"The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"The simplicity is great."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"We are very satisfied with the performance."
"The features aren't much different than those in Aruba, but deployment is easier to configure and the pricing is better."
"The automatic VMware update is very useful because you don't have to worry about outages and planning for VMware updates. It is very advantageous from a management point of view. The ability to restrict and review the clients connected to each of our segments. Additionally, the solution is easy to use."
"Allows for cloud-based management of your Wi-Fi network."
"The most valuable features in Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN are that we were able to see all the registered users for each particular WAP, which is a big help. The roaming allows us to have continuous wireless throughout the building. The signal can carry over from one WAP to another. Which is probably the most important feature."
"It is more robust for me to deploy networks. And because of the field we are in where offices open up and others close, it helps my turnaround time to deploy these networks for the customers."
"The solution has worked very well in our campus environment."
"Great architecturally based dashboard and the solution is accessible from anywhere."
"What I liked about these is that they worked. I didn't touch them or do anything with them. They were up and running when I came here. Once they are set up and running, you don't have to worry about them."
"Its management is most valuable. It is the major feature of Meraki."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"Better integration with third-party systems is what our customers are expecting in the future."
"There are occasional OS bugs."
"If the customers plan to go on the cloud side, they need encryption and daily communications from a security perspective."
"Overall the solution needs to have more time to mature."
"We have used technical support for some issues but not many times."
"The licensing isn't very customer-centric. They may have improved it, but previously, if you forgot to pay on a certain day, your service would be shut off."
"There could be more functionality."
"The ease of use is average. It could be more user-friendly."
"I would like to see Cisco Meraki improve the accessibility by region level here in Latin America."
"They're great. If there's anything that they need to change, it is just simplifying the site to which you go to make changes on the admin side."
"Its price could be improved."
More Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Alcatel-Lucent OmniAccess Stellar Pricing and Cost Advice →
Alcatel-Lucent OmniAccess Stellar is ranked 15th in Wireless LAN with 3 reviews while Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ranked 2nd in Wireless LAN with 62 reviews. Alcatel-Lucent OmniAccess Stellar is rated 9.0, while Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Alcatel-Lucent OmniAccess Stellar writes "Easy to use from a single pane of glass and it integrates well with many systems". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN writes "Highly reliable, effective site blocking, and beneficial reports". Alcatel-Lucent OmniAccess Stellar is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Ubiquiti WLAN and Aruba Instant, whereas Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ubiquiti Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Ruckus Wireless and Mist AI and Cloud. See our Alcatel-Lucent OmniAccess Stellar vs. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
