Amazon API Gateway vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and IBM are both solutions in the API Management category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while IBM is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 12.3% mindshare in APIM, compared to IBM’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Amazon API Gateway

Read 46 Amazon API Gateway reviews

11,283 Views
11,283 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Read 5 IBM Cloud Pak for Integration reviews

1,260 Views
617 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon API Gateway

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Amazon API Gateway and IBM Cloud Pak for Integration compete in cloud-based integration solutions. Amazon API Gateway is favored for its pricing and AWS integrations, while IBM Cloud Pak for Integration's extensive feature set makes it appealing to enterprises.

Features: Amazon API Gateway integrates seamlessly with AWS services, offers rapid setup, and excellent scalability. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration provides a versatile platform with various integration styles, pre-built connectors, and accommodates complex enterprise needs.

Room for Improvement: Amazon API Gateway could enhance its connectivity options outside AWS and offer more flexible deployment choices. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration might improve ease of use, reduce deployment complexity, and streamline its onboarding process for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon API Gateway is easy to deploy within existing AWS environments, benefiting from AWS's strong support network. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration, though complex to deploy, caters to diverse environments and provides premium customer support with personalized assistance for intricate requirements.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon API Gateway's simple pricing model with lower initial costs suits smaller businesses seeking quick value. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration requires higher initial expenses, offering a robust ROI through scalability and customizability, ideal for larger enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon API Gateway vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon API Gateway vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,455 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon API Gateway

Ranking in API Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Ranking in API Management

28th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (16th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Amazon API Gateway is 12.3%, down from 13.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Amazon API Gateway	12.3%
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration	0.8%
Other	86.9%

API Management

Featured Reviews

Pradeep Tamanar

Architect at Birlasoft IndiaLtd.

Strong technical support and effective toolset improve workflow but setup process requires refinement

I have experience with Nintex and K2, but I do not have experience with Unqork. I am specialized in Microsoft products such as Power Automate and Power Apps. I have knowledge of Microsoft Intune and Defender, along with certain Azure components. I work for an organization as a presales architect, proposing solutions to customers. I am familiar with Microsoft Defender for Identity, for Business, and for IoT, though I haven't worked extensively on that. I have a conceptually good understanding of it. I'm mostly working on Microsoft collaboration tools, which include SharePoint and Power Platform tools. I have been dealing mostly with Microsoft, but also with other vendors. Regarding database services, we typically use SQL server services. We have not used Amazon RDS; typically, we use PostgreSQL or MySQL. On the Azure side, I work with Azure Database services including PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQL Cosmos. I was previously working as an architect for U3Soft and am currently working with Birlasoft (B I R L A S O F T). My overall rating for Amazon API Gateway is 8 out of 10.

Read full review

Igor Khalitov

Owner/Full Stack Software Engineer at Maraphonic, Inc.

Manages APIs and integrates microservices with redirection feature

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration includes monitoring capabilities to track the performance and health of your integrations. You can quickly roll back to a previous version if an issue arises. Additionally, it supports incremental deployments, allowing you to shift traffic to a new version of an API gradually. For example, you can start by directing 10% of traffic to the new version while the rest continue using the legacy version. If everything works as expected, you can gradually increase the traffic to the new version over time. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration has a client base that includes numerous organizations using AI and machine learning technologies. We leverage an open-source machine learning framework and integrate it with Kafka to help create and manage various products and data retrieval processes. For companies with private data, the framework first retrieves relevant data from a GitHub database, which is then combined with the final request before being sent to a language model like GPT. This ensures that the language model uses your specific data to generate responses. Kafka plays a key role by streaming real-time data from file systems and databases like Oracle and Microsoft SQL. This data is published to Kafka topics, then vectorized and used with artificial intelligence to enhance the overall process. It's like an old-fashioned approach. The best way is to redesign it with products such as Kafka. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"All information and data needs to be sanitized before it enters a private domain and we use this solution to do this."

"It allows us to expose our APIs and provides tools for managing them."

"It is easy to set up. It is also quick to deploy."

"Amazon API Gateway is a very fast solution."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"What I like best about Amazon API Gateway is that it's simple to use, easy to set up, and you can quickly get it up and running. It's a very user-friendly solution. I also didn't experience any issues in terms of Amazon API Gateway interface, integration, or monitoring. The solution runs smoothly."

"This solution is useful for making new APIs."

"In terms of scalability, I haven't encountered any issues with API Gateway. We've significantly increased our traffic from hitting it once or twice a minute to now hitting it ten to fifteen times within a minute. In an hour, we're receiving hundreds of hits. So, it's performing excellently."

More Amazon API Gateway pros

"Redirection is a key feature. It helps in managing multiple microservices by centralizing control and access."

"Cloud Pak for Integration is definitely scalable. That is the most important criteria."

"The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of our policies and everything is managed through JCP. It's still among the positive aspects, and it's a valuable feature."

"It is a stable solution."

