Adobe Workfront vs CoreMedia comparison

Read 1 CoreMedia review

323 Views
42 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Adobe Workfront

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Adobe Workfront and CoreMedia based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Adobe, Cloudinary, Box and others in Digital Asset Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Digital Asset Management Report (Updated: July 2025).

Digital Asset Management

Download the complete report

Helped 864,053 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Workfront

Ranking in Digital Asset Management

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Management Software (9th)

CoreMedia

Ranking in Digital Asset Management

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Content Management (8th), Digital Experience Platforms (DXP) (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Digital Asset Management category, the mindshare of Adobe Workfront is 13.4%, down from 17.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CoreMedia is 2.2%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Digital Asset Management

Featured Reviews

Graham Sprague

Sr. Manager/Adobe Workfront Fusion Developer at Staples, Inc.

Centralized task management and simplified creative collaboration but interface is inconsistent

Adobe Workfront could improve its interface, which may benefit from an overhaul for better consistency between the web interface and the API. The current setup was not originally designed API-first, leading to some confusion and differences in available functions. Additionally, the low-code environment in Workfront Fusion is beneficial yet sometimes limiting, and it might be more powerful with enhancements.

Read full review

Vinceno Barone

CDO at Intellidio

Provides effective workflow management and catalog management

Around three to four engineers are needed for the solution's deployment and maintenance. The solution's e-commerce integration feature has impacted our marketing efforts and catalog management. CoreMedia is stable and strong in terms of editorial things. The solution has helped our organization manage translations for different languages. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I also like Workfront's integration. The solution integrates natively with other systems. It's easy to connect Workfront to any product that has a customer service database, such as a CRM or service ticket management solution."

"The solution is stable."

"Monitoring the progress of projects and tasks is very effective."

"The intake feature is the most valuable in Workfront."

"Adobe Workfront has been stable in my experience, and I would rate its stability as an eight out of ten."

"The tool is very user-friendly."

"Feature-wise, I would say that its overall ability to be infinitely customizable is valuable...My experience with the support team has been amazing."

"I can say it is a powerful tool. We have everything in-house in that tool, like, creating reports, dashboards, creating various workflows, and everything we have inside one application."

More Adobe Workfront pros

"CoreMedia is good for workflow management and user reviews."

Cons

"Adobe Workfront could improve its interface, which may benefit from an overhaul for better consistency between the web interface and the API."

"Sometimes, new users find it a bit difficult to handle Adobe Workfront."

"Workfront's reporting capabilities must be improved."

"Integration with Azure DevOps could be improved to facilitate better communication between the two systems."

"Sometimes there are glitches when we are reviewing an interactive proof."

"Our product and graphic designers are working with various Adobe products, but Workfront has a no-frills interface. It's a useful tool with everything we need, but it could be a little more attractive and present information in a polished way. It's a web interface, so it's accessible, but the appearance could be a little slicker."

"We were having some difficulties creating different kinds of reports and dashboards."

"I have used the product and instantiated it, almost seven years back. The process was fairly complex, however, I don't know if they have changed the same now. But this is something I think, if not addressed can be improved. Another area that needs a little attention, is the change of implementation lead. Back when we had Workfront instantiated, we often had our timeline delayed due to the change in the implementation lead. Now Workfront is under Adobe and, in case, this issue, isn't fixed it should be given due attention. Also, Workfront is a universal tool, which can pose a difficulty for small businesses and companies, who don't have the required time, effort, and knowledge to configure it periodically."

More Adobe Workfront cons

"It is difficult to scale the solution with respect to the costs and infrastructure."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Adobe Workfront is an expensive solution."

"The pricing is a barrier to implementation. It is expensive compared to other competitors. Speaking about licensing, they have a private manager license for $1000, which you can use for administration as well. Then they offer a worker license for $500, and then a reviewer or contributor license which is free."

"Adobe purchased Workfront in the past year, and they're putting work into developing the platform, so I expect the price to rise. It isn't cheap, but it's reasonable for the value it provides. It isn't Monday.com where you pick a license with a set price, and you've got a project manager."

"The pricing of Workfront is completely license based."

