Amazon AWS vs Rackspace Cloud [EOL] comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Rackspace Technology are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Additionally, 93% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Rackspace Technology users who would recommend it.

Amazon AWS

Read 261 Amazon AWS reviews

35,082 Views
13,682 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Rackspace Cloud [EOL]

Read 11 Rackspace Cloud [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Amazon AWS

Rackspace Cloud [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon AWS and Rackspace Cloud [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Red Hat and others in PaaS Clouds.

To learn more, read our detailed PaaS Clouds Report (Updated: July 2026).

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

July 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 904,680 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon AWS

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

261

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (2nd), PaaS Clouds (2nd)

Rackspace Cloud [EOL]

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Q&A Highlights

Avigail Sugarman

Community Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)

Aug 21, 2014

Rackspace, Dimension Data, and others that were in last year's Challenger quadrant became Niche Players: Agree/ Disagree

Agree. All those are not true cloud player but somewhere in between hosted cloud and true cloud computing.

See all answers

Featured Reviews

Asif Meem

Senior Machine Learning Engineer at sportsbet

Managed cloud services have helped accelerate experiments with flexible configuration options

Sometimes the costs associated with spinning up a service, especially managed services, have implications. For example, if I create a Glue job, that will create S3 buckets and other resources that have cost implications, but once I clean up a Glue job, it does not delete the other accessory resources. Sometimes, I have to go hunting for what resources Amazon AWS might have provisioned and how it is costing behind the scenes. It can be complex depending on your level of expertise. It is not as easy to get started, especially when it comes to secure practices. Amazon AWS is more hands-on than other platforms.

Read full review

Rajbir Singh

Director - DevOps and Infrastructure at INTIGRAL

There is easy integration with multiple providers and third-party services

It is very stable. It works 99.9 percent of the time. We are quite happy with it. This product is used to help broadcast football games' live streams, video matches and fantasy games, and it is used extensively. We have almost two million plus downloads, and during peak seasons, we could have 100,000 concurrent users watching 11 different matches.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the S3."

"The ecosystem offered by the product has almost everything."

"AWS is quite good for cloud services such as IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS, providing a rich set of services and integrated monitoring tools alongside a competitive pricing model."

"The features with Amazon AWS that I have found most valuable are its flexibility and high availability. These are the most important and attractive points for me."

"This solution is very easy to use and it has a professional interface."

"The features that I have found most valuable are their compute and their Relational Database Service."

"We switched to it because of its ease of use, ease of deployment, and cost."

"Provisioning and resource administration include billing dashboards, which are very extensive."

More Amazon AWS pros

"There is easy integration with multiple providers and third-party services."

"Ability to quickly create reliable virtual servers."

"It is very stable; it works 99.9 percent of the time, and we are quite happy with it."

"The tourism business is seasonally based, therefore our infrastructure needs are variable, and this service works perfectly for us."

"The most valuable feature for us is the support, which is really efficient."

"The new generation of Rackspace Cloud servers are a strong improvement over the first generation."

"Image backup is a valuable feature, and even though this is a common feature, it is very helpful for us."

Cons

"It would be better if there was a way to see which components were still on. We have some situations where I forget that some components are turned on. We forget some components are on, and we only see that these components are on when we see the bill at the end of the month. It would also be better if AWS had specialized firewalls or integrations with leading products. For example, a specialized firewall with content filtering. We were looking for some firewall tools, and we saw that AWS doesn't have any specialized firewall tools in its services portfolio. So, we are looking for other tools like FortKnox, Forcepoint, and Check Point because we didn't find the solutions in AWS services."

"There are some limitations for certain applications that happen regionally and it is an issue for us."

"There is no control of downtime."

"Deploying AWS is complex in the beginning."

"One area that could be improved is in data management. They could improve on the data side. For example, I see others with better cloud services and larger data computing capabilities."

