We performed a comparison between Amazon API Gateway and IBM Cloud Pak for Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's flexible. It was valuable."
"It's easy to integrate and provide support for existing AWS services if I use the AWS API gateway."
"The most valuable feature in Amazon API Gateway is the itinerary release."
"It is very helpful, with our API-based applications."
"t is easy for integrations if it is deployed in AWS Services."
"What I like best about Amazon API Gateway is that it's simple to use, easy to set up, and you can quickly get it up and running. It's a very user-friendly solution. I also didn't experience any issues in terms of Amazon API Gateway interface, integration, or monitoring. The solution runs smoothly."
"All information and data needs to be sanitized before it enters a private domain and we use this solution to do this."
"Amazon stack is easy to use in combination with other Amazon services, so it was a logical continuity."
"The most valuable aspect of the Cloud Pak, in general, is the flexibility that you have to use the product."
"Cloud Pak for Integration is definitely scalable. That is the most important criteria."
"Currently, I'm not facing any issues with Amazon API Gateway, which satisfies my requirements. I'm pretty happy with what Amazon API Gateway offers, but as its pricing is on the higher side, that's one area for improvement in the solution. What I'd like to see in the next release of Amazon API Gateway is an improvement in the status checks you get from the monitoring feature of the solution. Currently, you get the number of requests received, the number of reports, etc., but if there are more details than what's given by Amazon API Gateway, that will improve the solution."
"I am not completely satisfied with Technical Support."
"The integration could be improved."
"Amazon API Gateway can improve the user interface in some areas it could be more polished."
"Monitoring could be improved."
"We would like to see more UI-based monitoring."
"The user interface, in general, can be better. The user interface for the entire Amazon cloud can be more friendly. There are some scenarios that are not really easy to manage and configure through the user interface."
"The user interface could be improved, as well as customer support and having a local customer representative in a country."
"The initial setup is not easy."
"Setting up Cloud Pak for Integration is relatively complex. It's not as easy because it has not yet been fully integrated. You still have some products that are still not containerized, so you still have to run them on a dedicated VM."
Amazon API Gateway is ranked 6th in API Management with 9 reviews while IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is ranked 19th in API Management with 2 reviews. Amazon API Gateway is rated 8.2, while IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Amazon API Gateway writes "Secure, easy to use, includes WAF rules, has responsive technical support, and provides excellent documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Cloud Pak for Integration writes "Stable, with good automation capabilities and is quite flexible". Amazon API Gateway is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, Apigee, Kong Enterprise and WSO2 API Manager, whereas IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is most compared with IBM App Connect, IBM DataPower Gateway, Microsoft Azure API Management, AWS Data Pipeline and IBM API Connect. See our Amazon API Gateway vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
