AgilePoint vs Jitterbit Vinyl comparison

AgilePoint and Jitterbit are both solutions in the Rapid Application Development Software category. AgilePoint is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.3, while Jitterbit is ranked #28. AgilePoint holds a 0.5% mindshare in RADS, compared to Jitterbit’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of AgilePoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Jitterbit users who would recommend it.

AgilePoint

Read 6 AgilePoint reviews

490 Views
159 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Jitterbit Vinyl

Read 31 Jitterbit Vinyl reviews

966 Views
120 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AgilePoint

Jitterbit Vinyl

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

AgilePoint and Jitterbit Vinyl are enterprise-level software solutions for process automation and integration. AgilePoint excels in customer service and pricing, while Jitterbit Vinyl offers more robust features and higher perceived value at a higher price.

Features: AgilePoint offers comprehensive low-code automation, covering a wide range of business processes. Jitterbit Vinyl is noted for its extensive integration capabilities, powerful data transformation tools, and advanced features for complex integrations.

Room for Improvement: AgilePoint needs simpler customization options to cater to non-technical users. Jitterbit Vinyl requires more detailed documentation and broader training resources. Both products have areas for growth, but AgilePoint could improve user accessibility faster.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AgilePoint reviews indicate a straightforward deployment process with responsive customer support. Jitterbit Vinyl provides a relatively smooth deployment but requires more technical expertise. Customer service for Jitterbit Vinyl is efficient but noted less favorably than AgilePoint's.

Pricing and ROI: AgilePoint is known for its competitive pricing and quick ROI. Jitterbit Vinyl has a higher initial cost but offers substantial long-term value due to its superior functionalities. Users find AgilePoint provides better immediate cost benefits, while Jitterbit Vinyl delivers significant long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed AgilePoint vs. Jitterbit Vinyl Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AgilePoint vs. Jitterbit Vinyl

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AgilePoint

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

23rd

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

21st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (30th)

Jitterbit Vinyl

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

28th

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

25th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No-Code Development Platforms (16th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of AgilePoint is 0.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jitterbit Vinyl is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rapid Application Development Software

Featured Reviews

Ayush S

Automation Developer at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Provides efficient process management features, but it needs more integration capabilities

We use AgilePoint for an idea submission application for our business processes. It allows managers to review and update the approved idea on the dashboard AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management. We can integrate it with many applications including Microsoft, UiPath, and other…

Read full review

Larry Egan

VP Strategic Technologies at Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc

Can connect to any data source so we don't need to replicate data into a data warehouse to do reporting analytics

Having been a customer of theirs for a long time, I think the UI needed improvements early on. But, they have done a remarkable job catching up in that regard. They have always been great at connecting to a variety of data sources. They are a leader in that space. They do a great job, from a business analyst perspective, helping you shape what the ultimate system is going to look like. There really aren't a lot of areas that need improvement. The areas that they have, they are keenly aware of and have made great strides in recent releases.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management."

"The solution's workflows are its most useful feature."

"AgilePoint's automation is excellent in managing different user roles and handling data associated with a particular instance of the workflow."

"The initial setup of AgilePoint was very easy."

"I like the design and the integration capacity. It's also easy to use."

"AgilePoint has improved our organization by making form implementation easier and to plan for future growth."

"AgilePoint's automation is excellent in managing different user roles and handling data associated with a particular instance of the workflow."

"It's extremely easy to use in getting into the IDE and then back down to your applications, and getting from your applications to your pages, and navigating through all your tables. That's very simple and pretty intuitive."

"This is an extremely scalable solution because it enables us to interface with all types of disparate information."

"The ZPM system enables us to organize projects and monitor their progress. The ease of logging into the VINYL app to test new features makes testing smoother, and we feel more involved in the creation of the app and its functions at every step of the way."

"Maintenance is very minimal. With our live production applications, they just don't break, which is great. We love that. There's zero-to-little maintenance required."

"You can unite data which lives in different sources without moving that data."

"With the Lite Integration, I didn't to have to disrupt my entire organization to do something. We haven't had to disrupt IT and the business organizations to keep them up and running."

"VINYL works across different data sources. It is very useful to be able to map the data across different data sources and different environments. It is also very easy to develop small applications within a short span of time."

"The fact that it's no-code is one of the most important features because it allows us to deliver very quickly. We can get the value to the business delivered much more quickly than with other solutions."

More Jitterbit Vinyl pros

Cons

"While the platform is good and it has a lot of options, I would like to see more alternative features in future versions such as connectors to IDM. Currently, they have only ADFS and Okta."

"Integrations and customizations should be improved in AgilePoint and other low-code solutions."

"Some issues with AgilePoint's design, AI and UX are some of the major problems we deal with when handling our company's business models or processes."

"The solution should be able to support Docker. This would help make scalability easier."

"It could be more flexible, but it's already a good solution for the designer."

"They should add more information about functionality."

"I'd like to see the next release of VINYL have more user interface solutions to it, so that it could be a more user-friendly product on the front end for the customers that are utilizing the tool. We didn't have a solution to help automate all of our reporting in the past which identified the need to make sure that we could tap into our data sources and automate all of our reporting, which is exactly why we needed the tool."

"Some aspects of VINYL are limiting from a B2C standpoint. For example, it would be nice to have more flexibility with what the VINYL parameters allow us to develop within the app. It is difficult to think of an example off the top of my head, but there have been times when we couldn't develop something a particular way because VINYL didn't support it. However, the team Zudy assigned to us has been great about adjusting and finding ways around these hurdles."