"One problem is that the AWS public cloud doesn't have shared storage capabilities. The second thing is the cloud performance versus on-prem."

"Amazon AWS could improve on security."

"I would appreciate it if Amazon AWS made a category for the cheapest server option so anyone can run a small website or similar projects."

More Amazon AWS cons

"It would be nice to have more built-in suites compared to others. It would enable easier integration."

"I had a few instances where techs on off hours made extremely bad decisions, resulting in extended site outages lasting hours."

"Comparatively, this solution is a bit expensive."

"Vertical scalability is very limited compared with Amazon EC2, which offers many sorts of instances."

"It doesn't offer Elastic IP like AWS. And also we can't configure our server based on region."

"It's often difficult to get timely support with a ticket, they seem to live by phone calls there."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price, in general, could be better."

"You are not paying a licensing fee, you pay for consumption."

"When we shifted the load to AWS we paid a high cost as the mail stores were hosted on EBS. The storage cost drastically reduced after moving to S3."

"They have a pay-as-you-go subscription."

"The solution's pricing depends on your traffic since they charge you based on the traffic, not the servers. The price can go into many, many thousands depending on the traffic."

"We pay a monthly licensing fee. It's below $100 a month."

"The price tends to be higher, but that is a usual case when prioritizing reliable backup solutions for servers and other infrastructure."

"The price can be better."

More Amazon AWS pricing and cost advice

"The service includes licenses (for operating systems, databases, etc.). Asset management is easier with services like that."

"Comparatively, this solution is a bit expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

904,680 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8586

Engineer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Aug 14, 2013

Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison

Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…

Read full review

Answers from the Community

Avigail Sugarman

Community Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)

Aug 21, 2014

Rackspace, Dimension Data, and others that were in last year's Challenger quadrant became Niche Players: Agree/ Disagree

Agree. All those are not true cloud player but somewhere in between hosted cloud and true cloud computing.

2 out of 4 answers

it_user105252

CTO at a healthcare company with 51-200 employees

Aug 20, 2014

I completely agree. Cloud Computing vending is a scale business. And unless you have the $$ Billions to invest in DCs, interconnects, CDN capacity, as well as in continually investing in the OS and Management software infrastructure, you cannot be anything but a vendor that caters to a particular narrow segment. Its a bit like telephony. You aren't going to do very well going up against GE/Sprint, ATT or Southwest Telecom. BUT if you are an EarthLink, you can play in then niche space of those who want a "socially responsible" Telco. About a year ago, both Rackspace and Centurylink were looking for "capital partners" for future growth investment precisely because of these issues. I don't think they ever raised enough $$. I have been saying for about 5 years now that there is room for 4-5 major cloud vendors and they were going to be: Amazon, Google, Microsoft. and then fighting for the last 1-2 slots were IBM, salesFORCE.com, EMC and perhaps Oracle. Oracle seems to have opted not to keep fighting, and EMC is now more focused on delivering services. So you basically have IBM leveraging its corporate DC and mainframe hardware consolidation capabilities and Salesforce is leverging its lead in CRM to get apps built on Force.com But pretty much everyone else is a niche player. The Future is Platform As A Service. NOT "vms" and Rackspace and Dimension Data all were hoping to move from VMs to PaaS but that's a hard move to make.

Read full answer

it_user8685

Infrastructure Expert at Cloud Counselage Inc. (www.cloudcounselage.com)

Aug 20, 2014

DISAGREE. VMware is the present and the Future. Be it VMware vCloud and vSphere suites, tough competition for Amazon etc. or be it vCHS. Also, VMware's very own Public IaaS Cloud; vCHS (VMware vCloud Hybrid Service) which will change everything in days to come vis-a-vis Rackspace, IBM's Softlayer etc. Microsoft is not in a competition at all, because it lacks quality compared to the names mentioned above. __Tushar Topale

Read full answer

See all 4 answers

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	131
Midsize Enterprise	48
Large Enterprise	120

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

How does OpenShift compare with Amazon AWS?

