Actifio vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

Google and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Google is ranked #47 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.0. Google holds a 0.4% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Actifio

Read 8 Actifio reviews

813 Views
618 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

1,596 Views
1,325 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Actifio

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

OpenText Data Protector and Actifio compete in the data protection solutions category. Actifio appears to have the upper hand due to its feature-rich offerings and responsive customer service.

Features:OpenText Data Protector offers effective backup and restore capabilities, robust data encryption, and reliable performance. Actifio provides easy data replication, comprehensive data management features, and high scalability, giving it an edge over OpenText.

Room for Improvement:OpenText users request faster backups, a more intuitive setup process, and enhanced cloud support. Actifio users suggest better reporting functionalities, support for more cloud platforms, and improved user interface consistency. Actifio's areas of improvement are more focused, making it a more cohesive solution.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:OpenText is noted for straightforward deployment but has mixed reviews on customer service. Actifio is praised for its detailed deployment support and highly responsive customer service. Actifio’s superior customer service and supported deployment process give it a significant advantage.

Pricing and ROI:OpenText is cost-effective with good ROI due to lower setup costs. Actifio offers a higher ROI despite its higher initial costs due to its extensive features and reliable performance. Actifio’s higher investment is justified by its returns, setting it apart from OpenText.

To learn more, read our detailed Actifio vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Actifio vs. OpenText Data Protector

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,484 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Actifio

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

47th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Data Management (8th)

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

21st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Actifio is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Hitesh Kumar Jamb

Devsecops & Test Automation Practice Lead at APA Group

Helps reduce costs and enables the creation of new non-production databases

We use the solution on our non-production database. We use it to spin up non-production environments using Oracle The product helps to create new non-production databases. The solution helps reduce costs. The product must provide AI features. Google has stopped supporting the on-premise version…

Read full review

Jeroen Vranckaerts

System Engineer - Server & Storage, DBA at Audi Brussels

Though a highly stable tool, it needs to be made easier to use and configure

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a five out of ten. OpenText Data Protector is complex to configure correctly, but the areas concerning the data and compression are good. Once you get the product to work, it works, but it's much too complex to configure and troubleshoot, as it takes a lot of time and energy, making it not so efficient. Once the tool is configured in your environment, it provides good backup and compression features. In my company, we use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our servers, and we have a team of 20 people to take care of the data backup using the tool. My company doesn't use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our client's computers. In my company, we have scheduled the process related to backup, which makes the tool run daily around 30 to 40 times.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"They will assist me in achieving whatever budget issue the client may be having."

"Actifio was very stable. Whenever they identified bugs, they would promptly provide us with patches."

"Very user-friendly and the QSA is very good."

"This product has unique capabilities that lead the product category in test data management, cloning and recovery."

"The solution helps reduce costs."

"Very user-friendly and the QSA is very good."

"What I like the most about this solution is that I can change and access the Oracle backup file."

"The initial setup is straightforward if you understand Data Protector."

"Data Protector's GUI is the most useful feature."

"Deduplication implementation with CAPA is very good."

"Ability to automatically detect and secure new data sources without requiring manual configuration intervention."

"I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"Data Protector is very good at automation. From the time of the backup, verification, and copy to tape, it is very good. I don't need to touch it, it will do it by itself."

"Data Protector is quite simple and easy to deploy. The deployment is always the same. It's on a server, and the agents are deployed to the machines in a straightforward way. We have two engineers who deploy and manage all our backup solutions."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"While the product does support various databases, the company needs to make more of an effort to support N-minus-one compatibility."

"The solution doesn't support AIX software or in-cloud, and we have a lot of servers running on AIX and Oracle."

"Areas that need improvement would be the support for recovery in the physical environment."

"The initial setup is complex."

"Lacks the option to price backup costs within the solution itself."

"Google has stopped supporting the on-premise version of the tool."

"We have so many specific technological cracks in Micro Focus, but we are not getting the features, facilities, or coordination between the global delivery centers and the R&D team that we need to express our ideas."

