneficial the independence that comes with Apache Web Server. You can build a small project using a simple application server without bothering too much about how to manage it. The compatibility with multiple operating systems has helped my operations since most of the time we use Linux. Some systems rely on Windows, but they are few; in the past, Windows was the dominant operating system for mainstream PCs and infrastructure, but not for business. All the companies I worked for had 90% Linux and maybe up to 10% Windows. The initial setup of Apache Web Server was straightforward and okay.

Read full review

Costica Florea

Senior Manager, MW & DB Automation at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Has worked seamlessly in complex clustered environments and supports long-term development efforts

IBM WebSphere Application Server is currently at version 9.0.5.23. In recent months, they released fix 23, as they periodically release fixes. Previously, they frequently increased versions, but now they maintain 9.0.5 with different releases. It's based on Java J2EE 7 and Java SDK 1.8. Oracle announced that 2030 will be the last year when Java SDK 1.8 will be supported. Oracle currently deploys Java 2.x in parallel, with the latest being version 25. The future of IBM WebSphere Application Server remains uncertain since it's based on Java 1.8 and Java 7. I haven't found any white papers or official documentation from IBM outlining their trajectory post-2030.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The control panel is very easy to navigate. It's similar to most hosting platforms, so it's user-friendly. Once you get used to it, managing your hosting becomes easy, too."

"It's reliable, configurable and generally secure."

"The solution's most valuable feature is reporting."

"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward."

"In my experience, Apache Web Server has been a good and stable solution."

"The most significant advantage is the ability to swiftly enable HTTPS services when my DNS is configured correctly."

"The open-source nature is one of its most significant advantages."

"The best thing about Apache is that it is open-source, so implementing my platform on-premises is less expansive than other solutions."

More Apache Web Server pros

"IBM WebSphere Application Server is easy to use."

"Security: It is compatible with the latest Java 8 security features, supports FIPS 140-2 and NIST SP 800-53 with strong ciphers and cryptography keys, and supports TLS 1.2 completely. Also, configuring client and server certificates is relatively easy."

"What's most valuable in IBM WebSphere Application Server is its resilience. When you use the solution, you know that after the communication has been done, there will be no doubt that the data has reached its destination."

"The integration between IBM tools and applications is very well executed, and the support from IBM is quite good, providing a solid support structure."

"Network Deployment is the most useful feature for scalability. It has many features within the standard WebSphere Application Server edition."

"As compared to other applications, it has tremendous support. We have built internal capability so that we use it extensively internally. It is also easier to use with the outside data. You can write in ESQL, Java, or any other technology that you want to use for development. So, it is a lot more flexible in the language that it supports."

"One of the most valuable features might be the stability of the IBM WebSphere Application Server."

"The performance is good."

More IBM WebSphere Application Server pros

Cons

"Apache Server and the Nginx also do not require any licenses, and I think because of this that the support is not so good for us."

"The GUI for the less experienced users needs some improvement. For some companies, it is hard to configure it if they have not had any experience."

"With Apache, you can't update the system. There is a big gap between models. I don't like this."

"Regarding advice, there is a security-related problem that depends on the web server's configuration."

"The product's initial setup process could be easier for users."

"By optimizing the infrastructure to allow the webserver to directly handle queries from memory—particularly by prioritizing the storage of queries in memory and processing them through the web server interface—I could potentially cut down the required instances from five hundred to two hundred."

"No support is available from Apache software foundation."

"The major issue occurs with ports. So, I would like to see easier port management."

More Apache Web Server cons

"The installation is not straightforward and it can take three days."

"Sometimes, I feel WebSphere runs a bit slow. It might be loading unnecessary libraries, impacting its performance compared to other application servers."

"I'd like to see the ability to build clusters made a little bit easier. It is kind of a manual process right now and this would just help save time and reduce resources."

"Room for improvement would only be in the licensing. As with all IBM products the licensing can be complex and expensive."

"I think in some moments, the security was a little bit more complex to configure when it was delegated to other systems, making it an area where improvements are required."

"Since we've been monitoring it directly ourselves, we've found that there has been an increase in the number of failures. The failures result in deadlock processes that generate very little to no troubleshooting logs."

"WebSphere Application Server doesn't have an automated deployment option, forcing us to use third-party tools like Jenkins UCD and Palo Automated Deployment."

"When compared with WebLogic, Weblogic is lighter and consumes less memory."

More IBM WebSphere Application Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an open-source solution."

"It is a free-of-cost solution."

"The apache software is free, open-source."

"There is no licensing cost for the product."

"It's expensive."

"I don't remember the price, but there are no additional costs."

"It is very expensive."

"We pay around $200,000 annually."

"We used to pay about $100,000-$120,000 US or somewhere around there. That was a bit cost-prohibitive for us to continue."

"The pricing is a little expensive."

"The licensing policy is based on the PVU base."

"The licensing cost is 1,000 of euros for a 30-year table."

More IBM WebSphere Application Server pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

30%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Web Server?

There are no fees associated with the usage of Apache Web Server in my projects. If you want to have support, then there is some cost, but today I do not know how many companies pay for that servic...

What needs improvement with Apache Web Server?

