Cisco Meraki MX Reviews

Our main use cases for Cisco Meraki MX include using it as a firewall and for guest security, specifically for our wireless guest security, and we are using it as a security firewall, MX95.

Regarding Auto VPN technology, we are using Cisco Meraki MX as a security device, and in security, we are using features such as VPN, site-to-site VPN, and guest sponsor access for Wi-Fi users. We are using Cisco Meraki MX as a security appliance for our guest users connected on the Wi-Fi network, and for VPN, we are using site-to-site VPN, which we find to be a very good solution compared to others. There are multiple features available; users can use Cisco Meraki MX as a firewall or the wireless controller.

We have sold Cisco Meraki MX, and currently, no customer has used SD-WAN features yet. However, there is an ongoing project where we are using Cisco Meraki MX as an SD-WAN solution as part of our progress.

The features of Cisco Meraki MX that I find the most effective and useful include cloud access, monitoring, and stability, along with ease of configuration. It is very user-friendly for configuration, as even L1 engineers can perform the configuration, and the GUI is very simple.

Setting up Cisco Meraki MX requires only internet access, and the rest is very simple.

We have used real-time analytics in Cisco Meraki MX for monitoring, and we have enabled it. It is very effective, though different from what we do on the DNA Assurance. It is compact, effective, and very useful.

The hardware solution for Cisco Meraki MX comes with a higher price. An improvement would be to use Cisco Meraki MX as a software solution as well, which might reduce the cost.

The price could be reduced by around 30% to make it more comfortable.

There should be a single dashboard for Cisco Meraki MX security appliance, switches, and MR wireless devices. All three should be visible in a single dashboard.

I have been working with Cisco Meraki MX for more than three years, and recently we deployed and sold Cisco Meraki MX9500 as a firewall and security solution.

We have sold Cisco Meraki MX, and currently, no customer has used SD-WAN features yet. However, there is an ongoing project where we are using Cisco Meraki MX as an SD-WAN solution as well.

There have been no issues with stability after deployment. There have been no complaints. For stability, I would suggest that Cisco Meraki MX is the most stable device from the security processor.

Regarding content filtering features, we are using content filtering and malware access, along with all security features in Cisco Meraki MX9500. We have received good feedback from customers because since installing Cisco Meraki MX9500, we have not received any complaints. There have been no outages, no stability issues, and we have not found any vulnerabilities during security audits. It is compatible with all different OEMs, and for VPN, site-to-site VPN has been configured with other firewalls as well. We are getting very good responses from customers as there have been no complaints where we have deployed Cisco Meraki MX9500.

Cisco Meraki MX is easy to scale.

Cisco's TAC support for Cisco Meraki MX is excellent because no other OEM provides support at this level. For support for Cisco Meraki MX, I would rate it as a nine.

Positive

Setting up Cisco Meraki MX is easy; we require only internet access. The rest is very simple.

The hardware solution for Cisco Meraki MX comes with a higher price. An improvement would be to use Cisco Meraki MX as a software solution, which might reduce the cost.

The price could be reduced by around 30% to make it more comfortable.

My advice for those who are considering Cisco Meraki MX is that it is a cloud-based solution wherein you can see all of your Cisco Meraki devices on a single dashboard. It is very easy to configure and manage your network through Cisco Meraki, and you can manage multiple sites and multiple branches on a single dashboard. For customers who have multiple branches and multiple offices, Cisco Meraki MX is very useful. I rate Cisco Meraki MX a nine out of ten.

Our main use case for Cisco Meraki MX is network security and centralized network management. We use it as a security gateway, firewall, and VPN access.

On a typical day, I use the Meraki dashboard to monitor network health and check for unusual traffic or connectivity issues. If a user reports that a website or application is not accessible, I can review the traffic logs and security events to determine whether the traffic is being blocked. I can then update required firewalls or security policies centrally and monitor the results without needing to be physically on-site.

