Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs iServer comparison

Software AG and Orbus Software are both solutions in the Enterprise Architecture Management category. Software AG is ranked #18, while Orbus Software is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. Software AG holds a 2.6% mindshare in AM, compared to Orbus Software’s 4.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Software AG users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Orbus Software users who would recommend it.

Alfabet Enterprise Architec...

Read 3 Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management reviews

709 Views
709 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

iServer

Read 18 iServer reviews

2,537 Views
1,801 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Alfabet Enterprise Architec...

iServer

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

iServer and Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management provide enterprise architecture solutions. iServer typically excels in affordability and support, while Alfabet stands out with its extensive features for those who value capability over cost.

Features: iServer is known for its ease of use and customizable options allowing organizations to tailor their systems to specific needs. Its flexible interface supports various architectural models. Alfabet offers advanced features with comprehensive integration capabilities, robust modeling power, and detailed architecture management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: iServer ensures a smoother deployment process, aided by effective and responsive customer service, which facilitates quick adaptation and fewer disruptions. Alfabet's deployment process may be more intricate, requiring additional time and support, but professional service assists in navigating complex implementations.

Pricing and ROI: iServer is often more affordable, providing higher ROI through lower setup costs, making it suitable for cost-conscious organizations. Alfabet demands a higher initial investment, yet offers strong ROI for those leveraging its extensive feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs. iServer Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs. iServer

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 864,155 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Alfabet Enterprise Architec...

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

18th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

iServer

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

8th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Enterprise Architecture Management category, the mindshare of Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management is 2.6%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of iServer is 4.5%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Architecture Management

Featured Reviews

AlanJackson

Partner: Enterprise Strategy & Advisory at Wipro Limited

Great taxonomy support but raw business processing should be upgraded

Alfabet is not just a technology tool, it's also a business tool. And if a decision's made without the business involved, then Alfabet will not be in a position to deliver anything more than support for enterprise architect drawings and solutions drawings. It has to be the business. If you do that, it works well. If you don't and I've had the experience where they haven't evolved a business, then it just becomes a tech tool that the business doesn't care about. The stigma of having an environment that was so delayed in the maintenance caused lots of finger-pointing within the organization of who was right and who was wrong. It took a considerable period of time to move people past that point to actually look at it as a business tool supported by the technology team. I rate the solution seven out of 10.

Read full review

Antonios Lazanakis

Senior IT Solution Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Flexible, easy to use, and easy to import data

We use iServer to establish an enterprise architecture function in our organization iServer is a very flexible platform for defining your own enterprise architecture model. It is very easy to import data, and we also have good integration with Visual Drawing Tools and SharePoint. The solution is…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup was straightforward. It takes two to three days to set up the environment. One person was able to handle the implementation."

"The taxonomy support across all the phases is the most advantageous feature."

"The most valuable features of this solution are its customizability, and flexibility in the configuration."

"Tech support is very responsive. They solved issues within a prompt response time."

"There were lots of different requirements, and collaboration and review is one of the biggest things. There is also Office 360 integration, and there's flexibility to use it as a database as well."

"The initial setup is easy."

"This is a flexible tool compared to some other solutions."

"iServer is a solution that helps catalog enterprise architect solutions and catalog information."

"Integrating the Microsoft documents to the product and visualization matrix where we can see the end-to-end relationship of the network is of great importance to our company."

"iServer is a very flexible platform for defining your own enterprise architecture model."

"The most valuable feature is its reporting capability. It offers various packages for different types of reports, such as business and project management reporting packs."

More iServer pros

Cons

"We would like to see the visualization of assets, as well as artificial intelligence techniques to assist us in making our decisions."

"The user experience, the layout and the different technologies behind the presentations are a bit old. These need to be updated. They should focus on web development. It's simply not supporting the current user experience guidelines."

"The product is not great at implementing security frameworks across an end-to-end supply chain."

"Requirements management needs to be improved."

"The migration tool needs to be included in the main package, and not as a separate license."

"iServer is a solid tool. Occasionally, we needed to contact the vendor to clarify details such as porting issues, missing components, and model specifics."

"There can be some performance issues using the solution that should be improved. When you make modifications modify to files there are embedded data within that can take a while to process."

"Enhancing integration options with ERP or ITSM-related solutions for triggering automated requests for process definitions, changes, and tracking them in the iServer."

"The one issue is that if you want to import predefined work, you need to put the licensing model in. So if you wanted to import work that was done before, you then need to buy a separate product for that."

"The product is more expensive than Spark."

"iServer should invest in enhancing the capabilities of the embedded drawing tool, draw.io."

More iServer cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The price of iServer is reasonable compared to other solutions."

"The product has a moderate pricing."

"The solution is cheaper than its competitors."

"Aim for the exact number of people who shall define/review approve and view the processes, as it will impact the cost."

"It's about 13K to set up and 9K for the license for three months. I think it's about 20K a year, but we haven't firmed up on pricing yet because the price depends on how long we commit to the solution."

"They offer annual subscriptions for developing countries, which are not affordable for small or medium businesses."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,155 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Government

13%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about iServer?

iServer has valuable features for workflow and document management.

See all answers

What needs improvement with iServer?

iServer should invest in enhancing the capabilities of the embedded drawing tool, draw.io. draw.io is a drawing tool used to draw architectural diagrams, flow diagrams, etc. It is an alternative to...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for iServer?

We use iServer to establish an enterprise architecture function in our organization.

See all answers

Comparisons

LeanIX vs Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management

Compared 34% of the time

BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management

Compared 32% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management

Compared 14% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management

Compared 9% of the time

More Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management Competitors

LeanIX vs iServer

Compared 24% of the time

OrbusInfinity vs iServer

Compared 15% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs iServer

Compared 12% of the time

BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs iServer

Compared 9% of the time

ADOIT vs iServer

Compared 2% of the time

More iServer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Architecture Management

July 2025

Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management report

Download Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Architecture Management

July 2025

Download iServer product report

Overview

Software AG's Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management Platform provides a collaborative platform for aligning the IT landscape with the business to guide competitive transformation. You can describe complex IT systems in terms of their business, application, information and technical layers, and develop standards for change. Build the foundation for business-IT transformation with an accurate, real-time picture of the IT landscape, including all applications and technologies, the inter-relationships between them, the information they exchange as well as the business organizations and processes they support.

Software AG

iServer is a unified software platform and enterprise modeling environment that extends and enhances the familiar, market leading Microsoft Visio and Office products. Core capabilities provided by iServer include an enhanced Microsoft Visio diagramming interface, a powerful central repository for all enterprise architecture or business process models and documentation, and a range of tools for visualization, analysis and decision making.

Orbus Software

Sample Customers

Metro Bank, Credit Suisse

Barclays, Cathay Pacific, Deloitte, British Gas, MasterCard

Buyer's Guide

Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs. iServer

July 2025

Free Report: Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs. iServer

Find out what your peers are saying about Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs. iServer and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

864,155 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs. iServer report.

See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.