

Apigee and Amazon API Gateway are competitors in the API management category. Apigee is often perceived as more feature-rich, attracting large enterprises, while Amazon API Gateway appeals to a broader user base due to its cost-effectiveness.
Features: Apigee provides comprehensive API management with an emphasis on analytics, developer portals, and monetization, supported by its Smart Docs feature for API documentation simplification. Amazon API Gateway is deeply integrated with AWS services, making it user-friendly for AWS users, and provides essential features for basic API management along with strong integration capabilities with AWS Lambda.
Room for Improvement: Apigee users look for better role-based access management, enhanced integration with code versioning systems, and improved monitoring tools. Users also desire a streamlined installation process. Amazon API Gateway users suggest improvements in user interface, monitoring, and documentation quality for a more polished experience.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apigee offers flexible deployment options including on-premises, hybrid cloud, and private cloud setups, though users report inconsistent technical support and response times. Amazon API Gateway benefits from seamless AWS integration, valued for its public cloud deployment, though users note documentation and interface improvements are needed.
Pricing and ROI: Apigee is known for its high cost aligned with its robust feature set, often chosen by enterprises needing extensive integration and API management for significant ROI. Amazon API Gateway's flexible, volume-based pricing is seen as cost-effective, enabling businesses to pay only for usage, thus appealing to those seeking cost control and scalability.
API Gateway saves time and secures my infrastructure, allowing effective deployment.
Technical support is excellent, deserving a ten out of ten rating.
We benefit from enterprise support, ensuring prompt responses from the technical support team.
We encountered challenges accessing technical support channels, such as a need for a clear telephone number and chat sessions.
They are responsive and provide assistance even during production issues.
The customer service and support are cooperative and effective in providing insights and solutions during challenges.
In the past two years, I have been experiencing less assistance.
There are one hundred thousand users using it in our company.
We have thousands of end users accessing our solution built on API Gateway.
Being a fully managed service, it offers auto-scalability and management by AWS.
Adding extra Cassandra databases is complex.
I've deployed it for a client with millions of users without issues.
Our applications are stable, owing partly to our architecture, which is spread across three regions.
I would rate its stability as nine out of ten.
Apigee is stable, and we have had the system running on Apigee servers for more than four years without any stability issues.
A local version of the API Gateway would be beneficial for testing purposes without incurring extra costs.
We use a lot of TerraForm scripts to build up our environment.
I would like to see more AI-based capabilities in future releases.
Apigee only allows validation of transactions up to a four-hour period, which requires manual hovering over the date and time.
Analytics is one of the areas needing enhancement, specifically more visibility and control over traffic to improve capacity management and high availability.
Apigee should also incorporate these capabilities, especially in the on-premises version.
However, my understanding is that it easily goes to $14,000 or $15,000 USD each month for each account, and we have several such accounts.
It is a really cheap product, but if used incorrectly, it can become expensive.
It is expensive.
Apigee is perceived as slightly costly compared to other tools in the market.
Apigee is high-priced, suitable for large enterprises where the benefit aligns with the cost.
Apigee is costlier compared to other solutions.
The solution is solid, robust, and scalable.
The tool's most valuable aspect is its scalability.
works well for defining different states for different customers based on their purchase plans
It provides all the necessary capabilities for current technologies, enabling communication and translation between protocols, along with supporting stringent security features.
The features for API security have been significant with Apigee.
Apigee provides catalog management, onboarding of new customers, an API portal, and security features.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Amazon API Gateway | 12.1% |
| Apigee | 8.3% |
| Other | 79.6% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 21 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 65 |
Amazon API Gateway stands out for its seamless integration with AWS, ease of use, scalability, and support for secure API management, benefiting from a serverless architecture that helps control costs while ensuring efficient backend connectivity.
Amazon API Gateway offers significant capabilities for managing APIs, integrating smoothly with AWS Lambda for serverless operations. It provides robust security with authentication, authorization, and input validation. The gateway supports API traffic management, rate limiting, and enhances accessibility while facing areas for potential improvements in pricing, documentation, interface usability, monitoring, security, latency, analytics, and debugging tools. Expanded integration features and AI-based development aids are desirable.
What features make Amazon API Gateway effective?Amazon API Gateway is frequently employed in industries like mobile development and public services to ensure secure, efficient interactions between front-end and back-end systems. It's instrumental in managing APIs, integrating microservices, and offering controlled API access, notably in environments requiring robust security and service exposure.
Apigee is a platform for developing and managing APIs. Apigee offers an interface for your core services by wrapping them with a proxy layer which is then accessed by other developers. With Apigee, you can design and build APIs and then securely share their services and data without exposing any code.
Because app developers make HTTP requests to an API proxy rather than directly to your services, your services are separated from the developers. All the developer needs to know is the URL of the API proxy endpoint, necessary query parameters, authorization credentials (if they exist), and the response data format.
The API proxy isolates the app developer from your backend service. Therefore, you are free to change the service implementation if the public API remains consistent. By maintaining a consistent frontend API, existing client apps will continue to work regardless of changes on the backend.
Key capabilities of the Apigee API management platform include:
Reviews from Real Users:
Apigee stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Several major ones are its rich developer portal, its advanced analytics, and its central monitoring system.
Carlos R., a software architect at Caja Los Andes writes, “The central monitoring feature is the most valuable. It also provides security for the APIs and high availability for our use cases. Apigee is the best product in the industry in comparison to other API management solutions. It helps in fast development, which is a top point. It also supports a lot of industry standards and has excellent documentation.”
An associate vice president at a tech services company notes, “The analytics function and the developer portal are the two valuable features of Apigee. The analytics part is very good, and the developer portal is quite rich in features. The authentication mechanisms are quite easily built into Apigee, which is something that most of the other products have also now started supporting.”
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.