"The GUI could be updated. The GUI hasn't changed since version 6. It's on version 10 now. The reporting could also be better. Also, while Data Protector is excellent for backing up physical hardware, it needs more features for backing up VM images because many environments use hypervisor."

"The new backup systems are using new mechanisms for the recovery phases; for example, VM, recovery and testing the backup before recovering it. These features are not available in Data Protector."

"It would be ideal if they could improve their level of support."

"The downside of the flexibility on offer is if you over-configure it, it may fail to function as some configurations may not match."

"We faced some certification issues after we upgraded to version 10.2."

"It's very expensive compared to Veeam and other similar solutions."

"It has a lot of undeveloped functions like window searching and patent searching, and within the main backup processes like VMware and Microsoft Exchange. It's completely not user-friendly, and it has no built-in antivirus software. In my opinion, Micro Focus Data Protector is not an enterprise level solution."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Support is very good. They send out a VM link and help you fix any issues."

"Pricing is on a case by case basis."

"Actifio is cheaper than other tools."

"The pricing is around $3,000 to $5,000. The charge additionally for support and to scale."

"Our licensing is on a capacity basis."

"Pricing/licensing is Data Protector's single best offering. In its most basic environment, the only license required is for whatever target device is required."

"We have many competitors who are pricing better, and we believe that our pricing is higher."

"The solution requires paying for a license."

"The product is cheaper than Commvault."

"The pricing is acceptable for enterprise level companies, but it's not acceptable for small- and medium-sized businesses. Micro Focus Data Protector is not an enterprise level solution, and it should cover small- and medium-sized businesses with acceptable prices."

"The license for the solution is very expensive compared to the other products in the market."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Retailer

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Actifio?

The solution helps reduce costs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Actifio?

Actifio is cheaper than other tools. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Actifio?

The product must provide AI features. Google has stopped supporting the on-premise version of the tool.

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus Data Protector?

I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

Comparisons

Rubrik vs Actifio

Compared 42% of the time

Perforce Delphix vs Actifio

Compared 31% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Actifio

Compared 27% of the time

More Actifio Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 49% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 11% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 11% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 7% of the time

Dell Avamar vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Actifio

August 2025

Download Actifio product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

August 2025

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Overview

Actifio is the world’s leading Enterprise Data-as-a-Service (EDaaS) platform. It enables thousands of users around the world to deliver their data just as they deliver their applications and infrastructure… as a service available instantly, anywhere. An enterprise-class software platform powered by patented Virtual Data Pipeline™ technology, Actifio frees data from traditional infrastructure to accelerate adoption of hybrid cloud, build higher quality applications faster, and improve business resiliency and availability. For more, visit Actifio.com or follow us on Twitter @Actifio.

Google

OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.

OpenText

Sample Customers

IBM, Waste Industries, Nasdaq, Verizon, Sharp, Rosetta Stone, Dakine, JBS Australia, Texas Wesleyan University, Cintra, People's Choice Credit Union, Lotto NZ, Electric Insurance, Tyler Technologies, Intility, Corporate One Federal Credit Union, Bryant University, pc/nametag, Isagenix, Sungard Availability Services, Databank, Electrocraft, Lifescript, Westfleisch, Interstate National Corporation, RestorePoint, Net3, Access Community Health Network, Newmarket International, Rezolve Group Inc., Piri Reis University, MC Assembly, Grass-Merkur, dbMotion, Christian Broadcasting Network, Bezeq, Abilene Christian University, CNW Group, Softcat, Migliori, City of South Portland, NaviSite, News-Press & Gazette, Comtec, Equity Insurance, Admirals Bank, Assistra, Dassault, Henry Davis York Lawyers, SAI Global, Audax Group, DSM, Triad Retail Media, Euronet Worldwide, Palm Beach County School District, iGate, Emerald Queen Casino

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Buyer's Guide

Actifio vs. OpenText Data Protector

July 2025

Free Report: Actifio vs. OpenText Data Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about Actifio vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Actifio vs. OpenText Data Protector report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.