Amazon API Gateway vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration comparison

Amazon API Gateway vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon API Gateway

Ranking in API Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Ranking in API Management

28th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Amazon API Gateway is 9.5%, down from 12.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is 1.0%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Amazon API Gateway	9.5%
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration	1.0%
Other	89.5%

API Management

Featured Reviews

Subrata Maity

Head - Engineering ,Technology and Enterprise Architecture at a tech consulting company with 201-500 employees

Faced challenges with audit trails and seek better user-level monitoring and control

Regarding built-in authorization, monitoring is quite substantial, and versioning systems is also what we are using. With Amazon API Gateway, we utilize a variety of deployment methods and services they provide, so monitoring services are the important parameter in API control from our side, allowing us to see how the APIs behave and how well they pick up the data from their respective sources. Integration with AWS Lambda has been beneficial since we have event controllers that help identify the APIs, which then call the API from the API services. We're managing this with events that are parameterized through API identification, mostly using Python in Lambda, which has inbuilt features to track API lifecycle parameters. The defined parameterized features in Amazon API Gateway help streamline API lifecycle management. Our AWS system admin team sets these configurations for us. The versioning number gets updated as we deploy revised API versions, which gets monitored on the API monitoring services. The cloud engineering team assists us as we are from a solutions development and deployment team. The importance of Amazon API Gateway's global API deployment for our application's performance is significant in terms of scalability and availability. Amazon API Gateway services have been very good, maintaining a 99.99 SLA, providing us confidence in the global deployment level as it is capable of handling various endpoint types, such as database sites and legacy systems.

Read full review

Igor Khalitov

Owner/Full Stack Software Engineer at Maraphonic, Inc.

Manages APIs and integrates microservices with redirection feature

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration includes monitoring capabilities to track the performance and health of your integrations. You can quickly roll back to a previous version if an issue arises. Additionally, it supports incremental deployments, allowing you to shift traffic to a new version of an API gradually. For example, you can start by directing 10% of traffic to the new version while the rest continue using the legacy version. If everything works as expected, you can gradually increase the traffic to the new version over time. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration has a client base that includes numerous organizations using AI and machine learning technologies. We leverage an open-source machine learning framework and integrate it with Kafka to help create and manage various products and data retrieval processes. For companies with private data, the framework first retrieves relevant data from a GitHub database, which is then combined with the final request before being sent to a language model like GPT. This ensures that the language model uses your specific data to generate responses. Kafka plays a key role by streaming real-time data from file systems and databases like Oracle and Microsoft SQL. This data is published to Kafka topics, then vectorized and used with artificial intelligence to enhance the overall process. It's like an old-fashioned approach. The best way is to redesign it with products such as Kafka. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"From my perspective of ease of use, it is very good."

"What I like best about Amazon API Gateway is that it's simple to use, easy to set up, and you can quickly get it up and running. It's a very user-friendly solution. I also didn't experience any issues in terms of Amazon API Gateway interface, integration, or monitoring. The solution runs smoothly."

"It provides the flexibility to configure, switch, and manage configurations through cloud permissions or performance settings."

"Amazon API Gateway services have been very good, maintaining a 99.99 SLA, providing us confidence in the global deployment level as it is capable of handling various endpoint types, such as database sites and legacy systems."

"The Lambda features are very cost-effective since you do not have to run your servers 24/7."

"One of the most valuable aspects of API Gateway is its native integration with AWS services."

"The most valuable feature is the ease of managing the gateway."

"In terms of the most valuable features, I would say that it is really easy to start working with it."

More Amazon API Gateway pros

"In general, the solution works very, very well."

"The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of our policies and everything is managed through JCP. It's still among the positive aspects, and it's a valuable feature."

"It is a stable solution."

"Cloud Pak for Integration is definitely scalable. That is the most important criteria."

"The most valuable aspect of the Cloud Pak, in general, is the flexibility that you have to use the product."

"Redirection is a key feature. It helps in managing multiple microservices by centralizing control and access."

Cons

"The user interface could be improved, as well as customer support and having a local customer representative in a country."

"I'd appreciate improvements in the user interface to make it more understandable, especially for new AWS users."

"I would say Amazon API Gateway is a bit costly, but considering the feature level, it is very good."

"Amazon API Gateway can improve the user interface in some areas it could be more polished."

"If I take into consideration the past three to four years, during which I used the tool, I would say that some missing and external configurations were not possible in the product, and it was a bit difficult to manage."

"Its support for SAM integration could be made more accessible."

"Currently, I'm not facing any issues with Amazon API Gateway, which satisfies my requirements. I'm pretty happy with what Amazon API Gateway offers, but as its pricing is on the higher side, that's one area for improvement in the solution. What I'd like to see in the next release of Amazon API Gateway is an improvement in the status checks you get from the monitoring feature of the solution. Currently, you get the number of requests received, the number of reports, etc., but if there are more details than what's given by Amazon API Gateway, that will improve the solution."

"I believe better governance and monitoring features would be beneficial."

More Amazon API Gateway cons

"The initial setup is not easy."

"Setting up Cloud Pak for Integration is relatively complex. It's not as easy because it has not yet been fully integrated. You still have some products that are still not containerized, so you still have to run them on a dedicated VM."

