

Find out in this report how the two Streaming Analytics solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
Returns depend on the application you deploy and the amount of benefits you are getting, which depends on how many applications you are deploying, what are the sorts of applications, and what are the requirements.
Since there are no upfront licensing fees, the ROI is increased with a scalable system without exponential cost growth.
Think about if you are in a different geographic location and your cluster is hosted in two different geographic locations, maybe one in South Pacific and one in Western Europe. In both cases, if write transactions are happening, this is a good way to basically order the transactions so that the eventual data consistency is there.
If I look into the market, I have very heavy products, and even MySQL is also open source, but PostgreSQL on Ubuntu gives me a lot of savings in terms if I were to go to any other vendor which has a license.
I was getting prompt responses, and it was nicely handled regarding the support.
I would rate them eight if 10 was the best and one was the worst.
Community support is usually helpful in addressing queries and finding solutions to various scenarios.
Customer support for PostgreSQL on Ubuntu is good.
According to me, it is quite scalable in terms of all the data it can handle and stream.
The scalability of PostgreSQL on Ubuntu is very good because complex joins are performed smoothly and efficiently.
I do not see any limits in scalability for PostgreSQL on Ubuntu; it scales well without constraints.
I cannot reduce them back because I do not know what sort of data I need and which sort of data I need to discard. That is a very difficult decision to make.
PostgreSQL on Ubuntu is quite stable.
PostgreSQL on Ubuntu is handling my production infrastructures very well and it is going very good.
PostgreSQL on Ubuntu is stable in my experience because at one time there are more than one user using PostgreSQL on Ubuntu, and it properly provides answers to every user.
If it were easier to configure clusters and had more straightforward configuration, high-level API abstraction in the APIs could improve it.
Regarding additional improvements, I would say probably around error handling, where when we encounter errors specific to our response structures and everything, or the tables or anything of that nature, it would be better if we were prompted with better error handling mechanisms.
Observability and monitoring are areas that could be enhanced.
Maybe it makes more sense to use AI for configuration in future updates of PostgreSQL on Ubuntu so that the database is automatically optimized for the best performance for a given hardware.
I would also appreciate the ability to use the EXPLAIN ANALYZE tool.
Optimizing index management such as adding proper indexes and removing unused ones.
I thought Confluent would stop me when I crossed the credits, but it did not, and then I got charged.
We were on the lowest tier, so it was around $5 or something.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for PostgreSQL on Ubuntu is based on the fact that I am using it as a free source, free open source.
The price model for PostgreSQL on Ubuntu is not expensive; it is affordable since most solutions we use are completely open source, leading to lower costs.
These features are important due to scalability and resiliency.
The Kafka Streams API helps with real-time data transformations and aggregations.
The best features Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud offers would be the connection with various external systems through various languages such as Python and C#.
One of the most important points about PostgreSQL on Ubuntu is that it is free.
Overall, PostgreSQL on Ubuntu is a powerful and reliable database management system; it is easy to use and good for students who want to move beyond basic and industry-level skills.
Any open-source software allows me to look into the code, understand the logic, and mold my code according to it, and it will work perfectly rather than proprietary solutions where I am very much dependent on the vendor and have to wait for their next release to fix things.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud | 0.5% |
| Apache Flink | 10.9% |
| Databricks | 9.0% |
| Other | 79.6% |
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| PostgreSQL on Ubuntu | 0.4% |
| Rocky Linux | 10.2% |
| Ubuntu Linux | 8.8% |
| Other | 80.6% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud provides real-time data streaming with seamless integration, enhanced scalability, and efficient data processing, recognized for its real-time architecture, ease of use, and reliable multi-cloud operations while effectively managing large data volumes.
Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud is designed to handle large-scale data operations across different cloud environments. It supports real-time data streaming, crucial for applications in transaction processing, change data capture, microservices, and enterprise data movement. Users benefit from features like schema registry and error handling, which ensure efficient and reliable operations. While the platform offers extensive connector support and reduced maintenance, there are areas requiring improvement, including better data analysis features, PyTRAN CDC integration, and cost-effective access to premium connectors. Migrating with Kubernetes and managing message states are areas for development as well. Despite these challenges, it remains a robust option for organizations seeking to distribute data effectively for analytics and real-time systems across industries like retail and finance.
What are the key features of Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud?In industries like retail and finance, Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud is implemented to manage real-time location tracking, event-driven systems, and enterprise-level data distribution. It aids in operations that require robust data streaming, such as CDC, log processing, and analytics data distribution, providing a significant edge in data management and operational efficiency.
We monitor all Streaming Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.