Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

What is Rally Software?

Featured Rally Software reviews

Rally Software mindshare

Product category:
As of August 2025, the mindshare of Rally Software in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category stands at 6.1%, down from 6.6% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Rally Software6.1%
Jira20.0%
Microsoft Azure DevOps14.9%
Other59.0%
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

PeerResearch reports based on Rally Software reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Lifecycle Management (ALM) SuitesAug 28, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 28, 2025Download
ComparisonRally Software vs JiraAug 28, 2025Download
ComparisonRally Software vs Microsoft Azure DevOpsAug 28, 2025Download
ComparisonRally Software vs Polarion ALMAug 28, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
GitLab4.2N/A97%85 interviewsAdd to research
Microsoft Azure DevOps4.114.9%95%135 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise83
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business140
Midsize Enterprise80
Large Enterprise546
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Insurance Company
10%
Healthcare Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Government
5%
Energy/Utilities Company
4%
Transportation Company
4%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Retailer
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Construction Company
2%
Comms Service Provider
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Media Company
2%
University
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Engineering Company
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Wellness & Fitness Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
 
Rally Software Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Agile CSM - Sr. Scrum Master at Alliant Energy Corporation4.0I've witnessed how Rally Software enhances our workflow, aligning with Agile SAFe developments and customer needs. Its tight integration, particularly in dependency mapping and documentation, surpasses Jira, though it's expensive. Transitioning wasn't my choice; my company already used Rally.
Delivery Manager at Ford Motor Company3.5I use Rally Software for development planning, enabling global team coordination and providing metrics for management visibility. While effective for agile projects, it has bugs and lacks proper control over task modifications. I prefer Microsoft Project for larger projects.
Dev Ops Engineer at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees3.5We use Rally Software for backlog and task management in Scrum and Kanban. It has valuable note-taking features, but tracking changes is challenging. Improvements needed include a tagging system and easier license management to enhance productivity and efficiency.
Software Engineering Manager at Biesse4.5I used Rally Software for agile processes in software and mechanical projects. It's user-friendly with features like a project tree and backlog page. However, migration can be challenging, especially integrating with Git platforms like GitLab and GitHub, which need improvement.
Agile Delivery Transformation at Transparent Change4.0I began using Rally Software, formerly RallyDev, in 2006 for business process automation. While initially complex, it offers valuable features like burn-down charts. It excels in project management compared to Jira but lacks visual workflow representation.
Sr Engineering Manager - Design Engineering at Baker Hughes4.0I find Rally Software effective for agile development and appreciate its features like resource scheduling and user stories. Though I previously used Jira, our company switched for broader reasons. While customization is desired, I have no improvement suggestions.
QA Engineer at Amadeus2.5I found Rally Software useful mainly for documenting manual test cases, but the interface and tool integration were complex. Reporting was insufficient for my needs as a QA, and Octane offered better customization and project analysis features.
Process and Agility Consultant at V.tal5.0No summary available