"Its queuing and messaging features need improvement."

"The pricing can be improved."

"What needs to be improved is the restriction that they have on the product."

"Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My understanding is that it easily goes to $14,000 or $15,000 USD each month for each account, and we have several such accounts."

"There are no licensing fees."

"The solution is expensive. Though the product was previously available at a cheap rate, nowadays it is expensive."

"It is somewhat costly, particularly when it introduces server-related features, which are often scheduled on our end."

"This is a pay-per-use service, where you only pay for what you use."

"The product is expensive."

"The product can be described as a medium-priced solution, but its cost is higher than Azure."

"The solution's price is reasonable."

More Amazon API Gateway pricing and cost advice

"It is an expensive solution."

"The solution's pricing model is very flexible."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	21

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Apigee or Amazon API Gateway?

Amazon API Gateway is a platform that supports the creation and publication of API for web applications. The platform can support thousands of simultaneous API calls, and it provides monitoring, ma...

How does Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager compare with Amazon API Gateway?

I have found that Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager is the best integration tool out there for API management. It is easy to implement and learn; it provides several options for deployment, (including ...

Which is better - Azure API Management or Amazon API Gateway?

If you use Azure products, API Management is a great solution. It solves many of the problems of externalizing web services. For example, when you need versioning, establish a developer portal and ...

What needs improvement with IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent.

What is your primary use case for IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

It manages APIs and integrates microservices at the enterprise level. It offers a range of capabilities for handling APIs, microservices, and various integration needs. The platform supports thousa...

What advice do you have for others considering IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Amazon API Gateway

Comparisons

Compared 69% of the time

Apigee vs Amazon API Gateway

Compared 4% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Amazon API Gateway

Compared 3% of the time

WSO2 API Manager vs Amazon API Gateway

Compared 2% of the time

Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs Amazon API Gateway

Compared 2% of the time

More Amazon API Gateway Competitors

AWS Glue vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 13% of the time

AVAP Sphere vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 11% of the time

IBM API Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 10% of the time

IBM App Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 9% of the time

IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Competitors

Product Reports

Amazon API Gateway

Download Amazon API Gateway product report

API Management

Download IBM Cloud Pak for Integration product report

Overview

Amazon API Gateway stands out for its seamless integration with AWS, ease of use, scalability, and support for secure API management, benefiting from a serverless architecture that helps control costs while ensuring efficient backend connectivity.

Amazon API Gateway offers significant capabilities for managing APIs, integrating smoothly with AWS Lambda for serverless operations. It provides robust security with authentication, authorization, and input validation. The gateway supports API traffic management, rate limiting, and enhances accessibility while facing areas for potential improvements in pricing, documentation, interface usability, monitoring, security, latency, analytics, and debugging tools. Expanded integration features and AI-based development aids are desirable.

What features make Amazon API Gateway effective?

Ease of Use: Provides a straightforward way to set up and manage APIs.
Scalability: Handles growing API demands effectively.
Integration: Seamless connection with AWS services.
Security: Implements authentication and authorization measures.
Serverless Architecture: Manages costs efficiently with AWS Lambda.
Traffic Management: Supports rate limiting and traffic controls.

What benefits should users focus on in reviews?

Cost Management: Reduces expenses with serverless options.
Efficient Connectivity: Rapidly links backend services.
Enhanced Security: Safeguards API interactions.
Flexibility: Supports diverse API configurations.
API Accessibility: Facilitates external service exposure.

Amazon API Gateway is frequently employed in industries like mobile development and public services to ensure secure, efficient interactions between front-end and back-end systems. It's instrumental in managing APIs, integrating microservices, and offering controlled API access, notably in environments requiring robust security and service exposure.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration offers multi-cloud management and automation, focusing on connecting core systems for seamless integration using advanced technologies and efficient API management.

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration provides flexibility, automation, and accounting tools on the OpenShift Container Platform, easing license and management. Among its notable features are effective streaming capabilities, simplified policy implementation via JCP, and enhanced control with redirection, particularly beneficial for microservices management. Its stability and practical container management are major advantages. However, limitations include exclusive IBM product deployment over OpenShift and complex initial setup. Users seek better pricing, enhanced streaming features, improved queuing and messaging, and integration with monitoring tools. Enhanced enterprise bots are needed for balance with Kafka and Confluent.

What are IBM Cloud Pak for Integration's key features?

Flexibility: Supports multi-cloud management and automation for seamless integration.
Streaming: Effective streaming feature for data processing and policy implementation.
Redirection: Enhances control and access for microservices management.
OpenShift Platform: Simplifies licensing and management with container technology.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Simplified policy implementation and automation reduce operational challenges.
Control: Enhanced management of microservices and APIs for streamlined operations.
Stability: Robust container management for consistent performance.
Integration: Supports integration with multiple technologies like Kafka and DataPower.

Implemented across industries like travel and banking, IBM Cloud Pak for Integration aids in connecting core systems and enables effective automation and API management. It supports data conversion, format alterations, and comprehensive management of numerous APIs, providing deployment options based on specific needs.

IBM

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Fox Digital Consumer Group, iFlix, UK Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA), Miovision, Olympusat, PhotoVogue, Royale International Group, Veracode

CVS Health Corporation

Amazon API Gateway vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration