Akamai Ion vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer comparison

Akamai and VMware are both solutions in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category. Akamai is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.5, while VMware is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.5. Akamai holds a 0.7% mindshare in ADC, compared to VMware’s 5.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of VMware users who would recommend it.

Akamai Ion

Read 2 Akamai Ion reviews

242 Views
162 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

VMWare Avi Load Balancer

Read 8 VMWare Avi Load Balancer reviews

2,099 Views
1,376 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

Akamai Ion

VMWare Avi Load Balancer

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

VMware Avi Load Balancer and Akamai Ion are contenders in load balancing and application performance optimization. Akamai Ion offers superior performance and capabilities, justifying its higher price for many users.

Features: VMware Avi is noted for advanced analytics, automation capabilities, and operational efficiency, which enhance backend infrastructure management. Akamai Ion focuses on robust traffic management, significant acceleration features, and optimized web performance, emphasizing frontend delivery speed.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware Avi provides straightforward software deployment, seamlessly integrating with existing infrastructure, and has responsive customer support. Akamai Ion's extensive feature set makes setup complex; however, it offers reliable support to aid the process, reflecting comprehensive deployment that requires detailed guidance.

Pricing and ROI: VMware Avi is a cost-effective solution with favorable ROI, driven by lower initial costs and efficient resource management. Akamai Ion requires a higher setup investment, balanced by performance gains and long-term ROI through enhanced web application delivery, appealing to organizations prioritizing performance and innovation.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai Ion vs. VMWare Avi Load Balancer Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Akamai Ion vs. VMWare Avi Load Balancer

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai Ion

Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

14th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMWare Avi Load Balancer

Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category, the mindshare of Akamai Ion is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMWare Avi Load Balancer is 5.1%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

Featured Reviews

HarshBhardiya

SOC Engineer at Just Dial Limited

Reliable bot management with valuable traffic analytics and good delivery configuration

We are using Akamai Ion primarily for CDN services. It is more about delivery configuration, and for security, we use Akamai WAF security controls and Botman Akamai Ion helps protect us from DOS, SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and scraping tools. Real-time analytics are very helpful for…

Read full review

Richard Polyak

Sr. Architect at NBC Universal

Easy to set up and has good integration into the host environment but needs better third party integration

I'm not sure which version number we are on. It's one of the latest, I assume. We don't run the latest. We usually are either one or two versions behind. It is something we are exploring. We do have use cases and it will compete against our existing product line. That would have to go in the second half of this year. Right now, it's more of a comparison of how we use it right now. We don't use it really in production. We are going to definitely explore it and do our comparison and more in-depth analysis of the product and compare it against our existing product line. I'd advise potential users to do a very in-depth analysis of the products in comparison. And don't just look at the cover of it - really look into the detailed backend support infrastructure and if it can be implemented the way you need it to be. I'd rate the solution five out of ten. It's not a fully mature product.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is bot management."

"Akamai is easy to use and very effective."

"What's most valuable in Avi Networks Software Load Balancer is its deployment capability, the ability to deploy in a dispersed service, with the service engines that can disperse and have a single control plane that can control the load balancing services across any available platform, wherever needed. The analytics of Avi Networks Software Load Balancer and flexibility of deployment are its most valuable features and the reasons why many people buy it."

"The most valuable feature of the solution for my organization is its UI since it allows us to see the clusters while providing a very specific and good overall understanding."

"The interface and software features are the most valuable aspects of this solution."

"The solution is stable."

"The WAF - the web application firewall itself - is great."

"Its visibility and login mechanism are the best parts. In addition to the great visibility it has a great dashboard and an easy to configure graphic user interface, a beautiful GUI."

"The friendly user interface is valuable."

"The solution has simplified our network infrastructure management."

Cons

"The product must provide more flexibility."

"Log management should display data for more than two months."

"IDS and IPS sites need to be more progressive."

"The network analytics and monitoring features are not effective."

"The initial setup is a bit complex."

"Avi Networks Software Load Balancer needs to improve its documentation."

"In terms of improvement, the pricing and documentation need improvement. We have had problems getting the documents."

"One struggle with Avi Networks Software Load Balancer is its integration with other VMware products. Integration could be improved in the solution so that you have a more unified control plane with it and other data center security and networking products that VMware sells. There has been a bit of a lag on the roadmap of new features that have come out there recently, but better interoperability with the hyperscale environments such as the AWS, Azure, GCPs of the world, and simpler deployment and interoperability with those existing tools, are areas that are receiving attention and could use additional attention today. These are the areas for improvement in Avi Networks Software Load Balancer."

"I did not go with it because their APM module is a different product altogether. It's a common thing that companies do. They sell something and then they add on top of it as a different product. It is a type of marketing strategy. But when it comes to the overall management, it takes a lot of time to really look into it."

"It doesn't match the development structure or user community of our existing product. It pales in comparison to that."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is expensive."

"The licensing costs for Avi Networks Software Load Balancer are really variable. The product can be sold from a bandwidth utilization perspective. It can be sold from a per CPU perspective, depending on if you're looking at on-premises or hyperscale environments. Licensing costs vary quite a bit if you're familiar with the AWS Calculator, where you can see that it can widely vary per licensing model. On a scale of one to five, with one being not very good value for the money and five being great, I would rate the pricing for Avi Networks Software Load Balancer a five because its pricing is extremely competitive. Not all features are included with the license, for example, there's single licensing."