Another useful aspect is centralized troubleshooting. When a remote user experiences connectivity issues, I can check the Meraki dashboard for device status, bandwidth usage, VPN connectivity, and security events. This helps us quickly identify whether the issue is related to the user's device, the network, or a security policy, and resolve it remotely without needing to access the firewall directly.

The features I rely on most are the centralized dashboard, VPN capabilities, and security and threat protection. The dashboard stands out because it gives me a clear, real-time view of network health, connected devices, traffic, and security events from one place. The VPN is useful for securely connecting remote users and sites, while the security features help monitor and block potentially harmful traffic. Overall, the biggest benefit is the ability to manage the network centrally without having to be physically on site.

Another feature I find helpful is the visibility and reporting provided through the dashboard. Being able to quickly review traffic patterns, security events, bandwidth usage, and device status makes troubleshooting much easier. I also appreciate the ease of making configuration changes centrally and having those changes applied across the network without needing to manage the firewall locally. Overall, simplicity and visibility are what make Cisco Meraki MX particularly useful for day-to-day network administration.

Cisco Meraki MX has had a positive impact by saving time, improving security, and making troubleshooting much easier. The centralized dashboard gives us a quick view of network performance and security events, allowing us to identify issues remotely. The built-in security and threat protection features help us enforce consistent security policies and respond to potential threats more efficiently. Overall, it has reduced the time spent on routine network administration and troubleshooting.

One of the main improvements has been a reduction in time required for troubleshooting and routine network administration. With the centralized Meraki dashboard, we can quickly identify connectivity issues, review traffic and security events, and make configuration changes remotely. This has reduced the need for on-site troubleshooting and helped us resolve common network issues more effectively. It has also improved visibility into network activity, making it easier to maintain consistent security policies.

One area that could be improved is providing more advanced reporting and analytics within the dashboard, especially more detailed historical data and customizable reports. It would also be useful to have greater flexibility for advanced firewall and security configuration without making the interface more complex. Better customization and more detailed troubleshooting information would also help administrators.

Another improvement would be more granular control over alerts and notifications, so administrators can prioritize critical security and network events without being overwhelmed by less important alerts. More detailed historical analysis and easier integration with third-party security and monitoring tools would also be valuable. Overall, I would keep the simplicity of the Meraki dashboard while adding more advanced options for administrators who need deeper control and visibility.

One additional improvement would be better support for integration with third-party security and monitoring platforms. More flexible APIs, deeper SIEM integration, and more detailed security analytics would make Cisco Meraki MX even more useful for organizations with a broader security stack, while the simplicity and centralized management are already strong points.

I have been using Cisco Meraki MX for about six months.

Cisco Meraki MX is pretty much stable in most cases.

Cisco Meraki MX is scalable. With the increase of the account, it can consider that and evaluate the situation. Network devices and everything can be managed centrally through the cloud dashboard. This makes it especially useful for distributed or multi-site environments.

Customer support has been good overall. If we had any kind of issues regarding the deployment of Cisco Meraki MX, the support team generally handled the situation quite well.

Before Cisco Meraki MX, we used a more traditional firewall that required more manual configuration and on-site access.

We have seen a positive return on investment, mostly through time savings and improved operational efficiency, rather than direct cost reductions. While we do not have a specific metric regarding it, we have seen a positive impact on our administrative tasks.

My experience with the pricing and licensing has been generally positive. While the upfront cost can be higher than other solutions, the initial setup cost for the simplicity, cloud-based management, and features justifies the price. The license model is straightforward. The main drawback is that recurring license costs need to be considered as part of the long-term operating budget.

Before choosing Cisco Meraki MX, we evaluated other firewalls and network security solutions, including Fortinet and traditional Cisco ASAs.

I would recommend Cisco Meraki MX to organizations looking for a simple, centralized network security and management solution. Before choosing it, I would evaluate the licensing cost, expected network growth, bandwidth requirements, and specific security features you need. The biggest advantages are the easy-to-use dashboard, centralized visibility, remote management, VPN capabilities, and straightforward troubleshooting. I would also recommend taking advantage of the trial or evaluation period.

