Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs erwin Evolve comparison

Software AG and Quest Software are both solutions in the Enterprise Architecture Management category. Software AG is ranked #16, while Quest Software is ranked #14. Software AG holds a 2.5% mindshare in AM, compared to Quest Software’s 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Software AG users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

Alfabet Enterprise Architec...

Read 3 Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management reviews

736 Views
736 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

erwin Evolve

Read 19 erwin Evolve reviews

1,520 Views
1,064 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Alfabet Enterprise Architec...

erwin Evolve

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

erwin Evolve and Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management compete in enterprise architecture management, focusing on optimizing organizational processes and IT infrastructure. erwin Evolve is recognized for its cost-effectiveness and support, while Alfabet is favored for its comprehensive features appealing to those prioritizing functionality.

Features: erwin Evolve offers integrated modeling and design, collaboration tools, and efficient process streamlining. Alfabet provides comprehensive roadmap planning, advanced analytics, and extensive IT system integration support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: erwin Evolve provides simple deployment with dedicated support, ideal for smooth transitions during new implementations. Alfabet offers complex deployments suited for large organizations with comprehensive IT management requirements, backed by responsive service.

Pricing and ROI: erwin Evolve presents a cost-effective solution with quick ROI due to lower pricing and efficient support. Alfabet requires a higher initial investment, with ROI achieved over time through its extensive features, making it suitable for those focused on strategic IT capabilities and long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs. erwin Evolve Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs. erwin Evolve

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Alfabet Enterprise Architec...

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

16th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

erwin Evolve

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Enterprise Architecture Management category, the mindshare of Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management is 2.5%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of erwin Evolve is 3.4%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Architecture Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
erwin Evolve	3.4%
Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management	2.5%
Other	94.1%

Enterprise Architecture Management

Featured Reviews

AlanJackson

Partner: Enterprise Strategy & Advisory at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Great taxonomy support but raw business processing should be upgraded

Alfabet is not just a technology tool, it's also a business tool. And if a decision's made without the business involved, then Alfabet will not be in a position to deliver anything more than support for enterprise architect drawings and solutions drawings. It has to be the business. If you do that, it works well. If you don't and I've had the experience where they haven't evolved a business, then it just becomes a tech tool that the business doesn't care about. The stigma of having an environment that was so delayed in the maintenance caused lots of finger-pointing within the organization of who was right and who was wrong. It took a considerable period of time to move people past that point to actually look at it as a business tool supported by the technology team. I rate the solution seven out of 10.

Read full review

Asish Sahu

SPM at Infosys

The reverse engineering capabilities are quite useful.

Evolve is primarily focused on the entity's licenses diagrams, but it would be nice if erwin could integrate case development, so that it shows the ER diagram plus certain inputs on the use cases and how the data is used. That deviates somewhat from the overall scope, so maybe they could call it a different product.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup was straightforward. It takes two to three days to set up the environment. One person was able to handle the implementation."

"The taxonomy support across all the phases is the most advantageous feature."

"The most valuable features of this solution are its customizability, and flexibility in the configuration."

"We can efficiently deploy business models into the databases and generate SQL scripts."

"I can send images in the PDF form, along with the relationships and the associations that are a very important part of what we do. It can show what is affected and what is impacted by a certain change in one area of the system architecture or enterprise architecture. I can very quickly draw those issues and topics to the fore."

"Forward and reverse engineering were valuable features."

"One of the most valuable features is the website that sits on top of the database. There's a database of objects and how they are related, and you can make views and diagrams and visual elements out of that information on the website. The website is the part that is called Evolve and we use the Evolve Designer and publish the website out to our employees. They can click around and navigate and search, etc."

"The feature that stands out for me is the ease of configuring objects and the screens to show them. It's really easy to add a new type of object in this reference. Creating a new type of object, using it, and evolving it a little bit in terms of what we can document about it are the main features that made us decide to use this provider."

"You can use different kinds of diagrams to represent the architecture setting."

"I have not seen capabilities for web-sharing and interaction with the architecture from any other supplier. It's a great capability..."

"There is a model behind it. It's really nice that the Evolve front-end, as it builds a website, keeps those relationships in mind. You can even go to a procedure and see all the applications that are related to it. Then you can go into that application and see all the standard operating procedures that that application is a part of. It's just very connected."

More erwin Evolve pros

Cons

"The product is not great at implementing security frameworks across an end-to-end supply chain."

"The user experience, the layout and the different technologies behind the presentations are a bit old. These need to be updated. They should focus on web development. It's simply not supporting the current user experience guidelines."

"We would like to see the visualization of assets, as well as artificial intelligence techniques to assist us in making our decisions."

"With the Excel importing, the "up to date" part is the challenge. If we had a real-time integration, we could keep things up to date for whatever kinds of change points we had. With Excel, it is more that you have to export from one system then import it to another, so it's better for data that doesn't change that often."

"I would like it to be easier to make changes and then deploy them into production, especially when you have multiple web servers or front-ends. It would be nice to make a change and then have it propagate to the production servers in a more automated fashion."

