IBM WebSphere Application Server and Apache Web Server compete in the web application serving category. Apache Web Server holds the upper hand in cost-effectiveness and adaptation, whereas WebSphere is preferred for enterprise-level features.
Features: IBM WebSphere Application Server includes integrated security, scalability, and transaction management. Apache Web Server offers open-source flexibility, lightweight design, and easy integration with various platforms. Apache's modular architecture allows for tailored setups, whereas WebSphere's extensive feature set suits comprehensive enterprise environments.
Room for Improvement: IBM WebSphere Application Server could improve on simplifying its deployment process, reducing complexity, and offering more affordable options for smaller enterprises. Apache Web Server can enhance enterprise-level features, offer robust transaction management, and integrate comprehensive customer service options.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apache Web Server is easier to deploy with straightforward installation and widespread platform compatibility, offering community-based support. IBM WebSphere requires a structured deployment process with professional service options, offering robust enterprise-level support and resources.
Pricing and ROI: IBM WebSphere Application Server incurs higher initial costs with a significant ROI tied to enterprise capabilities and complex functionality. Apache Web Server is cost-effective, being open-source with low setup costs. Apache delivers a quicker ROI due to minimal initial expenses, whereas WebSphere promises a longer-term ROI through enhanced functionality and support for large-scale applications.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| IBM WebSphere Application Server | 10.0% |
| Apache Web Server | 11.4% |
| Other | 78.6% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
The Apache HTTP Server Project was founded in 1995 by a group of webmasters, known as The Apache Group, with the aim of developing robust, richly-featured, freely-available and commercial-standard Web (HTTP) server source code. The result was Apache Web Server or Apache HTTP Server, which is an open-source public-domain web server.
This collaborative project has been enhanced ever since with contributions from the core development team and other volunteers situated all over the globe. Also, hundreds of users of this open-source web server have contributed code, ideas, and documentation. The project falls under The Apache Software Foundation, which manages many open-source projects.
IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) is a middleware platform developed by IBM. It provides a range of services and tools to help organizations develop, deploy, and manage Java-based applications. WAS is part of IBM's WebSphere product family and provides a secure, scalable, and highly available platform for developing and running web-based applications. WAS provides a secure, scalable, and highly available platform, making it an attractive solution for organizations looking to develop and deploy enterprise-grade applications.
IBM WebSphere Application Server Features
IBM WebSphere Application Server has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:
IBM WebSphere Application Server Benefits
There are many benefits to implementing IBM WebSphere Application Server. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:
Reviews from Real Users
IBM WebSphere Application Server is a solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Some of its major advantages are that it is stable, supports many languages, and is resilient.
Princewill O., Head Banking Application Customization and Reporting at a financial services firm, states, “[The solution is] very stable, supports many languages, and helpful for faster time to market.”
"What's most valuable in IBM WebSphere Application Server is its resilience. When you use the solution, you know that after the communication has been done, there will be no doubt that the data has reached its destination,” says Nicolae C., System and Solutions Architect at Seidor.
Another PeerSpot reviewer, an Enterprise Technical Leader at a tech services company mentions, “[It is an] enterprise-level product with extensive console capabilities, including the ability to control multiple JVM containers.”
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
