Akamai Kona Site Defender vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Akamai Kona Site Defender and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Akamai Kona Site Defender vs. Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Report (Updated: May 2023).
709,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is the custom rules feature. This is because many of our customers require a lot of custom rules. Because it's a very customized project for our customers, I think they have the best of everything already.""I like that the charges are all based on usage and labor costs. For the time that we spend onboarding almost 252020 FQDN, Akamai charges us only for the traffic usage, but it's only charging us for the labor costs for onboarding.""The features are powerful and better than F5.""I can attest to its benefits in terms of understanding and mitigating threats...The solution's technical support team seems to be pretty responsive."

More Akamai Kona Site Defender Pros →

"Technical support has a very fast response time and they are helpful.""We like that there's load balancing, firewall capabilities, DDoS protection, et cetera, all covered by Cloudflare.""The Cloudflare Web Application Firewall's most valuable feature is its ease of configuration.""Does a good job preventing web application attacks.""Someone with a basic understanding of networking and security will be able to implement the firewall's basic features within 15 minutes."

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Pros →

Cons
"Support and the pricing need to improve.""Akamai needs to focus on quickly responding to risks, even those that may potentially be of zero threat..Maybe some of the documentation is a little confusing. They have a lot of different places where you can go to get information, and some of the information is quite out of date.""It would be better if there weren't any issues with latency. We had latency issues, but I think they are all solved now.""They are already very flexible, but room for improvement is there. Reports generation could be better and should be improved."

More Akamai Kona Site Defender Cons →

"They have some limitations with third-party integrations.""The accuracy of the Cloudflare Web Application Firewall could be improved by reducing the number of false-negative alerts.""It would be ideal if the solution offered better log integration and more integration with different platforms.""I have experienced some difficulties with Cloudflare's support as a customer based in India.""The reporting could be more granular."

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Akamai is very expensive."
  • "There is no license at all for Akamai. They are going to charge us only for the usage."
  • "The price they are offering is quite reasonable for premium customers, but it's very expensive if you're a small and medium-sized enterprises."
  • More Akamai Kona Site Defender Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The annual licensing fee is $10,000 USD."
  • "Cloudflare offers different types of subscriptions for businesses, enterprises, and personal users, and the pricing is negotiable."
  • More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
    709,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I can attest to its benefits in terms of understanding and mitigating threats...The solution's technical support team seems to be pretty responsive.
    Top Answer:In terms of improvement, from my point of view, it may seem a little selfish to comment as we focus on CVEs. On the other hand, Akamai addresses only the big pressing issues explicitly in their rule… more »
    Top Answer:I am currently working on a use case involving vulnerabilities and deferral requests made by individuals seeking to complete their remediation. These vulnerabilities are categorized and require an SLA… more »
    Top Answer:Someone with a basic understanding of networking and security will be able to implement the firewall's basic features within 15 minutes.
    Top Answer:In terms of the licensing cost perspective, it is a subscription-based pricing model. Usually, customers opt for a yearly subscription. However, I don't have a specific or exact figure on the actual… more »
    Top Answer:The additional features I wish to see in the next release include rate limiting on Cloudflare Web Application Firewall and advanced DDoS protection. The current product is highly explorable and does… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    7,418
    Comparisons
    5,916
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    712
    Rating
    8.3
    Views
    7,786
    Comparisons
    5,761
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    411
    Rating
    8.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Kona Site Defender, Kona
    Cloudflare WAF
    Learn More
    Overview
    Akamai's Kona Site Defender extends security beyond the data center while maintaining site performance and availability in the face of fast-changing threats. It leverages the power of the Akamai Intelligent Platform to detect, identify and mitigate Denial-of-Service (DoS) and Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attacks before they ever reach the origin.

    Cloudflare Web Application Firewall's intuitive dashboard enables users to build powerful rules through easy clicks and also provides Terraform integration. Every request to the WAF is inspected against the rule engine and the threat intelligence curated from protecting over 27 Million websites. Suspicious requests can be blocked, challenged or logged as per the needs of the user while legitimate requests are routed to the destination, agnostic of whether it lives on-premise or in the cloud. Analytics and Cloudflare Logs enable visibility into actionable metrics for the user.

    Offer
    Learn more about Akamai Kona Site Defender
    Learn more about Cloudflare Web Application Firewall
    Sample Customers
    AvidMobile, itBit
    crunchbase, udacity, marketo, okcupid, zendesk
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Leisure / Travel Company25%
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Retailer13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm29%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Insurance Company6%
    Retailer6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization20%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Large Enterprise73%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise72%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business57%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise29%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise31%
    Large Enterprise44%
    Buyer's Guide
    Akamai Kona Site Defender vs. Cloudflare Web Application Firewall
    May 2023
    Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai Kona Site Defender vs. Cloudflare Web Application Firewall and other solutions. Updated: May 2023.
    709,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Akamai Kona Site Defender is ranked 13th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 4 reviews while Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is ranked 14th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 5 reviews. Akamai Kona Site Defender is rated 8.4, while Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Akamai Kona Site Defender writes "A tool helpful for mitigating cyber threats while providing excellent technical support to its users ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall writes "Competitively priced with good support and very good reliability". Akamai Kona Site Defender is most compared with AWS WAF, Akamai Prolexic Routed, Akamai Web Application Protector, Cloudflare and Imperva Web Application Firewall, whereas Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is most compared with AWS WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Azure Front Door, Fortinet FortiWeb and Fastly. See our Akamai Kona Site Defender vs. Cloudflare Web Application Firewall report.

    See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

    We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.