

Cisco Meraki MX and Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW) are both prominent players in the network security domain. Meraki MX is known for its user-friendly interface and cloud management capabilities, making it ideal for businesses seeking simplicity. On the other hand, Check Point Quantum excels in offering a wide array of advanced security features.
Features: Cisco Meraki MX offers centralized cloud management, superior security features like IDS/IPS, and an easy-to-use setup with automatic updates. Check Point Quantum Force provides advanced threat prevention, comprehensive security management, and robust VPN capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Meraki MX could improve in areas like load balancing, local port control, and third-party integration expansion. Its configuration granularity also needs enhancement. Check Point Quantum Force could benefit from simplifying its CLI, streamlining upgrades, and enhancing documentation for better initial setup.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Cisco Meraki MX and Check Point Quantum Force support various deployment environments including on-premises and public cloud. Meraki MX stands out for its straightforward deployment and outstanding customer support. Check Point often demands more expertise during setup, especially for complex deployments, and its customer support requires improvements for quicker response times.
Pricing and ROI: The pricing for Cisco Meraki MX is considered high but justified by its ease of management and reduced operational downtime, making it cost-effective for those preferring simpler management. Check Point Quantum Force also commands a premium price but delivers valuable security features. The ROI for both products correlates with the organization’s specific needs, with Meraki focusing on ease and Check Point emphasizing comprehensive security.
This is a time-saving measure because we don't need to deploy a cluster or a firewall each time; we just create a virtual system on the management server using the same appliance.
Not having major security incidents has been far less expensive than dealing with data that could cost us hundreds of thousands or even millions in recovery and downtime.
Incident response time has reduced significantly, and downtime due to network issues has been minimized, leading to an improved return on investment.
I have seen a return on investment with Cisco Meraki MX because of the time saved through cloud management.
You can eliminate some positions because it manages itself.
It greatly helps out when I am moving away from the expensive MPLS circuits or MPLS hardware.
If we have an urgent security problem, it would be nice to get a faster response.
The support team we engaged was knowledgeable and well-versed with the application.
We have escalated issues to Check Point technical support multiple times and have received timely and very good responses.
The support is excellent, earning a rating of ten out of ten.
Every time I got a hold of someone, I was always able to resolve my issues.
When we raise a ticket with Meraki MX, they instantly become available to support us for configurations or troubleshooting.
If specified correctly, even the smaller boxes offer high session and bandwidth rates, making the solution highly scalable, even up to telco-level requirements.
It is easy to scale up by adding capacity through clustering or upgrading the license, and it effectively handles spikes in remote user connections or increased east-west traffic without noticeable bottlenecks.
While the performance itself scales well technically, you need to be prepared for the financial side of the growth.
When you have hundreds of thousands of people it is very difficult to scale in Meraki.
The scalability of Cisco Meraki MX is rated 10 out of 10; you can scale up and scale down with no effort.
Cisco Meraki MX scales with my growing needs for my organization very well because they are easy to deploy.
We have not experienced major crashes or unexpected downtime that affected our network security.
While the solution is generally stable, there are complications, such as requiring SmartConsole for deployment and upgrades, which can be time-consuming.
I have worked with Check Point products for 15 years and haven't found any stability or performance issues.
There have been no outages, no stability issues, and we have not found any vulnerabilities during security audits.
I have had zero downtime at all with Cisco Meraki MX.
I assess the stability and the reliability of Cisco Meraki MX as good, and I have experienced no downtime, crashes, or performance issues.
AI-driven features would be highly valuable—particularly those that enable bulk operations and efficient handling of large numbers of objects or object groups.
One thing that would help in improving Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW) is having more flexible dashboards that I can tailor without relying on templates.
Other products, like FortiGate, are perceived as more intuitive because they are easier to configure from the start.
It should automatically remediate and find out the issue and then resolve it on its own without interrupting the work of the employees.
Data is the only path, so optimization is essential.
An improvement would be to use Cisco Meraki MX as a software solution as well, which might reduce the cost.
In comparison to Fortinet and other products, the pricing may be considered high.
licensing is very pricey
Compared to other solutions, the pricing of Check Point NGFW is high.
I get it for $25,000, a device that can connect up to 75-100 users, whereas in Meraki MX, it goes to 75,000-80,000 per access point.
The price could be reduced by around 30% to make it more comfortable.
If Cisco can make the pricing less, customers can purchase more licenses.
The firewall's default behavior of blocking all traffic, including a cleanup rule that blocks everything from external to internal sources, is highly valuable for protecting our network.
The most valuable features in my experience include perimeter firewalling, cloud and mobile security, application control, URL filtering, DLP, threat prevention, intrusion protection, and safeguarding against malware, botnets, and zero-day attacks.
Since implementing it, we have noticed a lot less getting through that maybe other antivirus within firewalls had failed to catch.
Meraki MX is among those top solutions in their exceptional approach towards VPN-less, Zero Trust client access to office private networks.
Advanced security is the second tier of Cisco Meraki MX. It brings you the main next-generation firewalling features such as URL filtering, advanced malware protection, and threat protection.
Cisco Meraki MX API makes it really easy for me to automate a lot of changes over several thousand devices.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW) | 8.3% |
| Cisco Meraki MX | 8.3% |
| Other | 83.4% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 164 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 93 |
| Large Enterprise | 199 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 50 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 23 |
| Large Enterprise | 20 |
Check Point Quantum Force NGFW is a robust next-generation firewall offering advanced threat prevention, application control, and unified management capabilities, making it a preferred choice for securing network infrastructures for organizations.
Famed for its centralized management and scalability, Check Point Quantum Force NGFW provides comprehensive protection with features like deep packet inspection, VPN management, and threat emulation. Organizations benefit from its user-friendly design, efficient network performance improvement, and strong AI-driven threat prevention capabilities. However, configuring the system can be complex, and licensing remains unclear for some users. Experienced personnel are often required due to slow policy installations and costly expenses. Administrators face challenges with VPN setup and demand better support response times, centralized management, and real-time updates for antivirus. Enhancements in third-party integration and automation are also sought after.
What are the key features of Check Point Quantum Force NGFW?Industries deploying Check Point Quantum Force NGFW often use it as a perimeter firewall across multiple devices and sites for securing corporate data and controlling network traffic. It is instrumental in safeguarding critical infrastructure such as servers and end-user equipment while supporting seamless remote worker VPN access. It's commonly implemented across healthcare, finance, and governmental organizations, enhancing their security frameworks and protecting sensitive data.
Cisco Meraki MX offers centralized management for network security and SD-WAN, featuring advanced threat protection, VPN capabilities, and seamless integration with other Cisco products. It enhances operational efficiency through cloud management and intuitive interface.
Cisco Meraki MX is designed for ease of use with a user-friendly cloud management platform that provides real-time insights through a centralized dashboard. It includes AutoVPN for secure remote connections and advanced threat protection to ensure consistent policy enforcement. Its integration capabilities with Cisco products streamline network administration. Users highlight the need for improvements in advanced reporting, detailed alerts, and enhanced API flexibility. Cost concerns are noted, alongside desires for better security analytics and improved customer support.
What are the key features of Cisco Meraki MX?Cisco Meraki MX is implemented in industries like telecommunications and healthcare for secure network management and centralized control. It supports zero-touch deployment, dynamic routing, and traffic shaping, making it ideal for ISPs and multi-site environments, as well as managing Wi-Fi networks and guest security for wireless users.
We monitor all Unified Threat Management (UTM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.