

Acunetix and Klocwork are tools competing in vulnerability management and static code analysis. Klocwork often takes the lead with its advanced features, offering significant value for its price.
Features: Acunetix offers comprehensive vulnerability detection, effective for a broad range of security threats, and benefits from affordability and reliable customer support. Klocwork provides a robust feature set with extensive coding standard support and early runtime error detection, which is advantageous for complex codebases.
Room for Improvement: Acunetix needs faster scanning and enhanced CI/CD integration. Klocwork could benefit from streamlining its update process, improving large project handling, and expanding language support. Both tools have areas needing specific enhancements.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix is noted for its rapid deployment with minimal setup complexity and dependable customer service. Klocwork requires more setup time and technical expertise but offers efficient and responsive customer support, helping offset deployment challenges.
Pricing and ROI: Acunetix is recognized for competitive pricing and delivers strong ROI, especially for small to mid-sized enterprises. Klocwork, although more expensive, yields a high ROI due to its powerful feature set, making it worth the expense for larger development teams.
It saves a significant amount of time by covering attack surfaces.
I have seen a return on investment, as Acunetix helps reduce the man-days and effort needed for scanning bulk applications through automated assessments.
I have seen a return on investment with Acunetix, including time saved and cost reduction, because it provides us threats on our web application servers.
The main ROI factors include efficiency and how we meet compliance standards for various automotive requirements.
For high-severity issues, they reach out within two to three hours, and for critical issues, a response is received within 15 minutes.
The technical support from Invicti is very good and fast.
Support staff not being familiar with the problem.
The customer support team is very responsive, proactive, and engages in conversations to ensure our needs are met.
The issue is not about the knowledge of the support but about the prioritization of the tickets they handle.
During the initial phase, there was a need for follow-ups and clarifications.
Acunetix can handle increasing workloads and more applications easily.
Acunetix's scalability for my growing needs is great; it is a very scalable product compared to others.
Klocwork supports our scalability needs without issues, even as project volumes increase.
The program-to-program enablement is scalable.
I did not need to reach customer support because the product is very stable.
Installation is easy, and the solution is stable.
The main concern is related to false positives; Acunetix needs to work on identifying valid and invalid findings.
Acunetix should have better integration with newer tools such as GitHub and Azure DevOps.
I believe Acunetix can improve customer support, as the dedicated support staff are often unfamiliar with problems and troubleshooting, leading to communication gaps that delay issue resolution.
There are too many warnings, and it requires expertise to determine the correct category for them.
Klocwork sometimes provides too many additional warnings which require expertise to manage.
We would like Klocwork to connect to Git and notify developers of issues tied to specific commits.
The pricing cost is affordable for small and mid-sized organizations, and when compared to Checkmarx, it is significantly affordable, as Checkmarx is quite expensive.
We secured a special licensing model for penetration testing companies, which is cost-effective.
The pricing of Acunetix is pretty expensive and could be improved.
It is less expensive than Coverity.
The solution is not very cheap, however, it is less expensive than Coverity.
Klocwork was competitively priced, making it a cost-effective solution for us.
Its most valuable role is in enhancing security by identifying potential vulnerabilities efficiently.
The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.
The best feature Acunetix offers is the centralized dashboard and the quality of reports it generates, which includes various options for selecting reports and developer options for directly sharing the reports with developers.
The most valuable feature of Klocwork is the static analysis tools, which help identify potential security threats and errors.
Its integration with the CI/CD pipeline has helped streamline the software development process.
It takes just half a day to set up.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Acunetix | 2.3% |
| Klocwork | 1.4% |
| Other | 96.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.
Klocwork detects security, safety, and reliability issues in real-time by using this static code analysis toolkit that works alongside developers, finding issues as early as possible, and integrates with teams, supporting continuous integration and actionable reporting.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.