We performed a comparison between Apache Airflow and Bizagi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Apache Airflow is creating and scheduling jobs. Additionally, the reattempt at failed jobs is useful."
"Since it's widely adopted by the community, Apache Airflow is a user-friendly solution."
"This is a simple tool to automate using Python."
"The user interface for monitoring and managing workflows has been excellent, particularly in the latest version. c"
"I found the following features very useful: DAG - Workload management and orchestration of tasks using."
"Every feature in Apache Airflow is valuable. The number of operators and features I've used are mainly related to connectivity services and integrated services because I primarily work with GCP."
"Since Apache works very well on Python, we can manage everything and create pipelines there."
"Apache Airflow is useful for workflow automation, making it capable of automating pipelines, data pipelines, and data warehouse processes."
"It can be useful as a tool to improve your communications and the control of your processes. For example, when you have to explain a process to seven or eight stakeholders who think differently as well as have different experiences in different functional departments, it is not easy. Sometimes you are using a lot of technical terms, and other times, you are dealing with management terminology. The visual representation helps you create a better alignment and understanding for different roles and stakeholders of your workforce."
"The tool helps to improve business processes and have better KPIs. Also, it is easy to use. Our developers find it easy to learn."
"The API is pretty straightforward."
"The most valuable feature is the organizational modeling capability."
"The initial setup is super simple."
"Agility, reverse engineering, customized portal web, help desk and user guides, easy deployment, simple to modify."
"The visualizations and attachments provided by the product are valuable."
"The interface, design, and accessible user manuals to help get started using the solution are valuable features in Bizagi."
"I want to see Apache Airflow have more integrations with more production-based databases since it is an area where the product lacks currently."
"Enhancements become necessary when scaling it up from a few thousand workflows to a more extensive scale of five thousand or ten thousand workflows."
"Technical support is an area that needs improvement."
"The problem with Apache Airflow is that it is an open-source tool. You have to build it into a Kubernetes container, which is not easy to maintain, and I find it to be very clunky."
"The solution could be improved by simplifying the integration process."
"I would like to see it more friendly for other use cases."
"We're currently using version 1.10, but I understand that there's a lot of improvements in version 2. In the earlier version that we're using, we sometimes have problems with maintenance complexity. Actually using Airflow is okay, but maintaining it has been difficult."
"I would like to see some no-code capabilities and drag and drop abilities in Airflow."
"The free version could be better. Some of the templates and all the functionalities aren't available in the free version. I've been trying to check some maps, for example, organizational maps or a model on organization hierarchy. Apparently, there seems to be no template. You have to create your own. I am not sure if there are templates, but I've not really seen any. I think that there's room for improvement."
"One of the features which could be improved is machine learning. Even though this product has been working on this topic, we can see that it still requires improvement."
"The open source version lacks the option to publish."
"Framework approach, which extends to reusability in tools, like Pega, for deployment management could be improved."
"It needs an easier setup for the Bizagi Engine."
"I would like to see simulation as a free feature again. In version 3.3 it was free, but in 4.0 it isn't."
"In terms of what needs improvement, the costs can be lowered."
"The technical support is not fast enough and should be improved."
Apache Airflow is ranked 2nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 31 reviews while Bizagi is ranked 7th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 78 reviews. Apache Airflow is rated 8.0, while Bizagi is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Apache Airflow writes "Enable seamless integration with various connectivity and integrated services, including BigQuery and Python operators ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bizagi writes "A flexible, customizable solution that reduced time to market, but the UI and customer support could be better". Apache Airflow is most compared with Camunda, Informatica Cloud API and App Integration, IBM BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and OpenText 360 for SharePoint, whereas Bizagi is most compared with Camunda, Visio, Bonita, Microsoft Power Apps and IBM BPM. See our Apache Airflow vs. Bizagi report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
