Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Anaconda Business vs Darwin comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.2
Anaconda Business enhances efficiency and decision-making, leading to reduced costs and improved project delivery for significant ROI.
Sentiment score
6.2
Companies find Darwin efficient, preventing revenue loss and enhancing machine learning, with returns two to three times higher.
Everyone being able to work smoothly without unnecessary delays.
tester at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
I have seen a return on investment; specifically, when we talk about efficiency, it's both time-saving and money-saving.
Product managaer at Zidio development
I have seen a return on investment with time saved by 50% and less downtime, allowing the team to deliver projects faster with fewer errors.
Analyst at Tata consultancy services
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.4
Anaconda Business offers prompt, helpful customer support, with users relying more on documentation and community resources like Stack Overflow.
Sentiment score
8.4
Darwin's support is highly responsive and efficient, quickly resolving issues and providing valuable guidance, ensuring customer satisfaction.
Anaconda Business customer support is very active with a quick response time.
System Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Overall, support was reliable when we needed it, just not super-fast every single time.
tester at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
The customer support for Anaconda Business provides a better approach.
Product managaer at Zidio development
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.7
Anaconda Business efficiently supports scalability, seamless expansion, and smooth performance for growing projects and teams in organizations.
Sentiment score
6.7
Darwin scales well with challenges on large datasets; plans for expansion need internal changes for wider departmental adoption.
As more environments or users get added, it still runs smoothly without major slowdowns.
tester at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Anaconda Business scales very well because it is built around centralized environment and package management.
System Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Anaconda does not have scalability restrictions as it depends on the type of machine running it.
VP Product at Medint
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
Anaconda Business is stable and efficient, offering reduced setup time and performance improvements despite minor memory and update issues.
Sentiment score
7.0
Darwin's stability has improved, boasting 99% availability, though some issues persist; support is responsive, yet enhancements continue.
Earlier, setting up or troubleshooting conflicts could take anywhere from thirty minutes to an hour, but now most setups just work.
tester at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Anaconda Business is stable to an extent, but it sometimes crashes on systems with insufficient RAM.
Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
 

Room For Improvement

Anaconda Business needs OS compatibility updates, user interface improvements, better documentation, and enhanced performance, stability, and functionality.
Darwin users seek API integration, improved functionality, educational resources, and better automation for precision and transparency in AI processes.
It would also be nice to have clearer error messages when something fails, so it is easier to understand what went wrong without digging too much.
tester at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
They should enhance the security point of view; it's good, but it needs some more advanced features.
Product managaer at Zidio development
The pricing should be a little lower for a single person to use, as it might be affordable for an organization, but for my single use, it is difficult.
Product Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
 

Setup Cost

Anaconda Business offers reasonable costs and broad compatibility, despite additional hardware expenses, maintaining satisfaction with free tool access.
Darwin's licensing costs are significant yet often seen as valuable, with predictable setup fees and optional costs for integrations.
Anaconda is an open-source tool, so I do not pay anything for it.
VP Product at Medint
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is a little costly, but it is useful.
Automation Test Engineer at Tata Consultancy services Limited
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates that it is a bit costly, but it is useful.
Analyst at Tata consultancy services
 

Valuable Features

Anaconda Business enhances productivity with centralized management, security, multi-language support, and seamless Python and R integration.
Darwin excels in data cleaning, model-building, and integration, enhancing productivity and accessibility for non-experts in machine learning.
Anaconda Business has positively impacted my organization because, when discussing the security point of view, it's exceptional; when comparing it to other solutions, Anaconda Business is superior.
Product managaer at Zidio development
We find the advanced security, governance, and collaborative features for organizations using Python and R particularly useful.
Product Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Anaconda Business positively impacts our organization by protecting us from compliance and security risks while keeping the environment consistent, allowing our team to focus on insight and innovation instead of worrying about setups, security, and software issues.
Analyst at Tata consultancy services
 

Categories and Ranking

Anaconda Business
Ranking in Data Science Platforms
7th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Darwin
Ranking in Data Science Platforms
25th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Science Platforms category, the mindshare of Anaconda Business is 2.6%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Darwin is 1.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Science Platforms Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Anaconda Business2.6%
Darwin1.0%
Other96.4%
Data Science Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2775498 - PeerSpot reviewer
tester at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Isolate environments and switch package versions efficiently for smoother testing workflows
Overall, it works well, but there are a few things that could be better. Sometimes the environment creation or package installation feels a bit slow, especially with bigger libraries. Another thing I would appreciate is a cleaner, more intuitive interface for managing environments. It works, but a smoother UI could make the workflow faster. It would also be nice to have clearer error messages when something fails, so it is easier to understand what went wrong without digging too much. The documentation could be a bit clearer, especially for troubleshooting specific errors or setup issues. Sometimes I need to search extensively to find the exact steps. Also, having quicker or more detailed support responses would help when something unexpected comes up. These are not major problems, but improving them would definitely make the overall experience smoother. One small improvement I would add is smoother integration with IDEs. It works fine right now, but having even tighter or more automated syncing with tools such as VS Code or PyCharm would make the workflow faster. Perhaps also a few more built-in examples or quick-start guides for common setups would be helpful. Nothing major, just things that would make the experience even more user-friendly.
AC
Founder at Helio Summit
Empowers SMEs to build solutions and interface them with the existing business systems, products and workflows.
There's always room for improvement in the UI and continuing to evolve it to do everything that the rest of AI can do. Because it's so much better than traditional methods, we don't get a ton of complaints of, "Oh, we wish we could do that." Most people are happy to see that they can build models that quickly, and that it can be done by the people who actually understand the problem, i.e. SMEs, rather than having to rely on data scientists. There's a small learning curve, but it's shorter for an SME in a given industry to learn Darwin than it takes for data scientists to learn industry-specific problems. The industry I work in deals with tons and tons of data and a lot of it lends itself to Darwin-created solutions. Initially, there were some limitations around the size of the datasets, the number of rows and number of columns. That was probably the biggest challenge. But we've seen the Darwin product, over time, slowly remove those limitations. We're happy with the progress they've made.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Science Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
University
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise19
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Large Enterprise2
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Anaconda?
The tool's most valuable feature is its cloud-based nature, allowing accessibility from anywhere. Additionally, using Jupyter Notebook makes it easy to handle bugs and errors.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Anaconda?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is a little costly, but it is useful.
What needs improvement with Anaconda?
I am still becoming familiar with Anaconda Business tools after using them for only two years, so I am not utilizing Anaconda Business extensively in data analysis and data science projects yet. I ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

LinkedIn, NASA, Boeing, JP Morgan, Recursion Pharmaceuticals, DARPA, Microsoft, Amazon, HP, Cisco, Thomson Reuters, IBM, Bridgestone
Hunt Oil, Hitachi High-Tech Solutions
Find out what your peers are saying about Anaconda Business vs. Darwin and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.