"With Avi Networks, you can buy a 10-Gig license and, if your primary data center goes down, in the flick of a switch you can move that license to your backup data center and it will generate the traffic... there are a lot of cost-effective measures."

"I rate the solution price a four to five on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high, since it is an affordable tool."

"The tool is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Akamai Ion?

Akamai is easy to use and very effective.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Akamai Ion?

The billing cycle is monthly, however, payment is done yearly. While expensive, it provides value for the services offered.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Akamai Ion?

Log management should display data for more than two months. The traffic report needs to be more flexible. The response time of technical support should be improved.

See all answers

What do you like most about Avi Networks Software Load Balancer?

The solution has simplified our network infrastructure management.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Avi Networks Software Load Balancer?

The tool is expensive. It is not cheap. The product must be cheaper.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Avi Networks Software Load Balancer?

The network analytics and monitoring features are not effective. The product does not provide deep troubleshooting features. The solution must provide public IP features. F5 provides such features.

See all answers

Comparisons

NetScaler vs Akamai Ion

Compared 69% of the time

NGINX Plus vs Akamai Ion

Compared 31% of the time

More Akamai Ion Competitors

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer

Compared 32% of the time

NetScaler vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer

Compared 26% of the time

HAProxy vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer

Compared 11% of the time

NGINX Plus vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer

Compared 10% of the time

Kemp LoadMaster vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer

Compared 7% of the time

More VMWare Avi Load Balancer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

April 2025

Download Akamai Ion product report

Buyer's Guide

VMWare Avi Load Balancer

April 2025

Download VMWare Avi Load Balancer product report

Also Known As

No data available

Avi Software Load Balancer

Overview

Ion, Akamai’s flagship performance solution, is a suite of intelligent performance optimizations and controls that helps deliver superior web, iOS, and Android app experiences. Built on the SLA-backed availability of the globally distributed Akamai Intelligent Edge Platform, Ion continuously monitors real user behavior — applying best-practice performance optimizations automatically — and adapting in real time to content, user behavior, and connectivity changes.

Akamai

Avi Networks Software Load Balancer is an application delivery controller (ADC) platform. The solution provides scalable application delivery across any infrastructure and allows your organization to deliver multi-cloud application services, such as load balancing, autoscaling, application security, container networking, and web application firewall. It is designed with 100% software load balancing to ensure a fast and secure application experience. Additionally, Avi Networks Software Load Balancer offers elasticity and delivers intelligence across any environment.

The Avi Networks Software Load Balancer is unique because

It can scale from 0 to 1 million SSL transactions per second in minutes.
It can achieve 90% faster provisioning and 50% lower TCO than a traditional appliance-based approach.

Avi Networks Software Load Balancer Product Highlights

Troubleshoots application issues in less than a minute.
Alerts you of potential risks with SSL certificates and TLS versions used.
End-to-end timing for each transaction to help solve end-user experience issues.

Avi Networks Software Load Balancer Features

Avi Networks Software Load Balancer has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Automated application delivery
Seamless integration with the CI/CD
Built-in analytics
End-to-end visibility
Actionable insights
Security
“Network DVR”-like capability to record and replay specific transactions
Google-like search filters transactions based on device, location, errors, etc.

Avi Networks Software Load Balancer Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Avi Networks Software Load Balancer. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Multi-cloud application services: Avi Networks Software Load Balancer provides consistent, enterprise-grade application services, including load balancing, WAF, and container networking across heterogeneous environments. The multi-cloud application services can be deployed on bare metal, VMs, or containers in any data center or public cloud environments.

Faster application provisioning: With this solution, you gain automation with 100% REST APIs and self-service like public cloud.

Better business decisions: Avi Networks Software Load Balancer uses analytics to deliver application insights and help you drive more intelligent decisions.

Containerized applications: Avi Networks Software Load Balancer is a proven solution to deploy container-based workloads in production environments using Kubernetes/OpenShift/Tanzu clusters. It includes multi-cluster, multi-site support for containerized applications.

Lower TCO: The solution is 100% software, and does not require any proprietary hardware. In addition, because it offers on-demand autoscaling, there is no over-provisioning. Lastly, point-and-click application troubleshooting means there is no need for a black box.

Software-defined architecture: Avi Networks Software Load Balancer is designed with a software-defined architecture with a centralized control plane (Avi Controller) and distributed data plane (Avi Service Engine). Because of this, elastic autoscaling is made easy.

Better end-user visibility: The solution gives you granular visibility into end-user experiences and server response in real time. It also empowers application owners with end-user stats to optimize and improve apps.

Application health score: Avi Networks Software Load Balancer summarizes analytics information into a helpful health score that provides a quick snapshot of the overall applications. The health score it provides is determined by server response time, resource usage, anomalous traffic, and security posture.

VMware

Sample Customers

Eurail, Boston Scientific

Palo Alto Networks, DGDean, Swisslos

Buyer's Guide

Akamai Ion vs. VMWare Avi Load Balancer

April 2025

Free Report: Akamai Ion vs. VMWare Avi Load Balancer

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai Ion vs. VMWare Avi Load Balancer and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akamai Ion vs. VMWare Avi Load Balancer report.

See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.