AgilePoint vs Nintex Process Platform comparison

AgilePoint and Nintex are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. AgilePoint is ranked #22 with an average rating of 9.0, while Nintex is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0. AgilePoint holds a 0.8% mindshare in BPM, compared to Nintex’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of AgilePoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Nintex users who would recommend it.

AgilePoint

Read 6 AgilePoint reviews

865 Views
484 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

Read 24 Nintex Process Platform reviews

2,379 Views
1,784 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

AgilePoint

Nintex Process Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Nintex Process Platform and AgilePoint are competing in workflow automation. While AgilePoint seems to have the upper hand with its extensive features, its higher cost might be justified by these capabilities.

Features: Nintex Process Platform excels with its seamless integration capabilities, advanced workflow automation, and user-friendly design for rapid deployment. AgilePoint is notable for dynamic content management, extensive customization options, and support for multiple deployment environments.

Room for Improvement: Nintex could enhance mobile support, expand integration options, and improve scalability. AgilePoint may benefit from simplifying complex configurations, improving user interface simplicity, and enhancing initial deployment guidance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex offers a straightforward cloud-based deployment with responsive support teams for quick implementation. AgilePoint provides versatile deployment choices, including detailed assistance for hybrid and on-premises environments, but requires more technical support for complex configurations.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex is recognized for reasonable setup costs and strong ROI through efficient process automation. AgilePoint, while potentially more costly upfront, offers higher ROI for businesses needing extensive customization and adaptability.

To learn more, read our detailed AgilePoint vs. Nintex Process Platform Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AgilePoint vs. Nintex Process Platform

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,706 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AgilePoint

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

22nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (21st), Low-Code Development Platforms (20th)

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (9th), Workload Automation (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of AgilePoint is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 1.9%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Nintex Process Platform	1.9%
AgilePoint	0.8%
Other	97.3%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Ayush S

Automation Developer at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Provides efficient process management features, but it needs more integration capabilities

We use AgilePoint for an idea submission application for our business processes. It allows managers to review and update the approved idea on the dashboard AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management. We can integrate it with many applications including Microsoft, UiPath, and other…

Read full review

Satya Singh

Human Resource Executive at MetLife

Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability

Nintex is still at the starting point of integrating with AI. It has integrated with a very small piece of artificial intelligence., like only integrated with the Google Cloud. There is a benefit, like a no-code and low-code solution. But, again, if you are a developer, especially if you are a hardcore developer, you are using your code knowledge, its skills, and all. And, suddenly, you are moving into the low-code solution, and then you will feel, like, so many things you can't achieve with the low-code solution. And in that case, you are looking for some custom development. And it's a little bit difficult in the Nintex area. Because they are totally dependent on the low-code solution, and you are looking at where you can implement your custom things. However, you can do that thing, but that will be a difficult task. Also, the outcome, whatever you are trying to get from such kind of custom development, will be a little bit difficult. Let's suppose, like, if you are working with a medium level of data or a small level of data that will be easier to handle with the Nintex. However, the bulk data on a high level of data would be difficult. I have been working with Nintex for the past three years. I've been able to create some really good products in different domains, including banking and insurance. Everything seems achievable, but there are a few things I'm missing. First, debugging can be a bit difficult in Nintex. You can't debug forms and workflows easily. This is something that could be improved in future releases. It requires some R&D. Second, I would like to see more integration with AI. There is some custom integration available through the gateway, but it would be great to have more AI-related features built into the platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's workflows are its most useful feature."

"AgilePoint's automation is excellent in managing different user roles and handling data associated with a particular instance of the workflow."

"AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management."

"The initial setup of AgilePoint was very easy."

"AgilePoint's automation is excellent in managing different user roles and handling data associated with a particular instance of the workflow."

"I like the design and the integration capacity. It's also easy to use."

"AgilePoint has improved our organization by making form implementation easier and to plan for future growth."

"The solution offers very good integration capabilities. We've never had issues integrating it without solutions."

"This solution is very easy to use and customize, using almost zero coding. It's built on SharePoint which many companies in our country have experience with. This made it easy to adapt the application in our environment."

"The capacity to integrate with external platforms. It's great to be able to call web services or other external services."

"The Vizio-style designer that runs in the browser is, to me, by far the most valuable feature of the solution. It means that the customer doesn’t have to install any client tools to create powerful workflows."

"The integration capabilities have been very useful."

"The strength of this solution lies in its connectors and the accessibility of an open API. The presence of an open API allows users to create custom connectors if necessary, provided there is access to the source API documentation. Additionally, the platform features a straightforward yet highly effective forms tool. This tool not only seamlessly integrates with the workflow functionality but also facilitates the transmission of information to the document generation tool. This comprehensive integration is particularly noteworthy when compared to alternatives such as Oracle, which tends to rely on more complex and separate logic for similar functionalities. A key strength of Nintex lies in its user-centric approach to help documentation. The materials are designed to be easily understood, avoiding complex terminology. In cases where technical terms are used, they are linked to articles for further clarification. This contrasts with platforms like Microsoft and Oracle, which may employ technical jargon without clear explanations. Nintex further supports its users through a robust online community, fostering collaboration and shared insights. Additionally, Nintex University offers online training across all applications, following a role-based structure. Unlike some other platforms, Nintex's training is thoughtfully broken down into shorter courses, focused on specific roles. This approach ensures that users can efficiently access the information they need without navigating through extensive and potentially irrelevant content, as may be the case with Oracle's training structure."

"I think the initial setup is fine."

"K2 is reasonably priced."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

Cons

"They should add more information about functionality."

"It could be more flexible, but it's already a good solution for the designer."

"While the platform is good and it has a lot of options, I would like to see more alternative features in future versions such as connectors to IDM. Currently, they have only ADFS and Okta."

"Some issues with AgilePoint's design, AI and UX are some of the major problems we deal with when handling our company's business models or processes."

"Integrations and customizations should be improved in AgilePoint and other low-code solutions."

"The solution should be able to support Docker. This would help make scalability easier."

"Integrations and customizations should be improved in AgilePoint and other low-code solutions."

"Hawkeye is emerging as a reporting solution, but as a V1 product it’s not very useful yet."

"The user interface in Nintex needs improvement. It is not very intuitive and requires changes."

"At times, issues arise in certain scenarios. In such cases, the versioning can become quite difficult. There may be no other way but to restart the entire process or rectify it at that point."

"Currently, a notable challenge lies in the alignment of user experiences across the eight or nine applications within the suite. Transitioning between applications can be somewhat cumbersome due to varying user interfaces. However, the provider is actively addressing this concern by consistently rolling out updates every four to five months, aimed at harmonizing and streamlining the interfaces. This ongoing effort is expected to enhance the user experience over time. In terms of functionality and features, the platform stands out, offering flexibility with the option for both on-premises and cloud deployment. This flexibility extends to the RPA tool, providing clients with choices tailored to their preferences. An advantage lies in the shared security and data infrastructure across the toolset, facilitating smooth data transfer between applications. This contrasts with experiences with Oracle, where data transfer may involve complexities such as the need for intermediary file formats like TXL or SCZ."

"I would also like to see the BPM features from Pega implemented, that have to do with the implementation of AI, and the robotics."

"We cannot use the same solution on cloud."

"Built-in reporting on-prem is limited and clunky at best."

"The solution is a bit too expensive. It could be cheaper."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I believe the pricing has changed recently. We had purchased one license per server, and it was about $2,000. It was a one-time payment. It's possible that they have recently implemented a new cost structure and now have yearly subscriptions."

"I think the price is reasonable."

"Price-wise, AgilePoint is a cheap tool and a standard application for running analytics in an IT environment."

"It is more cost-effective than local tools."

"Comparatively, it's expensive."

"Nintex is around INR 200 per license in India, which is much cheaper. Smaller organizations are always looking for cost-effective solutions, and Nintex provides local solutions with very low pricing."

"It's more suited for enterprise level, not for small or medium-sized businesses (SMBs)."

"This solution is affordable and is cheaper than most alternatives on the market. We have a standard cloud license that costs about 20k per year."