"Evolve is primarily focused on the entity's licenses diagrams, but it would be nice if erwin could integrate case development, so that it shows the ER diagram plus certain inputs on the use cases and how the data is used. That deviates somewhat from the overall scope, so maybe they could call it a different product."

"I would like to see an improvement in the output of the solution."

"There might be improvement required to better support some of the MPP databases for non-relational data structures and NoSQL databases."

"Add some ability to do conditional Visualization on the models and in reports (some ideas) – maybe as a specialized Theme or Diagram or Display."

"If it had fewer features to model all kinds of architecture, it would be less complicated."

"The way that we are using it for application management, we have several KPIs. We want to follow and monitor them regarding a number of solutions. We cannot calculate this today. We would like real-time calculations along with the KPIs in order to improve the user experience. We would like the tool to be able to display this, not only as signals, but as charts."

More erwin Evolve cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The cost is something like $15,000, per license. But I haven't looked at those numbers in three years. It was over $100,000 to initially set everything up and get it all configured."

"I think erwin is quite expensive. I have difficulty selling the portal, in fact."

"Unless you are a one person shop – always go with the Workgroup edition and Concurrent licensing."

"The licensing enables you to differentiate between people who edit the content and the people who consume it. We are able to keep the licensing costs down by keeping the "contributor" licenses to a minimum, and we then just roll out the content in a read-only version for the rest of our users."

"On a yearly basis, our licensing costs are 50,000 euro. There are no additional costs because we are on a SaaS model."

"Yearly, our cost is €100,000."

"I estimate that we pay between $40,000 and $50,000 a year for the solution, not including the upfront costs to buy things the first time."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Computer Software Company

20%

Performing Arts

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	12

Comparisons

LeanIX vs Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management

Compared 30% of the time

BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management

Compared 11% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management

Compared 10% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management

Compared 10% of the time

OrbusInfinity vs Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management

Compared 5% of the time

More Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management Competitors

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs erwin Evolve

Compared 14% of the time

IDERA ER/Studio vs erwin Evolve

Compared 8% of the time

SAP PowerDesigner vs erwin Evolve

Compared 8% of the time

erwin Data Modeler vs erwin Evolve

Compared 7% of the time

OrbusInfinity vs erwin Evolve

Compared 4% of the time

More erwin Evolve Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Architecture Management

November 2025

Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management report

Download Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management product report

Buyer's Guide

erwin Evolve

December 2025

Download erwin Evolve product report

Also Known As

No data available

erwin EA, erwin Business Process, erwin Enterprise Architecture

Overview

Software AG's Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management Platform provides a collaborative platform for aligning the IT landscape with the business to guide competitive transformation. You can describe complex IT systems in terms of their business, application, information and technical layers, and develop standards for change. Build the foundation for business-IT transformation with an accurate, real-time picture of the IT landscape, including all applications and technologies, the inter-relationships between them, the information they exchange as well as the business organizations and processes they support.

Software AG

erwin Evolve provides comprehensive graphical support for handling large data models. It offers features such as metadata access, version control, and model comparison, enhancing operational reports and system analytics through its collaborative web-driven design.

erwin Evolve facilitates reverse engineering and database integration, fostering collaboration and process exploration through its web interface. Customizable and easy to configure, it supports workflow configuration and architectural modeling. Users can utilize its capabilities for developing industry models, managing transformation programs, and presenting standard operating procedures. Despite its strengths, there are demands for improved integration, enhanced UML support, and a more modern user experience. Users also express challenges with legacy system updates and call for better connectors and collaborative features.

What are the key features of erwin Evolve?

Graphical Support for Large Data Models: Provides visualization capabilities for complex data structures.
Metadata Access via API: Allows integration and management of metadata across platforms.
Version Control and Model Comparison: Enhances tracking and analysis of model changes.
Collaborative Web Interface: Facilitates teamwork and process exploration remotely.
Architectural Modeling: Supports the design and configuration of enterprise architecture.

What are the benefits and ROI of using erwin Evolve?

Customization and Ease of Configuration: Reduces setup time and adapts to specific organizational workflows.
Enhanced Accessibility and Mobile Usability: Offers access to critical information on the go.
Operational Reports Creation: Generates insights and facilitates informed decision-making.
System Analytics Handling: Provides robust tools for analyzing system performance and integration.

Data-driven organizations in sectors like finance and healthcare implement erwin Evolve for data warehousing, enterprise architecture, and business process modeling. They leverage its capabilities for cataloging architectural elements, linking to CMDBs, analyzing system interfaces, and describing business processes. Utilization extends to IT solution registration, business capability planning, and strategic modeling, with frequent deployments on cloud platforms to support transformation initiatives.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Metro Bank, Credit Suisse

AT&T, Bank of America, Chevron, Duke University, ESPN, Fidelity, GE, JP Morgan Chase, KPMG, McGraw Hill, NASA, Pfizer, Royal Bank of Scotland, Teradata, Union Pacific, Vodafone, Wells Fargo.

Buyer's Guide

Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs. erwin Evolve

December 2025

Free Report: Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs. erwin Evolve

Find out what your peers are saying about Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs. erwin Evolve and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs. erwin Evolve report.

See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.