"We are partners with Adobe, so we get the licensing at a cheaper rate."

"Speaking about pricing, I wouldn't recommend it to a smaller company because I do think the price point is higher than other solutions that can work."

"Our customers pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Digital Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Workfront?

Workfront incurs around a hundred thousand plus dollars per year. Licensing is strict, particularly with free accounts, however, it offers flexibility in project access, which could be enhanced fur...

What needs improvement with Workfront?

Integration with Azure DevOps could be improved to facilitate better communication between the two systems. The current report is not providing the expected side-by-side comparison of capabilities,...

What is your primary use case for Workfront?

For my team, we are using Adobe Workfront ( /products/adobe-workfront-reviews ) right now to support demand management, primarily. We also pull some high-level reports on status. From our perspecti...

What do you like most about CoreMedia?

CoreMedia is good for workflow management and user reviews.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CoreMedia?

Our customers pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution.

What needs improvement with CoreMedia?

It is difficult to scale the solution with respect to the costs and infrastructure. The solution's integration and multimedia could be improved.

Aprimo vs Adobe Workfront

Comparisons

Compared 17% of the time

Wrike vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 15% of the time

Asana vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 15% of the time

Smartsheet vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 14% of the time

Jira vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 13% of the time

More Adobe Workfront Competitors

Magnolia CMS vs CoreMedia

Compared 100% of the time

More CoreMedia Competitors

Product Reports

Adobe Workfront

Download Adobe Workfront product report

Web Content Management

Download CoreMedia product report

Also Known As

AtTask, Workfront DAM

No data available

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Adobe

Overview

AtTask is a cloud-based Enterprise Work Management solution that helps marketing, IT, and other enterprise teams conquer the chaos of excessive email, redundant status meetings, and disconnected tools. Unlike other tools, AtTask Enterprise Work Cloud is a centralized, easy-to-adopt solution for managing and collaborating on all types of work through the entire work lifecycle, which improves team productivity and executive visibility. AtTask is trusted by thousands of global enterprises, like Adobe, Cisco, HBO, House of Blues, REI, Trek, Schneider Electric, and ATB Financial. To learn more, visit www.AtTask.com or follow us on Twitter @AtTask.

Adobe

CoreMedia is a composable Digital Experience Platform designed for enterprises to deliver personalized omnichannel customer experiences across websites, mobile apps, and messaging platforms.

CoreMedia leverages a hybrid headless CMS to integrate content, real-time data, and AI capabilities. This setup enhances personalization, marketing, and global delivery while supporting regional localization. It merges AI with human interactions, empowering businesses with relevant information and real-time support through the customer journey. CoreMedia also automates repetitive tasks, streamlining content operations and adjusting experiences in real time. Compatible with existing tech stacks, it offers flexible deployment options, including on-premise, private or public cloud, and SaaS.

What are the most important features of CoreMedia?

Composable DXP: Enables personalized customer experiences across multiple platforms.
Hybrid Headless CMS: Integrates content and AI for dynamic personalization.
Omnichannel Support: Ensures consistent experiences across web, mobile, and messaging.
AI-Driven Tools: Automates content operations and supports real-time interaction.
Flexible Deployment: Supports on-premise, cloud, and SaaS environments.

What key benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Automates and streamlines content and marketing tasks.
Versatility: Integrates with current technology infrastructures.
Scalability: Adapts to growth and changes in business demands.
Localization: Facilitates global reach with regional customization.

In retail, CoreMedia enhances customer engagement with personalized marketing strategies. Healthcare providers utilize its robust data integration for patient-centric communications. In the media industry, it enables agile content creation and distribution to keep audiences engaged. CoreMedia’s adaptability makes it a valuable choice for industries requiring customized, efficient digital experiences.

Sample Customers

Advance Autoparts, Emerson, Covario, Cisco, Caroma, TREK, Sapient Nitro, ATB, LexisNexis, CarPhone Warehouse

Henkel, Deutsche Telekom and MASORANGE, Hoka, Ugg, Finnair, MaxMara, Emerson, The North Face, DMG Mori, Vans

Digital Asset Management