ActiveBatch by Redwood vs CA Process Automation comparison

ActiveBatch by Redwood and Broadcom are both solutions in the Process Automation category. ActiveBatch by Redwood is ranked #17 with an average rating of 9.0, while Broadcom is ranked #36. ActiveBatch by Redwood holds a 0.9% mindshare in PA, compared to Broadcom’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ActiveBatch by Redwood users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Read 36 ActiveBatch by Redwood reviews

2,024 Views
526 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CA Process Automation

Read 12 CA Process Automation reviews

382 Views
382 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ActiveBatch by Redwood

CA Process Automation

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

CA Process Automation and ActiveBatch by Redwood are competitors in the automation software market. While CA Process Automation is favored for its affordability and strong support, ActiveBatch is preferred for its comprehensive feature set justifying its higher cost.

Features: CA Process Automation offers robust workflow automation, seamless third-party integrations, and user-friendliness. ActiveBatch provides sophisticated job scheduling, extensive customization, and enterprise-focused capabilities.

Room for Improvement: CA Process Automation could enhance its scalability, expand its feature set, and improve user accessibility for non-technical users. ActiveBatch may benefit from a simplified deployment process, enhanced usability for new users, and reduced configuration complexity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Process Automation is known for its easy deployment and accessible customer support, appealing to small businesses. ActiveBatch, though complex, provides dedicated support and comprehensive documentation, ideal for large enterprises.

Pricing and ROI: CA Process Automation offers cost-effective pricing with quick return on investment. ActiveBatch requires a higher initial investment but delivers substantial ROI through its advanced automation features.

To learn more, read our detailed ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. CA Process Automation Report (Updated: November 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. CA Process Automation

November 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,869 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Ranking in Process Automation

17th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed File Transfer (MFT) (14th), Workload Automation (13th)

CA Process Automation

Ranking in Process Automation

36th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of ActiveBatch by Redwood is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CA Process Automation is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ActiveBatch by Redwood	0.9%
CA Process Automation	0.5%
Other	98.6%

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Shubham Bharti

Associate Consultant at Capgemini

Flexible, easy to use, and offers good automation

Occasionally, I find myself contemplating if there is room for improvement in the user interface (UI), and envisioning that with certain enhancements. The UI could potentially offer a more refined and user-friendly experience, fostering smoother interactions and facilitating easier navigation for users engaging with the application. New users might encounter a minor setback due to the absence of readily accessible training videos, which could have otherwise proven to be an invaluable resource in aiding their initial familiarization with the platform, potentially hindering their seamless onboarding process and delaying their ability to harness the software's full range of capabilities to its utmost potential.

Read full review

Sandeep Jha

Automation Solutions Developer at HCL Technologies

Added value to the delivery of services and the customer experience

We design end-to-end automation solutions for repetitive tasks performed by IT support teams This tool is used in my organization for automating IT infrastructure related incidents or service requests. Built-in operators available for most integrations. Easy to manage. Attended/unattended…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"ActiveBatch's Self-Service Portal allows our business units to run and monitor their own workloads. They can simply run and review the logs, but they can't modify them. It increases their productivity because they are able to take care of things on their own. It saves us time from having to rerun the scripts, because the business units can just go ahead and log in and and rerun it themselves."

"Since I started using this product, I have been able to easily track everything as it mainly monitors, alerts, and looks after all the services - even across platform scheduling - which has helped me immensely."

"ActiveBatch by Redwood has positively impacted my organization by efficiently managing a significant volume of data and workflow between our database and applications on the web browser."

"It has helped with scheduling complex jobs with simple scripts."

"The nice thing about ActiveBatch is once we have created a specific job that can be easily be replicated to another job, then minimal changes will have to be made. This makes things nice. Reduction of coding is substantial in a lot of cases. The replication of one job to another is just doing a few minor tweaks and rolling it into production. This decreases our development costs substantially."

"ActiveBatch by Redwood has positively impacted my organization by efficiently managing a significant volume of data and workflow between our database and applications on the web browser."

"The product offers a centralized platform for managing activities across many environments, applications, etc."

"ActiveBatch can automate predictable, repeatable processes very well. There is no real trick to what ActiveBatch does. ActiveBatch does exactly what you would expect a scheduling piece of software to do. It does it in a timely manner and does it with very little outside interference and fanfare. It runs when it is supposed to, and I don't have to jump through a bunch of hoops to double check it."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood pros

"It is easy to debug and troubleshoot."

"This tool is used in my organization for automating IT infrastructure related incidents or service requests."

Cons

"Some of the advanced features in the user interface are a bit confusing even after referring to the documents."

"A cloud option is not provided as a free feature, making it a costly solution for smaller organizations."

"As more organizations are moving towards a cloud-based infrastructure, ActiveBatch could incorporate more capabilities that support popular cloud platforms, such as AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud."

"The reporting needs improvement. There is a real need for the ability to generate audit reports on the fly. It needs to be a lot easier than what I can do right now. This is a major item for me."

"We currently face issues with the web console of ActiveBatch by Redwood. When users operate through an RDP session, every user has their own ActiveBatch by Redwood application. However, on the web console, users encounter daily activity issues where the job instances do not appear or update correctly, and they cannot view the latest logs."