I would like to see improvements in the functionality and core of Apache Web Server, focusing on building an infrastructure that can be resilient and robust enough to handle resource shortages, and...

What is your primary use case for Apache Web Server?

I am currently working with Apache Web Server in my projects because I'm an architect. Some years ago, it was the application server and the web server; it was Apache Daemon and Apache, the web ser...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM WebSphere Application Server?

At Royal Bank, which is a major IBM customer with mainframes and numerous IBM products, they have a specific agreement regarding pricing. The pricing structure for large enterprise customers differ...

What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere Application Server?

What is your primary use case for IBM WebSphere Application Server?

I was part of an application where I integrated IBM WebSphere Application Server with Node.js and Blue Prism. I did a lot of REST applications because at my core, I'm a developer. Currently, I'm an...

NGINX Plus vs Apache Web Server

Comparisons

IIS vs Apache Web Server

Compared 17% of the time

Compared 16% of the time

Magic xpa Application Platform vs Apache Web Server

Compared 7% of the time

Windows Server AppFabric vs Apache Web Server

Compared 6% of the time

More Apache Web Server Competitors

NGINX Plus vs IBM WebSphere Application Server

Compared 13% of the time

Tomcat vs IBM WebSphere Application Server

Compared 10% of the time

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs IBM WebSphere Application Server

Compared 9% of the time

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) vs IBM WebSphere Application Server

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft .NET Framework vs IBM WebSphere Application Server

Compared 3% of the time

More IBM WebSphere Application Server Competitors

Product Reports

Apache Web Server

Download Apache Web Server product report

IBM WebSphere Application Server

Download IBM WebSphere Application Server product report

Also Known As

Apache HTTP Server

WebSphere Application Server

Overview

Apache Web Server is a stable, open-source platform known for its cost-effectiveness, multi-platform compatibility, ease of setup, and high security. It supports various web scripting languages and enables HTTPS services, making it a popular choice for many organizations.

Apache Web Server offers extensive features including HTTP server capabilities and modularity. It efficiently handles client requests and is highly flexible, which is why many companies utilize it for hosting applications, developing websites, and more. Community support further enhances its reliability, though improvements like integration with cloud systems such as Kubernetes, a simplified port management, and support for Microsoft's .Net framework are desired. Initial setup challenges exist, and enhanced security features and GUI updates would benefit less experienced users. Apache needs optimization for resource efficiency and compatibility with modern application architectures.

What are the most important features of Apache Web Server?

Open-Source: Apache is free and community-driven.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Works on multiple operating systems.
Modular Architecture: Allows scalability and customization.
Secure: Supports HTTPS services and has WAF capabilities.
Performance: Efficiently handles client requests.

What benefits can users expect from using Apache Web Server?

Cost-Effective: No licensing fees associated.
High Reliability: Community support ensures stability.
Flexibility: Easily integrates with numerous frameworks.
Scalability: Modular design aids in scaling operations.
Community Support: Continuous updates and enhancements.

Apache Web Server is widely used across different industries such as financial sectors for hosting applications and core banking systems. Integrated with tools like JMeter and Tomcat, it is pivotal in deploying web servers and acting as a proxy for application servers. In cloud migrations, its open-source WAF features using ModSecurity are invaluable, and companies rely on its capabilities for managing threats and attacks through HTTP/HTTPS connections.

Apache

IBM WebSphere Application Server guarantees robustness and scalability, offering excellent integration with systems like CICS and supporting high-performance Java-based applications across diverse industries.

IBM WebSphere Application Server is designed for robustness and scalability, providing seamless integration with enterprise systems such as CICS. Known for its stability and security features, including SSL certificates, it ensures reliable application performance. With an intuitive GUI and Admin Console, it facilitates integration and operation even in complex deployments. However, there are user demands for improvements in areas like cost, complexity, and compatibility with non-Java technologies. Enhanced support for modern web servers and cloud services is also sought.

What are the most important features of IBM WebSphere Application Server?

Scalability: Efficiently handles large application loads and complex deployments.
Security: Offers reliable SSL certificates and robust security protocols.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with systems like CICS and supports Java-based applications.
Usability: Features an intuitive GUI and comprehensive Admin Console.
Performance: High stability and strong performance even under heavy loads.

What benefits should users look for in IBM WebSphere Application Server reviews?

Enterprise Capabilities: Known for comprehensive enterprise capabilities.
Support: Offers excellent support across diverse technology platforms.
Flexibility: Adaptability in managing applications in diverse environments.
Ease of Deployment: Facilitates deployment through command-line tools and console interfaces.

IBM WebSphere Application Server plays a significant role in industries such as banking and retail, where it supports enterprise application deployment, e-commerce sites, and financial transactions. It is used in both on-premise and cloud environments, catering to sectors like insurance and public administration.

IBM

Sample Customers

Cisco, Intuit, General Electric, Adobe, VMware, PayPal, HP, EMC, eBay, Apple, SAP, Qualcomm, SanDisk, Allstate, FedEx

TalkTalk, Property management group, E.SUN Bank, Ohio National Financial Services, Aviarc, Cincom Systems, FJA-US, D+H, Staples, Michigan Municipal League

Apache Web Server vs. IBM WebSphere Application Server