Overall, it is a strong platform for network management. If you want to have a centralized view of your network and administrative tasks, then Cisco Meraki MX is a good device to use rather than a traditional firewall.

One of the main challenges with security policies that Cisco Meraki MX addresses is its centralized dashboard, which allows us to configure policies for all our sites, manage firewalls and VPN policies, and troubleshoot connectivity remotely from a single dashboard. This reduces the need for on-site investigation and makes it easier to maintain consistent security across the organization. I would rate this product an eight out of ten.

Cisco Meraki MX is used for SD-WAN. Organizations need URL filtering and web security content. Small and medium businesses need it because it is a bit cheaper than other products. Unified branches benefit because some models have multiple functions such as wireless, 4G connectivity, or 3G connectivity, plus some switching ports.

SD-WAN is built on Auto VPN connectivity. Auto VPN connectivity is one of the most requested features that customers ask about, and we can promote and market Cisco Meraki MX based on this function, aligned side by side with the cloud-managed feature.

The most powerful function of Cisco Meraki MX is the cloud-managed platform. You can manage all Meraki products, not only Cisco Meraki MX, through a single dashboard. This is the most important feature. The second valuable feature is flexible licensing. Basic licensing gives you a traditional firewall and a traditional router. It combines the firewall function plus routing functions. In the smaller models, even though they are small, they have a lot of functions including firewalling and routing. They have 3G, 4G connectivity, and wireless connectivity as well, plus they have ports for switches.

You do not need to sell a device for firewalling and ask for another monitoring platform plus another dashboard management. It is an all-in-one box. You can sell Cisco Meraki MX plus a license, and you get analytics and management from one dashboard on one side. This is one of the most useful features on Cisco Meraki MX because it is an all-in-one solution.

Advanced security is the second tier of Cisco Meraki MX. It brings you the main next-generation firewalling features such as URL filtering, advanced malware protection, and threat protection. This means you have a next-generation firewall that is not only a firewall. The geo-location feature on Cisco Meraki MX is very good in advanced security. Advanced security has a lot of other features, but these are the main ones. It also has flexible durations. It is not a three-year minimum requirement like Cisco Secure Firewall. You can go with one year, three years, five years, or even seven years; it is totally up to the client.

Cisco Meraki MX's content filtering has a wide range of capabilities, allowing you to filter based on the URL, group settings, and even block gambling and adult content. You can also prevent and block specific URLs, so it is simple in its configuration. That is the most important thing.

Cisco Meraki MX needs 5G connectivity on the smaller models. If there is an option to add wireless connectivity or at least 5G connectivity on all models, it would be better. The next-generation models have added and merged Cisco Secure Firewall and the new Cisco Secure Routers with Cisco Meraki MX. If they merged all lines with Cisco Meraki MX, I think it would be a very predictable and powerful platform. The most important thing is that customers need to manage Cisco Meraki MX from on-premises. If we can do that, it will not be Cisco Meraki MX at all. Cisco Meraki MX is special because it is cloud-managed. From my perspective, there is no need to improve on this side; you have to be a specialist in this area. You have to be on your way as a cloud-managed solution and do not go with customer opinions who need on-premises management.

I do not have anything in mind regarding additional features such as AI or ML because Cisco Meraki MX is targeting small and medium businesses. The functions that Cisco Meraki MX already has fit perfectly in this area of the market for small and medium businesses. However, the pricing is a bit high compared to other vendors such as Fortinet or Huawei. This is the main concern for customers.

I think this is the most important issue because if the price is a bit lower, Cisco Meraki MX will market and sell better than today.

I have been working with Cisco Meraki MX for five years.

The technical support from Cisco is fine. Cisco is one of the best vendors in the market. I would rate them between eight point five to nine out of ten.

Positive

I can compare Cisco Meraki MX with other vendors such as Fortinet, specifically FortiGate, and Huawei. If I were to compare the three vendors, I would say Cisco Meraki MX is the first one because it is easy to use and comparable. Fortinet is best because it is a security company, so its features are better. Huawei has a competitive price.

