We performed a comparison between Azure Site Recovery and IBM Disaster Recovery Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Commvault, Nutanix and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service."They're moving a lot of their workload to cloud and aiming for a seamlessly integrated product."
"We use the solution across hospitality and healthcare domains. We use it for custom development. It helps us develop a seamless omnichannel for the healthcare industry."
"Azure Site Recovery helps to save costs."
"What I love about Azure Site Recovery is its simplicity for basic configurations."
"The documentation is good, and it can be integrated with other products."
"Provides generally good performance, from protection to production to failover to data recovery."
"Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore."
"What I like best about Azure Site Recovery is that it's easier to use because my organization already has Azure as an Active Directory solution."
"The solution works well for very large organizations. It can scale quite well."
"Disaster Recovery Services is stable."
"The primary area for improvement in Azure Site Recovery is its pricing."
"Site Recovery's scalability could be improved."
"One area for improvement with Azure is helping customers predict usage more accurately."
"The pricing predictability and clarity around the final cost of the plan of this solution could be improved."
"I would like to see more security features."
"In the newest version of Azure Site Recovery, the configuration was a little more complex, so this is an area for improvement."
"It is for site-to-site replication. When something goes wrong on your site, you only get 15 minutes before it also goes wrong on your replicated site. There should be some way to be able to say that we want to restore it, but we want to restore it to the version from yesterday. It should support versioning. I would also like to see real-time scanning for advanced threat protection, more straightforward billing, and quicker turnaround on the tech support."
"Could have more integration with other platforms."
"Disaster Recovery Services could provide better value for money."
"The infrastructure level of IBM's recovery systems could be improved."
More IBM Disaster Recovery Services Pricing and Cost Advice →
Azure Site Recovery is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 18 reviews while IBM Disaster Recovery Services is ranked 5th in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 2 reviews. Azure Site Recovery is rated 8.2, while IBM Disaster Recovery Services is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Disaster Recovery Services writes "Quite stable with good scalability for large organizations but the recovery system infrastructure could be better". Azure Site Recovery is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, VMware SRM, Zerto, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, whereas IBM Disaster Recovery Services is most compared with Precisely Assure MIMIX and Sungard Disaster Recovery Services.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery as a Service vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.