Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Cisco MDS Series Logo

Cisco MDS Series Reviews

Vendor: Cisco
4.6 out of 5

What is Cisco MDS Series?

Featured Cisco MDS Series reviews

Cisco MDS Series mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of Cisco MDS Series in the Enterprise SAN category stands at 6.7%, down from 9.0% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise SAN Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Cisco MDS Series6.7%
Dell PowerStore23.3%
Dell PowerVault21.2%
Other48.8%
Enterprise SAN
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Mar 27, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business30
Midsize Enterprise20
Large Enterprise47
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
15%
Government
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Healthcare Company
8%
Legal Firm
6%
Educational Organization
5%
Financial Services Firm
4%
Wholesaler/Distributor
3%
Construction Company
3%
Media Company
3%
Non Profit
3%
Performing Arts
3%
University
3%
Comms Service Provider
3%
Non Tech Company
2%
Insurance Company
2%
Transportation Company
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Leisure / Travel Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Import And Exporter
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Energy/Utilities Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Mining And Metals Company
1%
 
Cisco MDS Series Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
system engineer at Yaşar Holding5.0I use Cisco MDS for SAN connections and find it very stable, performing well, and easy to set up. While excellent and scalable, its high cost prevents me from affording central management. I rate it 10/10.
Sr. Cloud Systems Engineer at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees3.0Our company uses Cisco MDS Series primarily for fiber channel connectivity due to their valuable SAN switches. However, the management interface and GUI need improvement. We did not consider alternative solutions, and our deployment does not involve a cloud provider.
Technology director at Infodive Representações e Serviços ltda5.0I appreciate the Cisco MDS Series for its reliability, support, and scalability, which have delivered a positive ROI for me. While I've considered Brocade as an alternative, I've found the gradual addition of gigahertz in Cisco MDS satisfactory.
Consultant at Pi DATACENTERS5.0I find the Cisco MDS Series offers excellent performance, stability, and security for my storage needs. Setup was straightforward, and support is great. I wish it had better SAN management and API features.
system engineer at Yaşar Holding5.0We use the Cisco MDS Series in SAN environments for server connections because it is stable, doesn't relapse during updates, and is easy to use. However, the product is very expensive, which is a significant drawback in its adoption.
Sr. Cloud Systems Engineer at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0I find Cisco MDS Series stable and scalable, valuing its devices and zoning. However, the Java-based GUI is insecure, initial setup was complex, and I believe the management software license should be included. I recommend training.
Solution Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees5.0I find the Cisco MDS 9148 highly reliable, easy to deploy and administer, saving costs by avoiding professional services. Its performance is excellent, with robust redundancy and security. My only suggestions are for improved firmware management and a more accessible WebUI.
Solution Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees5.0I've found Cisco MDS Series switches highly reliable, stable, and predictable for SAN use over many years. Their integration with Cisco ecosystems is valuable. While the licensing model is complicated, I still prefer them for their strong performance.