We performed a comparison between Alluvio Aternity and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two DEM - Digital Experience Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The data the solution provides is valuable to us; we can see the health of the machines, how they are performing, and what might be causing issues on a particular machine."
"Aternity easily provides visibility of all the endpoint machines to my clients."
"There are many valuable features. If I had to single out one, it would be the UXI score. That's a proprietary Aternity score that tells you how good or bad the experience is for a user on that particular machine, for a particular app. It neatly encapsulates the pain of the user in a single score. It's very easy to find issues and then drill down further into those issues, based on that score."
"The most valuable feature of Alluvio Aternity is the compiling and displaying of end-user data so that we can utilize it to troubleshoot proactively."
"Alluvio Aternity is stable."
"The ability to quickly utilize the dashboard to gather information is valuable from a DXI perspective."
"Recently, Splunk upgraded to version 9.0.02, which includes excellent data dashboards and visualization effects."
"I like Splunk's data aggregation and search capabilities."
"You can integrate Splunk with third-party security automation solutions and set rules for automatic response."
"It is very scalable."
"Exporting is a good feature. It helps me out when I have to do reports. I do a lot of exporting and crunching of the numbers. Dashboards are okay for showing to the leadership, but for doing statistics and updating tickets, the export feature is very beneficial for me."
"Integration with the cloud is pretty important and good for us. We found the integration with a lot of tools, not all tools yet, valuable. It does make the transfer of data, log files, and other things easier for us."
"The indexing and data collection are valuable."
"Splunk would be my choice for the presentation layer because it comes with inbuilt reports and a dashboard that you can customize."
"I would like Alluvio Aternity to be certified by the IRAP for petrol companies in Australia."
"The solution's downloadable reports could be improved."
"The solution is available at a higher price than other solutions."
"The licensing model doesn't suit the market we are in and has room for improvement."
"I want more reporting around asset management, with greater flexibility and customization ability."
"I would like to see more granular performance counters collected and viewable from the endpoints. That would be great."
"Its user interface for everything other than the charts can be improved. Some parts of it can be simplified a bit, such as when importing documents that have the network traffic. When you're going through the information about the network traffic, you have to have the expertise, but even if a program is supposed to be for IT support, it is good to make it user-friendly because it gets easier to train people. When something goes wrong, the more difficult a program is in terms of UI, the harder it is to fix the issue."
"Splunk is more expensive than other solutions."
"The threat detection system has room for improvement."
"They can incorporate the SOAR solution within the actual product so that we do not require two different products, two different installations, and two different pricing methods. In regards to UBA, I am familiar with the UBA that existed two years ago. I am not updated about it today, but two years ago, UBA required such an amount of data that from a cost perspective, it was not worth it. When you compare it to what you get out of the box with Microsoft Sentinel without additional costs, there is no match."
"Splunk is very expensive. The license is based on the volume of the logs ingested. I was responsible for managing the contract with our service integrator. I don't know the precise details of the competing solution, but I have heard that Splunk is more expensive than others. I don't know what the going rate is on the market, but I think there are at least two competitors that are less expensive. We have experienced a few issues with our service providers in terms of log filtering and ingestion, so we continue to pay a bit more per day for our logs."
"Splunk can improve its third-party device application plugins."
". Having a trial version or more training on Splunk would be helpful."
"It will be helpful for customers if they can create some real-world cases, and we can find a case study to align with. I know that Splunk has tremendous potential. We only include a tiny piece of it. There is a lot of stuff that we need to learn. If Splunk can provide more real-time examples, that will be helpful for customers."
Alluvio Aternity is ranked 4th in DEM - Digital Experience Monitoring with 6 reviews while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 1st in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 76 reviews. Alluvio Aternity is rated 8.2, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Alluvio Aternity writes "Enables us to be a lot more agile and proactive in troubleshooting endpoint issues thanks to accurate UX scoring". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "Can be used to find any threats or vulnerabilities inside a user’s environment". Alluvio Aternity is most compared with Dynatrace, Nexthink, AppDynamics, SysTrack and Azure Monitor, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, Dynatrace, Microsoft Sentinel, IBM Security QRadar and Elastic Security. See our Alluvio Aternity vs. Splunk Enterprise Security report.
We monitor all DEM - Digital Experience Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.