Open Shift makes managing infrastructure easy because of self-healing and automatic scaling. There is also a wonderful dashboard mechanism to alert us in case the application is over-committing or ...

See all answers

How is SAP Cloud Platform different than Amazon AWS?

How is SAP Cloud Platform different than Amazon AWS? Amazon AWS offers options both in terms of upgrading and expanding capabilities as well as acquiring greater storage space. These upgrades can ...

See all answers

Looking to compare Google Firebase, Amazon AWS, and Microsoft Azure

We like Google Firebase hosting and authentication and also the excellent cloud functionality. Our team found the flexibility of handling and dealing with the database through EDL to be very useful...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) vs Amazon AWS

Compared 23% of the time

Dell ObjectScale vs Amazon AWS

Compared 6% of the time

SAP Business Technology Platform vs Amazon AWS

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Amazon AWS

Compared 4% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Amazon AWS

Compared 3% of the time

More Amazon AWS Competitors

Microsoft Azure vs Rackspace Cloud [EOL]

Compared 21% of the time

Xigo Dimension Data vs Rackspace Cloud [EOL]

Compared 19% of the time

Google Firebase vs Rackspace Cloud [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service vs Rackspace Cloud [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

Lumen Symphony vs Rackspace Cloud [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

More Rackspace Cloud [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon AWS

July 2026

Download Amazon AWS product report

Buyer's Guide

Rackspace Cloud [EOL]

June 2026

Download Rackspace Cloud [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Amazon Web Services, AWS

No data available

Overview

Amazon AWS offers cloud services known for ease of use, scalability, and diverse services such as EC2, S3, and Lambda. Its pay-as-you-go pricing and robust security features make it a preferred choice for businesses managing growing demands efficiently.

Amazon AWS provides a comprehensive ecosystem with services like EC2 for computing, S3 for storage, and Lambda for serverless computing. It emphasizes scalability and quick resource provisioning, allowing businesses to handle IT workloads, host websites, and manage analytics seamlessly. AWS integrates a wide range of services, enhancing flexibility and reliability while offering robust security and automated management to streamline operations.

What are the most important features of Amazon AWS?

EC2: Offers scalable computing capacity in the cloud to manage business applications efficiently.
S3: Provides highly secure, durable, and scalable cloud storage solutions for data archiving and backup.
Lambda: Enables running code without provisioning or managing servers, improving application deployment.
Pricing: Employs a pay-as-you-go model, allowing cost-effective resource usage.
Security: Implements comprehensive security protocols to ensure data protection across services.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Supports business growth by easily scaling resources according to demand.
Integration: Offers seamless integration capabilities with numerous services, enhancing operational flexibility.
Performance: Provides stable and reliable performance for critical IT workloads and applications.
Management: Features automated management tools that reduce overhead and improve deployment efficiency.

Amazon AWS is widely implemented across industries for cloud computing, infrastructure hosting, and data storage. Businesses in finance, healthcare, and technology sectors leverage AWS for running applications, hosting analytics databases, and deploying scalable solutions. By utilizing tools like EC2, S3, and Lambda, they ensure flexibility and security in infrastructure management and data applications, meeting diverse operational needs effectively.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Rackspace is a listed company that specializes in hybrid cloud environments to support your applications and sites. The environments are based on its open-source operating system OpenStack.Rackspace Cloud caters for the private cloud, public cloud, dedicated servers, or a hybrid of platforms.

Your Rackspace Cloud environment is customizable according to your cloud requirements, and all products work together seamlessly from one portal.

Rackspace Technology

Sample Customers

Pinterest, General Electric, Pfizer, Netflix, and Nasdaq.

3D Capacity, Acquity Group, Axios Systems, Behance, Blastro, Dominos Pizza, and Sage.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Red Hat and others in PaaS Clouds. Updated: July 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

904,680 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.