"There are some acknowledged technical limitations. I was looking to do some metadata manipulation, which is very atypical. Zudy said that they will work on building me a workaround. If there is a weakness, that would be it."

"The calendar has room for improvement, but that's what they're going to be working on next, to make a Gantt chart."

"The ease of use for individuals to self-serve could be improved. The solution is no-code, but there is still a decent learning curve associated with the product and some app design principles necessary before people can self-serve."

"Perhaps the UI could be improved."

"I don't have a lot of negative things to say about the platform. One of the things we joke about, because it is very minor in detail, is that as with any platform, when you're hosting a live webinar on a GoToMeeting or a Zoom, everything slows down a little bit. So when you're doing a live demo internally with folks, the platform can go a step slower. That's not necessarily just a Zudy thing."

"There are a lot of almost "hidden" features captured in these Edge Case settings... If you want a scroll bar at the bottom, instead of having it select rows to show, you have to select Disable Panel Location Service, which doesn't sound at all like what it's supposed to do. Naming conventions could be changed a little bit."

More Jitterbit Vinyl cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think the price is reasonable."

"Price-wise, AgilePoint is a cheap tool and a standard application for running analytics in an IT environment."

"It is more cost-effective than local tools."

"I believe the pricing has changed recently. We had purchased one license per server, and it was about $2,000. It was a one-time payment. It's possible that they have recently implemented a new cost structure and now have yearly subscriptions."

"The licensing costs we pay are, I believe about 5,000 a month. That's every quarter. We've been doing it for about a year now, and the prices have remained steady. We feel it's a reasonable cost for what we're getting because it's unlimited users. So as big as you want to make it, you're not constrained by a per-user licensing cost or any of those other restrictions, so that's going to stifle your development."

"We haven't really had any issues with pricing. Like with any good partnership, you're paying a fair and good price for a good product. That's where great partnerships are developed, when one side doesn't feel like they won in a deal; when both sides feel like they won. That's where we are with Zudy VINYL."

"The value for us for VINYL is that we've got one fee that we're paying per year and we can deploy and build as many apps and bring in as many users as we need."

"I feel the product’s pricing is a good value. The licensing model is very straightforward. You license the platform and you can build however many solutions you want with it."

"Pricing is less than the cost of a consultant and the value you receive is much greater."

"The pricing and licensing of Zudy are fair."

"We have seen a 30 percent decrease in time for some of our workflows."

"We also pay for the managed services help that we get from them. But, to me, it is a very effective cost model. Licenses are relatively inexpensive, then you pay by the drink in terms of the managed services that you are going to need, which has been great. We figure out where we want to apply those services and try to be pretty diligent about managing the costs there."

More Jitterbit Vinyl pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

22%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

University

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Consumer Goods Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AgilePoint?

AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AgilePoint?

AgilePoint is worth the money, especially for small teams. However, I am not familiar with their enterprise pricing model.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AgilePoint?

There is room for improvement in integrations and customizations for AgilePoint and other low-code, no-code solutions. Additionally, the marketing of such products should be more honest. They often...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Power Apps vs AgilePoint

Compared 18% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs AgilePoint

Compared 18% of the time

Mendix vs AgilePoint

Compared 14% of the time

Camunda vs AgilePoint

Compared 14% of the time

OutSystems vs AgilePoint

Compared 13% of the time

More AgilePoint Competitors

Microsoft Power Apps vs Jitterbit Vinyl

Compared 100% of the time

More Jitterbit Vinyl Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

June 2025

Download AgilePoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Jitterbit Vinyl

June 2025

Download Jitterbit Vinyl product report

Overview

AgilePoint NX is a top-five low-code platform that empowers you to quickly build anything from simple eforms and workflows to complex, multi-tenant SaaS apps, IoT apps, and composite LOB systems without writing code and at a price almost any enterprise can afford.

AgilePoint

Jitterbit's Vinyl (previously Zudy) is an enterprise low-code application platform that makes it easy to build scalable, end-to-end apps that are easily integrated with new and existing systems. Designed for large enterprises to solve complex business problems at scale, Vinyl empowers anyone to create fully integrated, bi-directional applications in weeks. Powerful enough for Full Stack Developers, intuitive enough for Citizen Developers/Business Technologists, Vinyl empowers you to create secure apps that run on any device, automate any business process, and integrate any data source without coding.

Create fully integrated, bi-directional applications
Utilize guided development and visual rule builders
Predictable pricing with no per-user fees
Integrate the entire ecosystem without impacting source data
Protect apps with enterprise-grade security
Integrate real-time data
Deploy apps via enterprise cloud, on-premise or hosted
Improve customer digital experience

For more information: www.jitterbit.com/product/viny

Jitterbit

Sample Customers

Caja Laboral, Elbit Systems, Daisy Brand

Aetna, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc., Alvarez and Marsal, Audacy, Barstool Sports, Brooks Brothers, Cal-Maine Foods Inc., CNH Financial, Collette Travel, Darn Tough Vermont, DXL, Fresh Direct, iHeartMedia, Intra-Cellular Therapies, JBS Foods, J.Crew, Kraft Sports Group, MEMIC, New England Patriots, PGT Trucking Inc., United Healthcare, Worley

Buyer's Guide

AgilePoint vs. Jitterbit Vinyl

June 2025

Free Report: AgilePoint vs. Jitterbit Vinyl

Find out what your peers are saying about AgilePoint vs. Jitterbit Vinyl and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AgilePoint vs. Jitterbit Vinyl report.

See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.