Overall, I would give Cisco Meraki MX a rating of eight out of ten.

My main uses for Cisco Meraki MX are selling to school districts, state and local government, large customers, and large commercial customers.

What I appreciate most about Cisco Meraki MX is its central management, which is easy to use. Their licenses offer flexibility with one year, five year, and seven year options that you can align with E-rate funding.

The end-to-end visibility from Cisco affects my organization's troubleshooting by making it effortless. It has AI built in so that it can pinpoint the problem without requiring external resources.

I faced some challenges with Cisco Meraki MX, but they fixed most of those issues. They had some firmware issues, but those are easily corrected from the cloud.

I have been using Cisco Meraki MX for 10 years.

I assess the stability and reliability of Cisco Meraki MX as outstanding. They stand behind their product completely. If something doesn't work, they send you another one.

I have had zero downtime at all with Cisco Meraki MX. The product is rock solid.

Cisco Meraki MX scales with the growing needs of my organization very well. It is easy to add licenses ad hoc at any point in time.

I evaluate customer service and technical support as a 10 out of 10. They are the best. TAC is unmatched.

Before selecting Cisco Meraki MX, I considered Juniper Mist.

My experience with deploying Cisco Meraki MX is that it is very easy due to its simplicity. You unbox it, connect it, and go.

I have experienced ROI with Cisco Meraki MX. Absolutely. You can eliminate some positions because it manages itself.

My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing is that pricing is challenging right now. However, cost for cost and pound for pound, it is the best dollar amount and the most value that you can find out there.

I assess the operational efficiency of Cisco in my IT environment as very high. I am Cisco certified and I have been with Cisco for a long time. I would say they are the best in the business.

My impression of the end-to-end visibility offered by Cisco is that it is unparalleled by any other technology out there. No one else can do it the way Cisco can.

The optimization with the hybrid experience is that it is a cloud-based technology. You have on-premises hardware that communicates with the central cloud, which manages all of the devices at one time.

As for Cisco as a whole, they are the best in the business. I rate this product a 10.

My main use for Cisco Meraki MX is for our retail locations. All our retail stores have connectivity back to our corporate.

What I like the most about Cisco Meraki MX is the ease of simplicity. It is easy to deploy, templatization, and security.

End-to-end visibility from Cisco helps a lot when I am troubleshooting and I have end-to-end visibility. I know exactly where the problem is. Cisco's Assurance and Cisco's Insight are really good.

I think Cisco Meraki MX can be improved by seeing more of Layer 7 firewall functions as opposed to just Layer 3. Having more applications that we can control while not hampering down the performance in the next release would be beneficial.

I have been using Cisco Meraki MX for four years now.

I would assess the stability and the reliability of Cisco Meraki MX as pretty stable. I would say it is rock solid for us.

On a scale of 1 to 10, I would evaluate customer service and technical support as 11.

Before Cisco Meraki MX, I considered other solutions, and this one was already inherited. When my previous organization was with another vendor, it was not Cisco Meraki MX but it was Viptela. We did a comparison of all the other SD-WAN solutions because that was our first SD-WAN deployment. We compared all options, including Silver Peak and VMware Cloud. Cisco Viptela came out on top.

The deployment process with Cisco Meraki MX was pretty easy.

I have seen returns on investments with Cisco Meraki MX. It greatly helps out when I am moving away from the expensive MPLS circuits or MPLS hardware. Provisioning is really easy.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing when I got it is that licensing cost with Cisco is always good. Pricing of Cisco Meraki MX hardware is pretty reasonable as compared to others. I am pretty happy with it.

I assess the operational efficiency of Cisco in my IT environment as really good. Cisco is really good across all uses. I have used Meraki, Catalyst Center, SD-WAN, Catalyst switches, and Wi-Fi. The ease is really good. Functionality-wise, Cisco always delivers on what they advertise.

