"The installation process is very easy."
"The installation process is nice and easy."
"The Artificial Intelligence on offer is very useful."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"We are very satisfied with the performance."
"The features aren't much different than those in Aruba, but deployment is easier to configure and the pricing is better."
"Cisco is one of the leading vendors and is at the top of many lists. The access software is robust, and the performance of the devices is excellent."
"The most important thing for me is that all the access points are in one group and use one access code. So, when you move from one area to another, you don't disconnect and reconnect again. The device is also very easy to install and control."
"It is a stable solution."
"The speed and security are most valuable."
"I like that Cisco Wireless is easy to implement. If you get stuck with any issues, they have ample documentation on the internet. It's easy to implement, and Cisco documentation is easily accessible."
"The ability to make different types of networks, such as land networks, is the most valuable part of the solution."
"Cisco Wireless always has the latest technology that supports WiFi 5 and 6."
"The solution is highly scalable."
"We would prefer it if the solution could be less expensive."
"The solution could offer more integration with other products."
"The support on offer to other vendors switching - like Aruba or Ruckus - could be improved."
"There are occasional OS bugs."
"Better integration with third-party systems is what our customers are expecting in the future."
"If the customers plan to go on the cloud side, they need encryption and daily communications from a security perspective."
"The technical support could be better. They aren't as helpful as they need to be when we run into issues."
"In this part of the world, support is the weak side of this solution."
"The new licensing model isn't as good as what they had before."
"In the next release, they should add a better reporting feature. The reporting will tell you if you have a problem. That will make the diagnostics easier."
"It should be fully compatible with other devices."
"The price of Cisco Wireless could be lower."
"The installation is not too difficult but the solution could improve by making the configuration easier."
"The new GUI interface and the newer version OS are a little bit more complex than the older version, however, it just might take some getting used to."
Alcatel-Lucent OmniAccess Stellar is ranked 12th in Wireless LAN with 3 reviews while Cisco Wireless is ranked 3rd in Wireless LAN with 80 reviews. Alcatel-Lucent OmniAccess Stellar is rated 9.0, while Cisco Wireless is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Alcatel-Lucent OmniAccess Stellar writes "Easy to use from a single pane of glass and it integrates well with many systems". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Wireless writes "Robust with a good level of performance and very helpful technical support". Alcatel-Lucent OmniAccess Stellar is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Ubiquiti WLAN and Aruba Instant, whereas Cisco Wireless is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Ubiquiti WLAN and D-Link Wireless. See our Alcatel-Lucent OmniAccess Stellar vs. Cisco Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.