Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

A10 Networks Thunder ADC is stable and reliable without requiring frequent tech support.
The Deterministic CGNAT feature is invaluable.
It effectively mitigates DDoS attacks through configurable rate limiting.
The active-passive setup allows seamless application migration without interruption.
It improves visibility and control over SSL management and server access.

CONS

A10 Networks Thunder ADC's virtualized version lacks scalability.
Support could be improved, particularly in first call resolution for urgent issues.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC requires enhanced cloud support and high-availability functions.
There is a need for better documentation, especially user scenarios and feature details.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC is considered expensive with high costs.
 

A10 Networks Thunder ADC Pros review quotes

it_user848256 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Network Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Apr 1, 2018
The Deterministic CGNAT feature is valuable for us.
it_user626721 - PeerSpot reviewer
Security Consultant & IT Professional at Sistemas Aplicativos, SISAP
Jan 23, 2019
For the past two and a half years, we have not had a need to open a tech support ticket. It is really stable. In the past, our experience with tech support was that they were extremely helpful.
SS
Network Manager at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
Aug 12, 2019
Being a public entity and having a public website which is highly visible with a lot of traffic, we are a target for DDoS. Within the last year, we have had a couple of DDoS attacks which could have affected our web traffic and taken down certain parts of our website. This did not happen because the A10 was able to mitigate the attacks using rate limiting that can be configured for DDoS mitigation on the box.
Learn what your peers think about A10 Networks Thunder ADC. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2025.
879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.
HR
IT Head at Medi Assist
Aug 30, 2019
A10 explained why the latency dropped significantly on a site that we have.
reviewer1178103 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Network Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Aug 30, 2019
The Global Server Load Balancing (GSLB) is simple to use.
AM
Network Analyst at Alamo Colleges
Sep 5, 2019
We have two appliances and I'm able to move my application from one appliance to another. I don't have to move my whole A10 to be active on the other side or to be passive on the other side. If an application is having a problem, I can just move it using a command.
reviewer1202652 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Specialist at a university with 10,001+ employees
Oct 7, 2019
The ease of use is very good. It's very robust. It just sits and works.
it_user1149558 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Architect at a retailer with 201-500 employees
Dec 19, 2019
Compared to F5, which I used about six years ago, the A10 is much easier when routing. You don't have to use the wildcard bits to route it between the different segments. It's much less troublesome to configure.
reviewer1297431 - PeerSpot reviewer
VP, Web Services and Cyber Security at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Feb 26, 2020
The SLB and GSLB load balancing are the most valuable features. They meet our need to do server-side load balancing and global site load balancing so we can distribute traffic, not only intra-data center, but inter-data center.
reviewer1333356 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Engineer IV at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Apr 19, 2020
The ADCs are pretty straightforward and easy to use. There is a GUI base where you can go in and see everything, but they also have a CLI base where you can use a command and get the information that you want, very fast.
 

A10 Networks Thunder ADC Cons review quotes

it_user848256 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Network Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Apr 1, 2018
It scaled well for our numbers, up to 3 million subscribers for our most crowded region but I would like to see the same scalability numbers for the virtualized version as well.
it_user626721 - PeerSpot reviewer
Security Consultant & IT Professional at Sistemas Aplicativos, SISAP
Jan 23, 2019
The setup depends on certain situations. In certain scenarios, it may be more complex than others. For example, while the initial configuration may be easy, the environment itself may be complex and that may limit the ease of deployment. It is easy for those who understand their environment.
SS
Network Manager at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
Aug 12, 2019
When it comes to support, there is always room for improvement. First call resolution is not always there for urgent issues. The first call resolution is something that could be improved upon.
Learn what your peers think about A10 Networks Thunder ADC. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2025.
879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.
HR
IT Head at Medi Assist
Aug 30, 2019
I would like them to provide learning tips and a community forum where users can share ideas. They need more detailed support articles on the A10 website.
reviewer1178103 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Network Engineer at a recreational facilities/services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Aug 30, 2019
Traffic flow issues are very difficult, as there's no means for us to analyze the traffic coming in or out of the appliance without technical support.
AM
Network Analyst at Alamo Colleges
Sep 5, 2019
The solution does logging, but the logging capacity is really small. Because we have a bunch of traffic here, we usually get a logging-side warning that "This many logs were lost because of the heavy traffic." If the logging was better, that would be very good.
reviewer1202652 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Specialist at a university with 10,001+ employees
Oct 7, 2019
The user interface is what people complain about most of the time, particularly if they don't use it very often. Then they complain that it's a bit clunky.
it_user1149558 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Architect at a retailer with 201-500 employees
Dec 19, 2019
There is room for improvement in the GUI. I just migrated from the 2.7 software train to the 4.1, and there are still people on 2.7. The latter is a very old GUI if you compare it to F5. It's not as easy to use and a lot of things are missing. They've made a lot of improvements in the 4.1 step, but compared to the ease of use of F5, it's still quite difficult. For people who haven't got a lot of experience, the GUI can be quite challenging.
reviewer1297431 - PeerSpot reviewer
VP, Web Services and Cyber Security at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Feb 26, 2020
In my opinion, they need to improve their cloud support. There is support for cloud, but not all functions are there, such as high-availability.
reviewer1333356 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Engineer IV at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Apr 19, 2020
There is room for improvement in the upgrading process. Sometimes we have to contact A10 for verification of some stuff.