Top 10 VMWare Avi Load Balancer Alternatives

4.1 out of 5

8 reviews
71% willing to recommend

Top VMWare Avi Load Balancer Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to VMWare Avi Load Balancer based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), and NetScaler. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Broadcom Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Broadcom, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

3.7 out of 5

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

3.7 out of 5

VMWare Avi Load Balancer offers detailed visibility and flexible deployment, appealing to those prioritizing analytics and integration. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway provides robust WAF capabilities and seamless cloud automation, ideal for those seeking strong security features and cloud platform integration.

Download Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. VMWare Avi Load Balancer Report

Pricing

VMWare Avi Load Balancer offers competitive setup costs, while Microsoft Azure Application Gateway presents a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant cost difference.

View comparison

Pricing

VMWare Avi Load Balancer offers competitive setup costs, while Microsoft Azure Application Gateway presents a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant cost difference.

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)

4.1 out of 5

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)

4.1 out of 5

F5 BIG-IP LTM offers powerful hardware capabilities and extensive features like iRules and advanced proxy functions. In comparison, VMware Avi Load Balancer excels in ease of deployment and robust analytics, making it ideal for cloud-native environments demanding agility and seamless cloud integration.

Download F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs. VMWare Avi Load Balancer Report

Pricing

The setup cost for F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is higher than the VMWare Avi Load Balancer, which offers a more budget-friendly entry point.

View comparison

Pricing

The setup cost for F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is higher than the VMWare Avi Load Balancer, which offers a more budget-friendly entry point.

NetScaler

4.2 out of 5

NetScaler

4.2 out of 5

Citrix NetScaler offers flexible deployment and robust application delivery. In comparison, VMware Avi Load Balancer provides agile deployment and intuitive analytics. Citrix NetScaler excels in security and integration, while VMware Avi Load Balancer is favored for cost-effectiveness and user-friendly features in cloud environments.

Download NetScaler vs. VMWare Avi Load Balancer Report

Pricing

NetScaler offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while VMWare Avi Load Balancer requires a higher investment but provides advanced features.

View comparison

Pricing

NetScaler offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while VMWare Avi Load Balancer requires a higher investment but provides advanced features.

HAProxy

4.1 out of 5

HAProxy

4.1 out of 5

HAProxy offers cost-effectiveness with open-source flexibility, ideal for simple load balancing. In comparison, VMware Avi Load Balancer provides enterprise-level features and robust analytics. HAProxy suits low-cost deployments, whereas VMware Avi Load Balancer appeals to those needing advanced functionality and support.

Download HAProxy vs. VMWare Avi Load Balancer Report

Pricing

HAProxy offers a lower setup cost compared to VMWare Avi Load Balancer, which requires a more substantial initial investment. These differences reflect the contrasting initial expenses associated with each product.

View comparison

Pricing

NGINX Plus

4.3 out of 5

NGINX Plus

4.3 out of 5

NGINX Plus excels in offering configuration flexibility and performance optimization for technical teams. In comparison, VMWare Avi Load Balancer simplifies deployment and provides strong analytics, making it appealing for those needing easy management and integration with Kubernetes environments.

Download NGINX Plus vs. VMWare Avi Load Balancer Report

Pricing

NGINX Plus has a straightforward initial setup cost, while VMWare Avi Load Balancer requires a more complex setup with higher initial investment, reflecting their distinct pricing structures.

View comparison

Pricing

NGINX Plus has a straightforward initial setup cost, while VMWare Avi Load Balancer requires a more complex setup with higher initial investment, reflecting their distinct pricing structures.

Fortinet FortiADC

3.9 out of 5

Fortinet FortiADC

3.9 out of 5

Fortinet FortiADC attracts with robust security and cost-effectiveness, appealing to budget-conscious buyers through competitive pricing and strong support. In comparison, VMWare Avi Load Balancer offers advanced analytics and seamless multi-cloud integration, justifying its higher cost with a strong long-term ROI.

Download Fortinet FortiADC vs. VMWare Avi Load Balancer Report

Pricing

Fortinet FortiADC typically has a lower initial setup cost compared to VMWare Avi Load Balancer, which often involves a higher initial investment. While Fortinet FortiADC offers cost-effectiveness, VMware Avi Load Balancer provides higher upfront expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Radware Alteon

4.3 out of 5

Radware Alteon

4.3 out of 5

Radware Alteon offers robust security and global load balancing, ideal for users needing strong application protection and scalability. In comparison, VMware Avi Load Balancer provides deployment flexibility and advanced analytics, catering to users seeking adaptable solutions with a cloud-focused approach.

Download Radware Alteon vs. VMWare Avi Load Balancer Report

Pricing

Radware Alteon has higher initial setup costs compared to VMWare Avi Load Balancer, which offers more cost-effective initial deployment while maintaining robust functionality.

View comparison

Pricing

Radware Alteon has higher initial setup costs compared to VMWare Avi Load Balancer, which offers more cost-effective initial deployment while maintaining robust functionality.

Kemp LoadMaster

4.7 out of 5

Kemp LoadMaster

4.7 out of 5

Kemp LoadMaster offers cost-effective pricing and ease of use with configuration templates and geo-redundancy. In comparison, VMware Avi Load Balancer provides comprehensive features and flexibility with robust analytics and API security, making it suitable for environments needing advanced capabilities.

Download Kemp LoadMaster vs. VMWare Avi Load Balancer Report

Pricing

Kemp LoadMaster offers straightforward setup costs, while VMWare Avi Load Balancer has a more complex pricing structure.

View comparison

Pricing

Kemp LoadMaster offers straightforward setup costs, while VMWare Avi Load Balancer has a more complex pricing structure.

A10 Networks Thunder ADC

4.2 out of 5

A10 Networks Thunder ADC

4.2 out of 5

A10 Networks Thunder ADC offers cost-effective solutions with all-inclusive licensing and advanced traffic management, making it ideal for straightforward deployments. In comparison, VMWare Avi Load Balancer excels in complex environments with feature-rich capabilities, analytics, and flexible deployment options across various cloud environments.

Download A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs. VMWare Avi Load Balancer Report

Pricing

A10 Networks Thunder ADC has a competitive setup cost recognized for its affordability, while VMWare Avi Load Balancer is noted for its higher initial expense, reflecting enhanced features.

View comparison

Pricing

A10 Networks Thunder ADC has a competitive setup cost recognized for its affordability, while VMWare Avi Load Balancer is noted for its higher initial expense, reflecting enhanced features.

Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall

4.5 out of 5

Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall

4.5 out of 5

Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall delivers scalable application security for off-the-shelf and custom applications, including third-party frameworks. Apply business rules to online traffic, inspect and block attacks such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting (XSS), and filter outgoing traffic and data to mask credit card data. Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall helps achieve compliance with PCI-DSS requirements.

View comparison

Related categories

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Network Management Applications