"Any product is going to have some room for improvement, no matter what. I see the company has already ventured into AWS and they're constantly trying to improve the managed file transfer which they have recently improvised. I think they bought a software called JSCAPE and they're trying to improve it, which is good. I am not sure if JSCAPE would be part of the base product but currently, you have to buy a separate license for it, which doesn't make sense. If it was Microsoft, ServiceNow, or integrating with other software vendors, I would understand but JSCAPE is now in-house and I'm not sure if they can justify having a separate license for JSCAPE. I would probably expect them to be packaging JSCAPE into the base product. They did switch over from a perpetual license model to a subscription model, which hurt the company a little bit. Nobody is offering the perpetual model anymore. As long as the transition is fair for both the companies, I think it should be fine and not burn us out."

"The user interface can be improved so that it is more appealing and accessible to new users."

"They have some crucial design flaws within the console that still need to be worked out because it is not working exactly how we hoped to see it, e.g., just some minor things where when you hit the save button, then all of a sudden all your job's library items collapse. Then, in order to continue on with your testing, you have to open those back up. I have taken that to them, and they are like, "Yep. We know about it. We know we have some enhancements that need to be taken care of. We have more developers now." They are working towards taking the minor things that annoy us, resolving them, and getting them fixed."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood cons

"It needs auto-triggering of workflows based on machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI)."

"OCR capability should be added as a feature."

"Somehow the product group within CA left the product dry from some regular expression functionality."

"Make some of the features more open source that way developers can have more flexibility."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If you compare ActiveBatch licensing to Control-M, you're looking at $50,000 as opposed to millions."

"It allows for lower operational overhead."

"Currently, we are paying approximately $7,000 yearly, which includes support."

"The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking."

"The pricing was fair. There are additional costs for the plugins. We have the standard licensing fees for different pieces, then we have the plugins which were add-ons. However, we expected that."

"ActiveBatch is currently redesigning themselves. In the past, they were a low cost solution for automation. They had a nice tool that was very inexpensive. With their five-year plan, they will be more enhancement-driven, so they're trying to improve their software, customer service, and the way that their customers get information from them. In doing that, they're raising the price of their base system. They changed from one pricing model to another, which has caused some friction between ActiveBatch and us. We're working through that right now with them. That's one of the reasons why we're why we were evaluating other software packages."

"I like ActiveBatch Workload Automation's licensing model because they're not holding you down on an agentless model or agent model, where every server needs to have an agent. That's the main selling point of the solution and I hope they stay that way."

"I don't think we've ever had a problem with the pricing or licensing. Even the maintenance fees are very much in line. They are not excessive. I think for the support that you get, you get a good value for your money. It's the best value on the market."

"It has provided ROI by auto resolving incidents or requests in the ITSM queue, improved MTTR and SLA adherence, and added value to the delivery of services and the customer experience."

"There are a lot of automation savings from any process which is repeatable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,869 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	47

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Large Enterprise	10

Comparisons

Control-M vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 16% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 13% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 9% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 8% of the time

Automic Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 8% of the time

More ActiveBatch by Redwood Competitors

Microsoft System Center Orchestrator vs CA Process Automation

Compared 100% of the time

More CA Process Automation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood

November 2025

Download ActiveBatch by Redwood product report

Buyer's Guide

CA Process Automation

November 2025

Download CA Process Automation product report

Also Known As

ActiveBatch

CA IT Process Automation Manager

Overview

ActiveBatch by Redwood enhances efficiency with features like job scheduling, integration, and real-time monitoring. It supports diverse platforms, automates tasks, and offers a single-pane view with robust security.

ActiveBatch streamlines automation by offering drag-and-drop functionality, pre-built job steps, and native integrations. Its customizable workflows and alert system aid in managing complex workloads like data processing and server monitoring across hybrid environments. While it effectively reduces manual errors and enhances productivity, areas like navigation and support for cloud platforms need enhancement. New users may face challenges due to its complexity and steep learning curve, and further improvements in reporting, mobile access, and training could provide additional support to users.

What important features does ActiveBatch offer?

Comprehensive Job Scheduling: Manages and automates complex workloads efficiently.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly connects with different platforms and applications.
Real-time Monitoring: Offers a single-pane view for quick issue identification.
Customizable Workflows: Tailors processes to specific organizational tasks.
Robust Alert System: Ensures timely notifications for critical events.
Data Protection: Incorporates strong security measures for secure operations.

What benefits should be considered when evaluating ActiveBatch?

Enhanced Efficiency: Automates repetitive tasks, reducing manual intervention.
Improved Productivity: Streamlines processes across hybrid environments.
Error Reduction: Decreases likelihood of manual errors.
Platform Support: Provides integration with diverse systems.

In finance, ActiveBatch is implemented for orchestrating batch processes and data management. The healthcare industry utilizes it for automating patient data updates and server monitoring, while the retail sector benefits from file transfers and inventory management automation.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

CA Process Automation is designed to speed the delivery of IT services while helping to remove manual errors. By defining, automating and orchestrating processes across organizational silos that use disparate systems, CA Process Automation helps improve productivity while also enforcing standards. With CA Process Automation, you can automate IT processes that span multiple organizations and systems, reduce the time it takes to deliver services and enforce standards and compliance policies across departments. CA Process Automation helps you automate IT processes to reduce operational expenses, increase staff productivity, speed IT service delivery, improve service quality, and enforce compliance policies.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Informatica, D&H, ACES, PrimeSource, Sub-Zero Group, SThree, Lamar Advertising, Subway, Xcel Energy, Ignite Technologies, Whataburger, Jyske Bank, Omaha Children's Hospital

Unum, HCL Technologies, Logicalis

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. CA Process Automation

November 2025

Free Report: ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. CA Process Automation

Find out what your peers are saying about ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. CA Process Automation and other solutions. Updated: November 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,869 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. CA Process Automation report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.