Amazon API Gateway vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration comparison

Amazon API Gateway vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon API Gateway

Ranking in API Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Ranking in API Management

24th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Amazon API Gateway is 13.0%, down from 14.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is 0.5%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

Rahul Kundu

AWS Engineer at Abbott

Cost-effective serverless routing with room for extended timeout settings

We are using API Gateway to route the traffic to our Lambdas. Every API pass is linked to some of the Lambdas. When traffic hits CloudFront, it redirects it to API Gateway, which then redirects it to the respective Lambda server. We have different kinds of services invoked through these Lambdas…

Read full review

Neelima Golla

Senior Software Engineer at NessPRO Italy

A hybrid integration platform that applies the functionality of closed-loop AI automation

I recommend using it because, in today's context, the cloud plays a significant role. Within the same user interface, you can develop applications and manage multiple applications, making it a more user-friendly option. Moreover, you can explore various other technologies while deploying on the cloud, broadening your knowledge of cloud technologies. In my case, the transition led to my learning of Kubernetes, enabling multi-scaling and expanding my technical skills. It was a valuable experience, and I had the opportunity to learn many new things during the migration process. I can easily rate it an eight or nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a stable solution."

"The solution is stable."

"It allows us to expose our APIs and provides tools for managing them."

"What I like best about Amazon API Gateway is that it's simple to use, easy to set up, and you can quickly get it up and running. It's a very user-friendly solution. I also didn't experience any issues in terms of Amazon API Gateway interface, integration, or monitoring. The solution runs smoothly."

"It's easy to integrate and provide support for existing AWS services if I use the AWS API gateway."

"The Cognito authorization integration is very useful, along with the easy multi-region integration and connectivity with various AWS services like SQS, SNS, and Lambda functions."

"This solution gives you a unified way to have your API accessed."

"The best thing about Amazon API Gateway is that it can authenticate and authorize requests without going to our back end."

More Amazon API Gateway pros

"It is a stable solution."

"The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of our policies and everything is managed through JCP. It's still among the positive aspects, and it's a valuable feature."

"Redirection is a key feature. It helps in managing multiple microservices by centralizing control and access."

"Cloud Pak for Integration is definitely scalable. That is the most important criteria."

"The most valuable aspect of the Cloud Pak, in general, is the flexibility that you have to use the product."

Cons

"API Gateway could improve by allowing debugging capabilities, particularly when dealing with high volumes. At scale, it is expensive, and latency sometimes occurs."

"The payment is a little bit on the costlier side when I look at the amount we have to pay."

"Amazon API Gateway can improve the user interface in some areas it could be more polished."

"We faced a few issues with the documentation."

"The pricing could be improved. In cases where customers require real-time sync or real-time calling groups with IoT, the volume of data and time lag become a concern."

"Amazon API Gateway needs to focus on minimizing latency."

"From a use cases perspective, you need to have an internal and external gateway. AWS can only handle external traffic so has to be used together with another solution."

"It would be useful to have a more complete development environment for the developer, with different integrative capabilities to manage all the life cycles for the API. I think the full version formula for that is really useful. They should improve the development environment for easier integration."

More Amazon API Gateway cons

"The initial setup is not easy."

"Its queuing and messaging features need improvement."

"Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent."

"Setting up Cloud Pak for Integration is relatively complex. It's not as easy because it has not yet been fully integrated. You still have some products that are still not containerized, so you still have to run them on a dedicated VM."

"The pricing can be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing is cheap and based on the number of requests coming to Amazon API Gateway."

"Since it's a serverless solution, Amazon API Gateway is not so expensive."

"We use all open-source technology."

"Amazon API Gateway has various pricing plans, but I cannot give the exact cost, though I can say that it's expensive. On a scale of one to five, I'd rate the pricing for Amazon API Gateway as two, as the solution is one of the most expensive products in the market for API management."

"I rate the tool's price as seven on a scale of one to ten, where one means low price and ten means high price."

"Azure products are more cost-effective than AWS solutions"

"The product can be described as a medium-priced solution, but its cost is higher than Azure."

"There is an annual licensing cost to use Amazon API Gateway."

More Amazon API Gateway pricing and cost advice

"The solution's pricing model is very flexible."

"It is an expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Apigee or Amazon API Gateway?

Amazon API Gateway is a platform that supports the creation and publication of API for web applications. The platform can support thousands of simultaneous API calls, and it provides monitoring, ma...

How does Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager compare with Amazon API Gateway?

I have found that Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager is the best integration tool out there for API management. It is easy to implement and learn; it provides several options for deployment, (including ...

Which is better - Azure API Management or Amazon API Gateway?

If you use Azure products, API Management is a great solution. It solves many of the problems of externalizing web services. For example, when you need versioning, establish a developer portal and ...

What do you like most about IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of ...

What needs improvement with IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent.

What is your primary use case for IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

It manages APIs and integrates microservices at the enterprise level. It offers a range of capabilities for handling APIs, microservices, and various integration needs. The platform supports thousa...

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Amazon API Gateway

Comparisons

Compared 60% of the time

Apigee vs Amazon API Gateway

Compared 6% of the time

WSO2 API Manager vs Amazon API Gateway

Compared 4% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Amazon API Gateway

Compared 4% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Amazon API Gateway

Compared 4% of the time

More Amazon API Gateway Competitors

IBM App Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 45% of the time

IBM API Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 15% of the time

IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 7% of the time

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 7% of the time

AWS Glue vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Competitors

Product Reports

Amazon API Gateway

Download Amazon API Gateway product report

API Management

Download IBM Cloud Pak for Integration product report

Overview

Amazon API Gateway facilitates internal APIs exposure to external users, manages requests, and enhances security with authentication. It efficiently handles serverless architectures with AWS Lambda integration, supporting cloud-based API management.

Amazon API Gateway acts as a gateway for backend microservices, making it suitable for real-time use cases. It enables secure communication, traffic routing, and access control management. With its strength in integrating AWS services, it offers excellent scalability, proxy capabilities, and cost-effective management. Users have noted areas for improvement, such as pricing, interface, and the need for better AI-based capabilities. Improvements are also sought in monitoring, security features, and support services.

What features make Amazon API Gateway stand out?

Proxy Capabilities: Facilitates unified API access and management
AWS Lambda Integration: Seamlessly connects with serverless architectures
Authentication: Provides robust security through authentication measures
SQL Injection Prevention: Ensures secure API interactions
Custom Domain Assignment: Supports personalized API endpoints
Multi-Region Connectivity: Offers global reach and low latency

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Scalability: Handles large-scale integrations efficiently
Cost-Effectiveness: Offers budget-friendly management options
Security: Strong measures to protect data and APIs
Ease of Management: Provides intuitive management features
Efficient Endpoint Management: Streamlines the API lifecycle

Industries utilize Amazon API Gateway to streamline operations in sectors like finance, healthcare, and tech, focusing on real-time data processing and secure communication. The gateway's ability to manage traffic and provide robust security features is key in industries requiring dependable and versatile API management solutions.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration gives you complete, flexible integration using capabilities you need to move at today's speed of business, including the tools to help you achieve your application modernization goals as part of your journey to the cloud.

IBM

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Fox Digital Consumer Group, iFlix, UK Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA), Miovision, Olympusat, PhotoVogue, Royale International Group, Veracode

CVS Health Corporation

Amazon API Gateway vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration