Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Agile Manager [EOL] vs OpenText AccuRev comparison

Agile Manager [EOL] and OpenText AccuRev are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. Additionally, 86% of Agile Manager [EOL] users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText AccuRev users who would recommend it.
Agile Manager [EOL]
Read 16 Agile Manager [EOL] reviews
    86% willing to recommend
    OpenText AccuRev
    Read 8 OpenText AccuRev reviews
    • 494 Views
    • 494 Comparison Views
    100% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive Summary
    We performed a comparison between Agile Manager [EOL] and OpenText AccuRev based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

    Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, OpenText and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: January 2026).
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
    January 2026
    Download the complete report
    Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Agile Manager [EOL]
    Average Rating
    7.6
    Number of Reviews
    16
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
    OpenText AccuRev
    Average Rating
    8.6
    Reviews Sentiment
    7.1
    Number of Reviews
    8
    Ranking in other categories
    Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (21st)
     

    Featured Reviews

    it_user739560 - PeerSpot reviewer
    it_user739560
    Senior manager IT at a transportation company
    Handles user stories well but the lack of a testing module is a problem
    Right now I can't say because other stuff is being migrated to Octane. But basically, the testing module that we are used to, that wasn't there at all. If they would have added that into it then they wouldn't even need to build Octane. We did have a list of items we wanted to see added but now they are moving all those things to Octane, and we are also interested in Octane now, so we are not looking to request any more changes to AGM, understanding that this is the go-to tool.
    Read full review
    Sameh-Hablas - PeerSpot reviewer
    Sameh-Hablas
    CEO - Director General & Founder Ai/ IT Expert - Digital Transformation at Al Danah Information Systems Solutions
    Helps us with our compliance goals, native quality management systems and with the legacy systems in our organization
    To improve the product, it needs some enhancement to the application's interface to be more user-friendly. The product has all the features that we need and we can depend upon it. My issue with the product is that it is not easy to use without a guide or a proper manual. That is my point. It is not very friendly to use. For example, we may need the application to be more friendly in other sorts of ways. If we have an integrated module that allows access to the features we want through one click, you do not need to make it two or three clicks on the screen. The interface can be better designed to easily provide access to the features you need. The feature I would like to see in the next release is just for it to be more friendly to use and to be like a smart application that intuits your movement through the application. It needs to be something that works smoothly and intelligent without any complicated navigation of screens.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "How you write your user stories, and the requirements gathering, in Agile Manager is pretty good."
    "The most valuable feature of the solution is taking snapshots while doing the execution of the test cases."
    "The product has all the features that we for application managementat a lower cost."
    "The most valuable feature is the Business Process Testing feature, BPT, because it brings in the most revenue."
    "The solution is 100% scalable. It's much more scalable than the customer's capacity for implementing it. We do plan to increase usage ourselves."
     

    Cons

    "The testing module that we are used to, that wasn't there at all."
    "The pricing should be more competitive."
    "In the next release, I would like to have a repository for the code which is embedded. Apart from that, it has everything I need."
    "What I'm missing from the solution is a repository for the code. Something like Git, for example. Some sort of depository for the code that is embedded."
    "It is difficult to gain experience with the product because resources and documentation for learning are not available."
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    Information not available
    "It is a lower cost than other top competetors."
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Midsize Enterprise3
    Large Enterprise12
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business5
    Midsize Enterprise1
    Large Enterprise2
     

    Comparisons

    No data available
    GoCD vs OpenText AccuRev Logo
    GoCD vs OpenText AccuRev
    Compared 38% of the time
    TFS vs OpenText AccuRev Logo
    TFS vs OpenText AccuRev
    Compared 33% of the time
    Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText AccuRev Logo
    Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText AccuRev
    Compared 30% of the time
    More OpenText AccuRev Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Agile Manager [EOL]
    February 2026
    Agile Manager [EOL] reportDownload Agile Manager [EOL] product report
    Buyer's Guide
    OpenText AccuRev
    January 2026
    OpenText AccuRev reportDownload OpenText AccuRev product report
     

    Also Known As

    Micro Focus Agile Manager, HPE Agile Manager
    Micro Focus AccuRev, AccuRev
     

    Overview

    Agile project management solution to plan, execute and track Agile projects. Agile teams can improve Release Planning, Sprint Planning, Sprint Execution, and gain more Visibility and Insight into Agile projects using SaaS or on-premise deployment.

    Key Features include: Release and User Story and Defect Management, Development Tools Integration, Team/Resource Management, Rest APIs, Micro Focus ALM/QC/PPM Synchronizer, Regular releases driven by user feedback, Modern, clean, intuitive UI and SAFeTM Gold Certified.

    OpenText

    Get the governance and compliance capabilities you need to manage complexity. OpenText AccuRev helps you implement modern development practices at enterprise scale.

    OpenText
     

    Sample Customers

    Trizetto, Discount Tire and Siemens
    Akcelerant, SDL, CSG, Avid Technology Inc., Azimuth Systems Inc, Drivecam, Endgame, f5 Networks, Follett Software, Hyland Software, Indanet, Kronos, McAfee
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
    January 2026
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, OpenText and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: January 2026.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

    We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.