I did face some challenges when I was doing the deployment, but not with Cisco Meraki MX. With Viptela, we did have a big challenge where the utilization numbers were initially slow. I am glad that Cisco caught it before we deployed, as the numbers were cutting it really slow. That was a big challenge as we had to re-architect because I selected one hardware A for looking for my throughput and then Cisco said I could not support that throughput, so I had to go for hardware B.

I give this review an overall rating of 10.

Cisco Meraki MX is mainly found in restaurants, restaurant cafes, and other restaurant-type environments. Because of the seamless integration at the back end with Cisco Meraki MX, you are almost certain that there are no hitches.

People have gotten used to it, and even clients will be asking me for specific models because they are well-versed with the product when discussing visibility.

This is very powerful because, as a brand, it is widely known, widely used, and widely accepted when discussing the advantages of the tool. The security aspect on Cisco Meraki MX is very nice, which is one of the specific features that I appreciate.

The predictability and app mode features of Cisco Meraki MX, especially in the use of restaurant Wi-Fi, stand out. The collaboration with other vendors such as Webex, Teams, Zoom, and even Google Meet is hinged onto Cisco. This is readily available and in use, as Cisco helps to address challenges in hybrid and distributed enterprise networks.

When you use the hybrid services with Cisco, the user experience is much more enhanced, and integration is seamless. Cisco Meraki MX is pretty easy to troubleshoot because visibility is super easy to detect, and the data, especially for endpoints and other things, is pretty easy to gather.

The reporting for third-party solutions with Cisco Meraki MX could be improved. There is a slight gap, so you may find some reporting on those devices not being catered for.

I find it very expensive when discussing the cost of Cisco Meraki MX. A lot of very good features in some of those other vendors such as Fortinet are quick to adapt to new technology, and their upgrades are much quicker and less expensive.

It is not very easy to achieve 100% return on the product because you need technical expertise in installation, and that is not exactly straightforward. I would like to see enhanced AI capability added in the future. They could enhance it in analytics, especially in that area.

I started working with Cisco Meraki MX approximately five years ago.

Stability with Cisco Meraki MX is almost guaranteed, and it is pretty high.

It is not easy to scale because it has some limitations when you try to expand. The limitation is technical expertise needed to be able to go from one layer to the next; for example, you probably need a new device.

I previously rated support for Cisco Meraki MX as six points out of ten. The first issue is a time delay. Secondly, you do not just get the support that you actually require; you get mixed and matched solutions or broad-based answers to specific queries, and that is very frustrating.

ROI in the long term is a plus, and it is realized pretty fast, but that is in the long term, not immediately. Between 25 and 30% is what you might see when talking about savings.

Pricing-wise, Cisco Meraki MX is number one; it has a clear lead over competitors because it is more expensive than all the others put together.

The client is actually aware of what they need and which model they are looking for. I would rate this product seven out of ten.

I work mostly with Cisco products, including Cisco switches, Catalyst switches, routers, and Cisco Meraki MX, specifically the access points, firewall, MX, MR, and MS.

I have been both a user of Cisco Meraki MX and someone who performs configurations, installation, and support for Meraki customers.

I have been both a customer and a reseller of Cisco. I use Cisco Meraki MX in my office and have deployed it for several customers.

I assess the operational efficiency of Cisco in my IT environment as quite robust. I believe it is one of the best networking solutions available. They have very good products, especially in terms of operational resilience, and they are able to run for long periods without issues with an uptime that I consider among the best I have seen. Several features keep network admins at ease and make it easier with their support for those products that have Smart Net or support contract subscriptions that assist through TAC.

I find that Cisco offers a substantial number of tools for end-to-end visibility, either working from the Cisco side or integrating with other vendors. I know there is Catalyst, previously known as DNA, and all Cisco products come with that subscription license for integration, making it quite a handy tool for seeing the end-to-end visibility of my network operations.

Regarding Cisco Meraki MX, I find the cloud management quite handy, allowing me to access dashboards that provide good telemetry and insightful data about the performance of my network, including the kind of access users have or the resources they are able to access over the network. It also gives health insights, health checks, and updates from Cisco Talos and their utilities to keep me informed about changes in technology, particularly in security.

