Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud vs n8n comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Apache Kafka on Confluent C...
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
Streaming Analytics (10th)
n8n
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
AWS Marketplace (1st)
 

Featured Reviews

Ritik Varshney - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhanced data streaming with reliable features and good analytics
Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud provides an enhanced level of reliability and resources compared to Apache Kafka alone. It offers more features which are beneficial for our clients, including cluster linking, schema registry, error handling, and dead-letter queues. It significantly improves customer and publisher satisfaction, especially with topic integration and data streaming.
FA
Enables user-friendly workflow automation and provides efficient real-time execution logging
The low-code interface and the quick code writing within n8n that we can do and utilize is very helpful. It is very evolving at this point in time and very user-friendly. It brings in efficiency, better time to market, and actually helps us. Since we have hardcore developers in our team who use n8n, it becomes straightforward for them to quickly wrap up some modules from the front end and then connect them and use it quickly for different sorts of integrations. In terms of real-time execution logs, when we are running and debugging any process within n8n, this really helps us in figuring out if there is a problem within different modules. It provides the flexibility of pinning down the problem to the micro level, which is a really good benefit.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Streaming Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
6%
Government
6%
Comms Service Provider
14%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud?
Kafka and Confluent Cloud have proven to be cost-effective, especially when compared to other tools. In a recent BI integration program over the past year, we assessed multiple use cases spanning s...
What needs improvement with Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud?
I think what I would improve about the solution is the cost, mostly. From my standpoint, it's the cost. From an engineering perspective, it works really well. There's always room for improvement. O...
What is your primary use case for Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud?
We find that the best features include using the CDC functionality with the connector to take the data from our SQL database and publish it to many consumers. Any changes enable us to easily publis...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for n8n?
In terms of infrastructure costs, an organization will have to pay for the monthly infrastructure needed for installation. However, when the volume of transactions or operations they need daily or ...
What needs improvement with n8n?
n8n is good in terms of usability, functionality, and many different aspects. I am not too sure what needs to be improved in n8n, but regarding the interface, it has a black background, and they co...
What is your primary use case for n8n?
We have utilized n8n for social media marketing for one of the clients, and for other clients, we have implemented this local implementation for one of their internal businesses. Apart from that, w...
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Databricks, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Confluent and others in Streaming Analytics. Updated: August 2025.
865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.