"Offering a licensing model that allows for multiple small workflows would be a huge improvement to an already great platform."

"Certainly. Notably, in terms of cost, this solution presents a substantial advantage, being approximately forty percent more economical compared to Oracle. It offers flexibility with two deployment options, catering to both cloud and on-premises preferences. Moreover, within each deployment option, there are two variations available. For organizations with limited IT resources and relying on citizen developers—individuals from the business side comfortable with technology—the platform allows for a more hands-on approach. These users can independently implement solutions without extensive coding or custom development. In contrast, the KQ solution at Symantec is adept at addressing the needs of sectors like banking, where extensive custom development is required for seamless integration with existing applications, websites, and ensuring robust security measures."

"The enterprise version has some additional features that I would like to use, but the price is not fair."

"There is an initial fee when purchasing and a fee for maintenance afterward."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

University

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AgilePoint?

AgilePoint is worth the money, especially for small teams. However, I am not familiar with their enterprise pricing model.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AgilePoint?

There is room for improvement in integrations and customizations for AgilePoint and other low-code, no-code solutions. Additionally, the marketing of such products should be more honest. They often...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AgilePoint?

I use AgilePoint for business process automation. Traditionally, approvals and file movements within an organization would require physical documents. AgilePoint digitizes these processes by conver...

See all answers

What do you like most about K2?

The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

The user interface in Nintex needs improvement. It is not very intuitive and requires changes. Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs AgilePoint

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs AgilePoint

Compared 16% of the time

OutSystems vs AgilePoint

Compared 14% of the time

ServiceNow Now Platform vs AgilePoint

Compared 13% of the time

Appian vs AgilePoint

Compared 10% of the time

More AgilePoint Competitors

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 14% of the time

Pega Platform vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 8% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Ivanti Automation vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Flowable vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

October 2025

Download AgilePoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

October 2025

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

Overview

AgilePoint NX is a top-five low-code platform that empowers you to quickly build anything from simple eforms and workflows to complex, multi-tenant SaaS apps, IoT apps, and composite LOB systems without writing code and at a price almost any enterprise can afford.

AgilePoint

Nintex Process Platform offers no/low-code development with system integrations and efficient workflow management, ideal for complex business processes. It's known for its scalable workflows, data management through SmartObjects, and a user-friendly visual designer.

Nintex Process Platform enables organizations to automate processes with ease, supporting electronic forms, digital transformation, and seamless department collaboration. Users on SharePoint and other integrated systems leverage its extensive workflow capabilities for approvals, onboarding, and information capture. While its current framework might benefit from performance enhancements and improved management console usability, it remains a strong choice for providing scalable solutions across industries.

What are the key features of Nintex Process Platform?

No/Low-Code Development: Enables users to develop applications without extensive coding knowledge, simplifying process creation.
System Integration: Offers seamless integration with systems like SharePoint and SAP, enhancing operational efficiency.
Workflow Capability: Facilitates the creation of sophisticated workflows suitable for complex processes.
SmartObjects: Centralizes data management, ensuring streamlined data access and usability.
Visual Designer: Simplifies the design and execution of business processes with an intuitive interface.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Rapid deployment minimizes downtime and accelerates process automation.
Cost Savings: Reduces time spent on manual processes, improving operational costs.
Enhanced Collaboration: Streamlines communication and coordination across departments, leading to better teamwork.
Time Savings: Speeds up routine tasks like approvals and onboarding, freeing up resources for strategic initiatives.

Companies in sectors like government, HR, and financial services implement Nintex Process Platform for its ability to streamline and connect internal processes. It supports approval workflows, notifications, and data capturing, proving its versatility for diverse business needs. However, challenges with document conversion, performance, and cloud feature parity suggest room for enhancements, particularly in industries handling complex workflows.

Nintex

Sample Customers

Caja Laboral, Elbit Systems, Daisy Brand

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Buyer's Guide

AgilePoint vs. Nintex Process Platform

September 2025

Free Report: AgilePoint vs. Nintex Process Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about AgilePoint vs. Nintex Process Platform and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AgilePoint vs. Nintex Process Platform report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.