I feel that Cisco Meraki MX is less of a next-generation firewall. In my assessment, compared to most next-generation firewalls from Fortinet and Palo Alto, it seems more like an application firewall and could be improved further. While it has some nice features, for a very large organization needing comprehensive next-generation firewall features, it could perform better. Aligning it more towards those features would be very handy, as well as broadening the market appeal beyond SMEs to include larger corporations.

In the future, I would appreciate additional features beyond next-generation firewall capabilities, particularly better integration with deployment at various network levels, operating effectively as a data center firewall and controlling east-west traffic for campus access. Such features would make it a versatile option across network positions.

I have been working with Cisco Meraki MX for the last six years.

I assess the stability and reliability of Cisco Meraki MX as quite reliable. The only issue is that without access to the internet, it may not control east-west traffic effectively. However, it is quite useful at the perimeter and well-addressed for the features most SMEs require.

I find that Cisco Meraki MX scales well for most solutions, primarily designed for the small market. I am uncertain if they have products for larger markets, though I know they produce different tiers based on throughput. In terms of integration with other solutions, it performs adequately and seamlessly. However, larger needs may necessitate higher models in terms of capacity and performance.

I rate their technical support as a ten out of ten.

I would describe the experience with deploying Cisco Meraki MX as very straightforward and easy. Cisco provides excellent documentation, making it accessible even for those who are not highly versed in networking. Once you set it up with basic network knowledge, implementation is seamless since it is mainly GUI-based with no CLI required, which is beneficial for those without extensive security deployment knowledge.

I find the pricing for Cisco Meraki MX reasonable and competitive given the features provided and the target market. I believe it is acceptable.

I see some good competition, particularly from Sophos, which I consider quite a challenger in the SMEs market, and Fortinet with some low-cost firewalls that bring next-generation features that Cisco Meraki MX does not have, indicating a significant competitive landscape.

Overall, I give them an 8 out of 10, noting that there is great competition available, and I believe they have room to improve or catch up with the competition. I assign this product a review rating of 8.

My main use case for Cisco Meraki MX is primarily for SD-WAN and security.

Cisco Meraki MX has impacted my organization positively. I'm selling it to other customers and partners, which means it's very important for them, and I see this is making a significant positive impact for them.

The positive impact I've seen for my customers is that Cisco Meraki MX means easy management, easy setup or scale up, and flexible licensing.

In my opinion, the best features Cisco Meraki MX offers are the best security features.

What I personally appreciate most about Cisco Meraki MX is cloud management and Meraki protection filtering.

Specifically, what I value about the cloud management and protection features is the ease of use plus scalability. You can scale up or scale down, and the auto update feature is excellent.

I would add that auto VPN is a great feature as well.

I believe Cisco Meraki MX can be improved if its price were lower; it would be significantly better.

Additionally, I would highlight the need for full integration with legacy Cisco SPs as a required improvement.

I have been working with Cisco Meraki MX since it was acquired by Cisco in 2012, and since then, I have also worked with Meraki MR and MS.

Cisco Meraki MX is, in my experience, top stable.

The scalability of Cisco Meraki MX is rated 10 out of 10; you can scale up and scale down with no effort.

The customer support for Cisco Meraki MX is great because it's part of Cisco, so the support from Meraki is the same as Cisco. I can rate it nine out of 10.

Positive

I previously used a different solution before Cisco Meraki MX, which was Fortinet.

I switched from Fortinet to Cisco Meraki MX because while security in Fortinet is stronger than Meraki since it's a security company, the management for Cisco Meraki MX is better than Fortinet.

I have seen a return on investment with Cisco Meraki MX because of the time saved through cloud management. It saves cost as well because it's controller-less; you don't have a separate controller or separate management platform.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Cisco Meraki MX is that for more than five years, Meraki licensing has always increased. If Cisco can make the pricing less, customers can purchase more licenses. This would enable customers to buy more than they currently do.

