ACCELQ Automate vs Eggplant Test comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
ACCELQ Logo
962 views|803 comparisons
Keysight Technologies Logo
3,605 views|1,901 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ACCELQ Automate and Eggplant Test based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The platform contributes to faster test release cycles."

More ACCELQ Automate Pros →

"The solution is a stable one.""The most valuable feature is the ability to create code from a flow chart, and then run the code through it.""We are able to now automate tests, which so far have been manual.""The most valuable features of Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence are bug hunting and OCR technology.""The features that we like the most are the developer interface and the ability to quickly develop and deploy tests.""The main feature of Eggplant Test is that it can do fully automated web testing and app testing.""The solution is based on a Windows model, where adding users is just a few clicks. It is easy to manage users and add them.""The most valuable features would be the image recognition and the OCR."

More Eggplant Test Pros →

Cons
"The platform's reporting aspects can be broader and include more granular details."

More ACCELQ Automate Cons →

"They need to update the Linux. I think it's kind of an outdated Java Swing application.""In terms of additional features, it would be helpful to have one package for all testing. You have the manager, the AI, then you have functional, and about 10 different packages for installing.""Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence could improve by lowering the price.""We found that we had issues regarding the VPN setup, which is one of the reasons that we did not purchase this solution.""The solution would crash from time to time.""There was no free trial in it.""If one area could be improved, it would be some of their documentation. In particular, some of their online help and user support documentation is a little bit out of date and could be revised and updated on a more frequent basis. Other than that, I haven't really found any issues or problems.""Its performance and stability could be better."

More Eggplant Test Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten. It can be optimized."
  • More ACCELQ Automate Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."
  • "Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."
  • "End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."
  • "It probably has a yearly license."
  • "This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."
  • "Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."
  • More Eggplant Test Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The platform contributes to faster test release cycles.
    Top Answer:I rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten. It can be optimized.
    Top Answer:The platform's reporting aspects can be broader and include more granular details. Additionally, there could be a capability to automatically generate automation scripts extracting the user data from… more »
    Top Answer:Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence are bug hunting and OCR technology.
    Top Answer:Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence could improve by lowering the price.
    Ranking
    19th
    Views
    962
    Comparisons
    803
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    427
    Rating
    9.0
    11th
    Views
    3,605
    Comparisons
    1,901
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    477
    Rating
    7.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights
    Learn More
    Overview

    The most powerful test automation tool for web, desktop, mainframes and more.

    Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

    With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

    Sample Customers
    FISCHER, optanix, ERICSSON, BenifitMall, QuickPivot, DIGITALFUEL, westcreek
    FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Healthcare Company17%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company29%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm14%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Healthcare Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Healthcare Company13%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise66%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise72%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise73%
    Buyer's Guide
    Test Automation Tools
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    ACCELQ Automate is ranked 19th in Test Automation Tools with 1 review while Eggplant Test is ranked 11th in Test Automation Tools with 16 reviews. ACCELQ Automate is rated 9.0, while Eggplant Test is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of ACCELQ Automate writes "Provides good stability and a valuable object identification feature ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Eggplant Test writes "Empowers effective test automation with comprehensive platform coverage and scalability". ACCELQ Automate is most compared with Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete, Functionize and Testsigma, whereas Eggplant Test is most compared with Selenium HQ, Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio, SmartBear TestComplete and Oracle Application Testing Suite.

    See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.