We performed a comparison between Amazon API Gateway and IBM Cloud Pak for Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup is straightforward."
"One of the most valuable aspects of API Gateway is its native integration with AWS services."
"t is easy for integrations if it is deployed in AWS Services."
"In terms of scalability, I haven't encountered any issues with API Gateway. We've significantly increased our traffic from hitting it once or twice a minute to now hitting it ten to fifteen times within a minute. In an hour, we're receiving hundreds of hits. So, it's performing excellently."
"API Gateway offers a multitude of configuration parameters that enable versatile request filtering and protection against potential attacks."
"The most valuable feature in Amazon API Gateway is the itinerary release."
"Amazon stack is easy to use in combination with other Amazon services, so it was a logical continuity."
"It is a stable solution."
"It is a stable solution."
"The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of our policies and everything is managed through JCP. It's still among the positive aspects, and it's a valuable feature."
"The most valuable aspect of the Cloud Pak, in general, is the flexibility that you have to use the product."
"Cloud Pak for Integration is definitely scalable. That is the most important criteria."
"API Gateway lacks some governance features that MuleSoft offers, and there are additional features that could make it even better."
"I am not completely satisfied with Technical Support."
"The course management needs improvement. It's always an issue to set up the course management, especially when you use data form."
"A lower price would definitely be an improvement."
"Their support services come at a considerable cost, leaving room for improvement."
"Its performance and scalability could be better compared to one of its competitors."
"Amazon API Gateway will wait for only 30 seconds to get a response from other services, such as the Lambda function."
"The user interface could be improved, as well as customer support and having a local customer representative in a country."
"The initial setup is not easy."
"Its queuing and messaging features need improvement."
"Setting up Cloud Pak for Integration is relatively complex. It's not as easy because it has not yet been fully integrated. You still have some products that are still not containerized, so you still have to run them on a dedicated VM."
"The pricing can be improved."
More IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →
Amazon API Gateway is ranked 3rd in API Management with 37 reviews while IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is ranked 21st in API Management with 4 reviews. Amazon API Gateway is rated 8.2, while IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Amazon API Gateway writes "Easy initial setup and highly stable solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Cloud Pak for Integration writes "A hybrid integration platform that applies the functionality of closed-loop AI automation". Amazon API Gateway is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, Apigee, WSO2 API Manager and Kong Gateway Enterprise, whereas IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is most compared with IBM App Connect, IBM API Connect, IBM DataPower Gateway, Microsoft Azure API Management and MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager. See our Amazon API Gateway vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
