Acronis Cyber Protect vs Nasuni comparison

Acronis Cyber Protect and Nasuni are competitors in the data protection and storage management space. Acronis Cyber Protect holds the advantage with its extensive backup options and platform support, while Nasuni is strong in scalable file storage and disaster recovery.

Features: Acronis Cyber Protect offers incremental, full, and differential backups, universal restore, and data sync features. It supports Windows and Linux platforms and includes image-based recovery and encryption capabilities. Nasuni provides scalable file storage and synchronization across multiple sites, ensures continuous file versioning, and offers rapid disaster recovery, along with global file locking and a centralized management dashboard.

Room for Improvement: Acronis Cyber Protect faces challenges with its resource-heavy installation, version compatibility issues, and tech support responsiveness. Users of Nasuni would benefit from an enhanced user interface, more training resources, and improved data synchronization efficiency. There is also a desire for Azure Active Directory integration and additional file handling features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Acronis Cyber Protect and Nasuni support Hybrid, Public, and On-premises deployments, with Acronis also supporting private cloud. Acronis is praised for straightforward deployment but criticized for inconsistent customer service. Nasuni, however, generally receives positive feedback for consistency in support, although it experiences occasional response delays.

Pricing and ROI: Acronis Cyber Protect provides various licensing options with reasonable pricing, though some users seek clearer upfront cost details. Nasuni's model is per terabyte, with additional costs for object storage and virtual machines. Users find Nasuni cost-effective due to its enterprise-level features, despite pricing escalation with extensive data usage. Both solutions are seen as providing good ROI.