Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs LeanIX comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
LeanIX Logo
7,981 views|3,581 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management and LeanIX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Architecture Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The initial setup was straightforward. It takes two to three days to set up the environment. One person was able to handle the implementation.""The most valuable features of this solution are its customizability, and flexibility in the configuration.""The taxonomy support across all the phases is the most advantageous feature."

More Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management Pros →

"LeanIX has good usability and stability. This SaaS is intuitive, easy to use, and comes with a nice reporting feature.""The solution has a very useful assessment tool that automatically populates from input data to produce a detailed analysis of customer's environments.""The ability to import data and generate reports from it. That's where its power lies.""One of the product's most valuable features is its ability to configure hardware devices.""Interfaces well with downstream systems of data.""I like the tool’s integration and maps.""We've been able to develop some nice looking reports, and the dashboard's capability to map is very easy compared to Enterprise Architect.""The most valuable feature would be application portfolio management, which is where they came from, but over time, they have got artificial intelligence. They built up a very good repository. If I identify a system by name, from historical information, oftentimes, they can tell me that this is deployed with this number of CPUs and they can give me a really good profile of the application for me to put it into a change management database with very little effort."

More LeanIX Pros →

Cons
"The user experience, the layout and the different technologies behind the presentations are a bit old. These need to be updated. They should focus on web development. It's simply not supporting the current user experience guidelines.""We would like to see the visualization of assets, as well as artificial intelligence techniques to assist us in making our decisions.""The product is not great at implementing security frameworks across an end-to-end supply chain."

More Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management Cons →

"Does a poor job of being able to allocate detailed costings to components within the network.""It's hard to predict the pricing of the system.""They're probably positioned pretty well. I hope that they would not focus that much on the business architecture, and they would focus more on the overall cloud strategy and how we can leverage multi-cloud and transition back and forth from other cloud providers. With a lot of current vendors, you get locked in with one cloud, and then you try to migrate to someone else, and it becomes very problematic. What they need to do is to look at the overall data strategy, and they probably need to amplify their data strategy, especially around multi-cloud.""It would be beneficial to have additional features and capabilities to enhance mapping between applications, especially across domains where the relationships may not be direct.""Report generation could be more detailed. There are some shortcomings when creating reports. We can't create tag-based reports or go beyond basic technical reports.""They should improve the out of the box connectors that they provide. They should see if clients are really ready to adapt them.""The initial setup has room for improvement.""What would make LeanIX better is more variety in terms of reporting, and more flexibility with its data importing feature."

More LeanIX Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "As the tool is cloud-based, its cost is more affordable."
  • "The solution's pricing is based on a licensing model that is competitive and in line with other products."
  • "There is a sweet spot of where they need to be on pricing right now. They could go up a little bit in pricing, but it has to do with the cost savings, and it has to do with the practitioners using it. I use it where I get cost savings and I can justify it, but they probably have the ability to flex a 10% up channel on their sales on that. So, they could increase their settle price, not their offering price, when they sell. They can probably hold that up a little bit higher than it is because there are cost savings that we can drive from it."
  • "The tool needs to include more flexible licensing options. We do not use the tool all the time. So pricing should be considered only when we use the tool."
  • "I would rate the pricing a one out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
  • "The pricing is very good. We definitely get good value for the money."
  • More LeanIX Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The taxonomy support across all the phases is the most advantageous feature.
    Top Answer:The ability for Alfabet to acknowledge use cases that are specifically business-based and not technology-based and better integrate those process designs across the spectrum could be improved. The… more »
    Top Answer:I work for a systems integrator and we are end users. Organizations using this product are enterprise-size, our largest customer has 30,000 users. One customer had use cases built on sourcing raw… more »
    Top Answer:Hi @Cheryl Joseph ​Looking at the crossover between Project and Portfolio management with EA, then Planview could be a good choice. If looking at Portfolio Management from an EA perspective then… more »
    Top Answer:The ability to import data and generate reports from it. That's where its power lies.
    Top Answer:The pricing is very good. We definitely get good value for the money.
    Ranking
    Views
    963
    Comparisons
    665
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    776
    Rating
    7.0
    Views
    7,981
    Comparisons
    3,581
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    474
    Rating
    8.8
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Software AG's Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management Platform provides a collaborative platform for aligning the IT landscape with the business to guide competitive transformation. You can describe complex IT systems in terms of their business, application, information and technical layers, and develop standards for change. Build the foundation for business-IT transformation with an accurate, real-time picture of the IT landscape, including all applications and technologies, the inter-relationships between them, the information they exchange as well as the business organizations and processes they support.

    LeanIX delivers collaborative Enterprise Architecture designed for modern IT. Our open, data-driven architecture management model helps organizations adapt to the evolving demands of digital. From agile to multi-cloud and beyond, architecture teams using LeanIX have the power to strategically support the business and report 45% reduction in time to value delivery. More than 90,000 users across enterprises worldwide rely on LeanIX to manage their IT landscape, including adidas, Bosch, 7Eleven, and Zalando.

    Sample Customers
    Metro Bank, Credit Suisse
    adidas, Bosch, Chico's, Haworth, Helvetia, KuKa, Osram, Telekom, TUI, Santander, Swarovski, Vaillant, 7Eleven, and Zalando.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government15%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Insurance Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Insurance Company6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise44%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Architecture Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management. Updated: April 2024.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management is ranked 13th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 3 reviews while LeanIX is ranked 1st in Enterprise Architecture Management with 16 reviews. Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management is rated 7.6, while LeanIX is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management writes "Great taxonomy support but raw business processing should be upgraded". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LeanIX writes "Streamlines the process of identifying apps nearing end-of-life or requiring retirement and facilitates informed decisions about app retention". Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management is most compared with MEGA HOPEX, iServer, BiZZdesign HoriZZon, Avolution ABACUS and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, whereas LeanIX is most compared with ServiceNow, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, MEGA HOPEX, ADOIT and BiZZdesign HoriZZon.

    See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.