Before choosing Cisco Meraki MX, I evaluated other options besides Fortinet, including Huawei, because it's cheaper.

A specific example of how I use Cisco Meraki MX for security in my organization is that you can describe it as a router with a flavor of security, or you can describe it as a firewall with a flavor of router. This means you can use it as a router or a firewall with routing capabilities such as RIP and VPN, along with threat and protection features.

My advice to others looking into using Cisco Meraki MX is to understand the difference between cloud management and a cloud solution. Don't view it as a cloud solution; it's a cloud-managed solution and it's totally different. Sell it to your customer as a cloud-managed solution, not as a cloud solution.

I chose this rating because the cloud management is really effective. I rate this review a 9 out of 10.

The main use cases for my customers with Meraki MX are cloud managed virtual controller, basically for managing the Wi-Fi, managing the switches, managing everything through software defined, cloud managed solutions. There is great flexibility with no need to be in the office every time to do network maintenance or for changing Wi-Fi passwords configurations specific, event based SSID creations.

A lot of activities can be achieved in work from home scenarios as well. Many of the use cases nowadays involve majority of data center switches and data center firewalls being upgraded to Meraki MX for convenience, flexibility and software-defined solutions. Apart from this they also have the solution for the management of users logins based on the authorization authentication in a uniform manner. Many of these features are unique in the brand.

The other features that are most useful for network security are that they are the leaders in the market in cloud managed network security. Their SD-WAN solutions are very effective and most cases now involve VPN-less access for the majority of companies' private networks.

These became Zero Trust networks and Zero Trust access. Meraki MX is among those top solutions in their exceptional approach towards VPN-less, Zero Trust client access to office private networks.

The SD-WAN capability of Meraki MX enhances network performance by reducing bandwidth utilization and increases availability. Additionally, multiple branches in different countries and continents can be connected as one WAN network, making all users connected continuously with convenience. Separate authentication is not required to access networks in different countries. All this becomes completely seamless, saving time and reducing security risks.

The highest security algorithms are configured between these branches over the SD-WAN, where the network becomes uniform across the world. Users have service access or network access without knowing they are actually in different countries or cities. Additionally, passwordless authentications enhance the user experience. By increasing these user experiences, productivity has been enhanced across companies and client employees.

I recommend that Meraki MX should improve to be a better solution for the next release by being more competent so that we can offer it as a primary solution among all other brands, although I don't have any specific feedback, while the competitors are also ahead of these solutions.

Enhancing user experience is always required. Enhancing the seamless connectivity is crucial and user experience enhancement is needed daily, otherwise people find it outdated. New features should look and be dynamically connected, and users should not be bothered frequently when connectivity issues occur. It should automatically remediate and find out the issue and then resolve it on its own without interrupting the work of the employees.

I have been working with the Cisco solutions with Meraki MX for about 7-8 years.

Meraki MX is using AI to improve network management and security. AI is one among those additional layers of convenience added. It reduces the IT manager's job and IT mistakes, manual processes, and configuration errors.

AI operations function seamlessly when you add a client, as it knows how to segregate the client. It will automatically add the policies and generate the client-related specific employee security policies, giving access based on the segregation we apply.

Meraki MX is easy to set up, I would rate it 9 out of 10.

Overall, Meraki MX is very stable, I would rate it 9 out of 10.

Scalability is an obvious concern with Meraki MX. You can't scale beyond some value. They are not highly enterprise grade, when you have hundreds of thousands of people it is very difficult to scale in Meraki.

I have seen usual challenges with Meraki MX, such as sometimes we don't get the access points online, or connectivity related issues. When we raise a ticket with Meraki MX, they instantly become available to support us for configurations or troubleshooting. In the majority of cases Cisco support is good. We immediately get the support to solve the issues, in case of any challenges or incidents.

I can rate the support 10 out of 10.

Positive

Meraki MX is obviously expensive.

