ACCELQ Automate vs Eggplant Test comparison

ACCELQ and Keysight Technologies are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. ACCELQ is ranked #14 with an average rating of 9.0, while Keysight Technologies is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.3. ACCELQ holds a 1.4% mindshare in TAt, compared to Keysight Technologies’s 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ACCELQ users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Keysight Technologies users who would recommend it.

ACCELQ Automate

Read 1 ACCELQ Automate review

760 Views
760 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

Read 19 Eggplant Test reviews

3,597 Views
2,338 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

ACCELQ Automate

Eggplant Test

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ACCELQ Automate and Eggplant Test based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, UiPath and others in Test Automation Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,745 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ACCELQ Automate

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

14th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Eggplant Test

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (9th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of ACCELQ Automate is 1.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Eggplant Test is 4.0%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Eggplant Test	4.0%
ACCELQ Automate	1.4%
Other	94.6%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

PrabhuKrishnamoorthy

Senior Director at Ascendion

Provides good stability and a valuable object identification feature

We evaluated data testing for millions of records. As per architecture, it can efficiently run a few thousands of records. However, we couldn't implement it for millions of records. Thus, it works well for a small amount of data. We have 30 users for it in our organization and use it daily. I rate the scalability a ten out of ten.

Read full review

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Has required frequent manual adjustments due to screen resolution but supports simple automation with minimal effort

I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not very user-friendly. I prefer the features of UFT compared to Eggplant Test. When needing to do quick automation, I would prefer Eggplant Test, but otherwise, I would always choose UFT. It depends on the complexity of the tasks. For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective. With Eggplant Test, if you have very low complexity automation, such as simple click sequences and validation, then it would be preferable; with more complexity, I would not recommend Eggplant Test.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The platform contributes to faster test release cycles."

"Good text reading ability."

"GUI testing is the strength of the tool. The tool works as expected, and the support response from eggPlant, as a company, has been quick and substantial."

"The solution is a stable one."

"Everything is happening on the layout or display that is used by the user. Eggplant prompts processes, like 'click here,' or 'look for this image.' Eggplant makes it possible for QA people and BAs, working in the actual display, to check if the software is providing the right images, the right text, and the right results. They don't have to go inside the code or to the TCP/IP layer. Everything is happening at the highest level."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to create code from a flow chart, and then run the code through it."

"The most valuable features would be the image recognition and the OCR."

"We are able to now automate tests, which so far have been manual."

"Its scalability is good. It is useful for desktop applications, and it also uses OCR and does image recognition."

More Eggplant Test pros

Cons

"The platform's reporting aspects can be broader and include more granular details."

"Eggplant Test is not a stable solution at all in my experience."

"It has low productivity."

"The execution times are a little slower, and the two-system architecture that we currently follow could be better replaced with a one-system architecture."

"In terms of additional features, it would be helpful to have one package for all testing. You have the manager, the AI, then you have functional, and about 10 different packages for installing."

"I would like to see standardized actions already built into Eggplant. For example, "wait eight seconds". That way, I wouldn't need to create it as an action. Right now, I have to program that wait and describe it as an action so that everybody knows it is an action that waits eight seconds... That way, somebody who is not familiar with programming processes like "if-else", or "for", or "while", would be able, from the first moment, and without programming, to put some easy-to-use, standardized, actions in place."

"The IDE could be even more full-featured. Because I was a developer, I was very spoiled by either Visual Studio Code or Visual Studio for shortcuts. For example, I was able to say "ctor" and hit Tab and it would create a template of a constructor for me... It would be great, when I want to create a new function, if there were shortcut commands like those that helped create all of the functions, or if there were shortcut features to do any of the complex plans."

"The reporting function is a bit shallow. The solution does not offer very comprehensive reporting in terms of your test results. The reporting time and the logs are very high level as well. These areas need improvement."

"Its performance and stability could be better."

More Eggplant Test cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten. It can be optimized."

"End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."

"Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."

"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

"It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."

"It probably has a yearly license."

"This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ACCELQ Automate?

The platform contributes to faster test release cycles.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ACCELQ Automate?

I rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten. It can be optimized.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ACCELQ Automate?

The platform's reporting aspects can be broader and include more granular details. Additionally, there could be a capability to automatically generate automation scripts extracting the user data fr...

See all answers

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Eggplant Manager?

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 24% of the time

Testsigma vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 19% of the time

LEAPWORK vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 12% of the time

Katalon Studio vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 11% of the time

Functionize vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 11% of the time

More ACCELQ Automate Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 18% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 15% of the time

Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test

Compared 9% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Eggplant Test

Compared 7% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Eggplant Test

Compared 7% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

December 2025

Download ACCELQ Automate product report

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test

January 2026

Download Eggplant Test product report

Also Known As

No data available

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

Overview

The most powerful test automation tool for web, desktop, mainframes and more.

ACCELQ

Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

Keysight Technologies

Sample Customers

FISCHER, optanix, ERICSSON, BenifitMall, QuickPivot, DIGITALFUEL, westcreek

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

December 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, UiPath and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.