"The most valuable aspect of the Cloud Pak, in general, is the flexibility that you have to use the product."

Cons

"I'd appreciate improvements in the user interface to make it more understandable, especially for new AWS users."

"When working with XML payloads, there can be issues due to the lack of a seamless connection between API Gateway and Lambda functions."

"The price could be lower."

"We would like to see more UI-based monitoring."

"Amazon API Gateway can improve the user interface in some areas it could be more polished."

"Their support services come at a considerable cost, leaving room for improvement."

"Its performance and scalability could be better compared to one of its competitors."

"The pricing could be improved. In cases where customers require real-time sync or real-time calling groups with IoT, the volume of data and time lag become a concern."

More Amazon API Gateway cons

"Setting up Cloud Pak for Integration is relatively complex. It's not as easy because it has not yet been fully integrated. You still have some products that are still not containerized, so you still have to run them on a dedicated VM."

"The initial setup is not easy."

"Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent."

"The pricing can be improved."

"Its queuing and messaging features need improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product can be described as a medium-priced solution, but its cost is higher than Azure."

"The pricing model for API Gateway is advantageous due to its serverless nature, as it depends on traffic volume."

"AWS charges for data ingress and egress, which could be further reduced. This would be helpful for customers dealing with large amounts of data coming in or going out from their systems."

"There are no licensing fees."

"The product is expensive."

"My understanding is that it easily goes to $14,000 or $15,000 USD each month for each account, and we have several such accounts."

"Fees are volume-based."

"This is a pay-per-use service, where you only pay for what you use."

More Amazon API Gateway pricing and cost advice

"The solution's pricing model is very flexible."

"It is an expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,455 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

17%

Government

12%

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	21

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Apigee or Amazon API Gateway?

Amazon API Gateway is a platform that supports the creation and publication of API for web applications. The platform can support thousands of simultaneous API calls, and it provides monitoring, ma...

See all answers

How does Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager compare with Amazon API Gateway?

I have found that Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager is the best integration tool out there for API management. It is easy to implement and learn; it provides several options for deployment, (including ...

See all answers

Which is better - Azure API Management or Amazon API Gateway?

If you use Azure products, API Management is a great solution. It solves many of the problems of externalizing web services. For example, when you need versioning, establish a developer portal and ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

It manages APIs and integrates microservices at the enterprise level. It offers a range of capabilities for handling APIs, microservices, and various integration needs. The platform supports thousa...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Amazon API Gateway

Compared 72% of the time

Apigee vs Amazon API Gateway

Compared 5% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Amazon API Gateway

Compared 3% of the time

WSO2 API Manager vs Amazon API Gateway

Compared 3% of the time

IBM API Connect vs Amazon API Gateway

Compared 2% of the time

More Amazon API Gateway Competitors

IBM App Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 26% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 12% of the time

webMethods.io vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 10% of the time

IBM API Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 9% of the time

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon API Gateway

January 2026

Download Amazon API Gateway product report

Buyer's Guide

API Management

December 2025

Download IBM Cloud Pak for Integration product report

Overview

Amazon API Gateway stands out for its seamless integration with AWS, ease of use, scalability, and support for secure API management, benefiting from a serverless architecture that helps control costs while ensuring efficient backend connectivity.

Amazon API Gateway offers significant capabilities for managing APIs, integrating smoothly with AWS Lambda for serverless operations. It provides robust security with authentication, authorization, and input validation. The gateway supports API traffic management, rate limiting, and enhances accessibility while facing areas for potential improvements in pricing, documentation, interface usability, monitoring, security, latency, analytics, and debugging tools. Expanded integration features and AI-based development aids are desirable.

What features make Amazon API Gateway effective?

Ease of Use: Provides a straightforward way to set up and manage APIs.
Scalability: Handles growing API demands effectively.
Integration: Seamless connection with AWS services.
Security: Implements authentication and authorization measures.
Serverless Architecture: Manages costs efficiently with AWS Lambda.
Traffic Management: Supports rate limiting and traffic controls.

What benefits should users focus on in reviews?

Cost Management: Reduces expenses with serverless options.
Efficient Connectivity: Rapidly links backend services.
Enhanced Security: Safeguards API interactions.
Flexibility: Supports diverse API configurations.
API Accessibility: Facilitates external service exposure.

Amazon API Gateway is frequently employed in industries like mobile development and public services to ensure secure, efficient interactions between front-end and back-end systems. It's instrumental in managing APIs, integrating microservices, and offering controlled API access, notably in environments requiring robust security and service exposure.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration gives you complete, flexible integration using capabilities you need to move at today's speed of business, including the tools to help you achieve your application modernization goals as part of your journey to the cloud.

IBM

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Fox Digital Consumer Group, iFlix, UK Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA), Miovision, Olympusat, PhotoVogue, Royale International Group, Veracode

CVS Health Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Amazon API Gateway vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

December 2025

Free Report: Amazon API Gateway vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon API Gateway vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,455 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon API Gateway vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.