The cost of a device varies based on the Meraki MX device, whereas if you buy the same access point in Aruba, it is three times costlier. I get it for $25,000, a device that can connect up to 75-100 users, whereas in Meraki MX, it goes to 75,000-80,000 per access point.

I am an implementer.

My clients are small to medium businesses, with about 800,000 employees to 2,000 employees. They are mainly in IT, manufacturing, pharma, schools, and universities.

I recommend that for a class experience for security reasons, or convenience management, cloud-based solution, when you look at all of them, people should prefer Meraki MX as leaders in software-defined networks and cloud managed networks. I rate Meraki MX 9 out of 10.

My main use case for Cisco Meraki MX is to connect the different sites of a company, forming an SD-WAN across all the sites.

A concrete example of how this solution made communication or work easier between the company's different sites is that, since it has a centralized web configuration panel, it allows remote configuration of the device. Additionally, you can send them by mail and once they are connected to the power supply they automatically receive the configuration.

I consider the best features that Cisco Meraki MX offers to be the ease of configuration and the performance.

In terms of configuration, I find it very simple through device tagging; with those tags, different configurations are added. Having a web panel and having device maps also helps a lot. In terms of performance, these are devices that work very well, they do not overheat, they maintain high availability and also allow you to use more than one fiber-optic connection, for example.

I would like to add that it frees you from having to use MPLS networks that depend on carriers, which are much more expensive.

Cisco Meraki MX has positively impacted my organization by reducing deployment time for new sites and reducing communication costs.

To achieve that reduction in time and costs, previously you had to send a person to a site to finish installing and configuring the device. Now I save that because I configure the device centrally and it is just a matter of delivering it; it then receives that configuration and is fully operational.

I think Cisco Meraki MX could improve its price and perhaps enhance the ease of deployment of the root device that can be deployed in the Azure cloud, for example.

I would like the ease of deploying the root device in the cloud to be as a marketplace product that is more configurable, can be deployed more easily, and above all that there was clearer documentation.

I have been using this tool for about three years.

I consider Cisco Meraki MX a stable solution.

I would describe the scalability of Cisco Meraki MX as being one of its strengths, as it can scale by adding new devices and adapt to newer or older devices, which sets it apart.

My experience with Cisco Meraki MX customer support has been fine.

Before Cisco Meraki MX, we used MPLS networks from the communications carrier, and we switched because they were really expensive and did not offer this granularity and control by our company.

There are specific challenges my organization faces with hybrid and distributed enterprise networks that Cisco Meraki MX has helped to solve, such as having greater control of traffic between sites, having greater security, and enabling or disabling services on a regular basis.

A concrete example of how the tool has improved security or control between sites is by enabling guest Wi-Fi networks at each site with a customized bandwidth cap and increased security.

I have seen a return on investment with Cisco Meraki MX, as communications have improved by between twenty percent and thirty percent.

My experience with the price, implementation cost, and licenses of Cisco Meraki MX is that it could be a bit cheaper. It is not a cheap product.

The aspects I find bothersome include the pricing structure, and also problems that occurred in distribution, because there were logistical issues and no devices available.

I did not evaluate other options before choosing Cisco Meraki MX.

I assess the impact of Cisco Meraki MX in my IT environment as having greatly improved operational efficiency, processes, management, and incident resolution.

A concrete example of how operational efficiency has improved is in device deployment and subsequent configurations, avoiding the need to connect device by device, since everything is done through profiles or tags, and the initial delivery of the devices is also much faster.

I rate the end-to-end visibility that Cisco Meraki MX offers as very useful for monitoring and troubleshooting.

That visibility has influenced my organization's ability to resolve incidents or detect network problems significantly, as it helps you detect any deficiency that may be found at a site, to find problems with Wi-Fi access points and, in addition, it helps you find possible security risks you may have within your networks by seeing suspicious traffic.

My advice to other people who are considering implementing Cisco Meraki MX is that they should request a device for a demo if they have any doubts. I rate my overall experience with Cisco Meraki MX as nine out of ten.