Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Qt Squish Logo

Qt Squish Reviews

Vendor: Qt Group
4.4 out of 5

What is Qt Squish?

Featured Qt Squish reviews

Qt Squish mindshare

As of January 2026, the mindshare of Qt Squish in the Test Automation Tools category stands at 3.0%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Qt Squish3.0%
Tricentis Tosca15.3%
OpenText Functional Testing7.1%
Other74.6%
Test Automation Tools

PeerResearch reports based on Qt Squish reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryTest Automation ToolsJan 8, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersJan 8, 2026Download
ComparisonQt Squish vs Tricentis ToscaJan 8, 2026Download
ComparisonQt Squish vs Katalon StudioJan 8, 2026Download
ComparisonQt Squish vs UiPath Test CloudJan 8, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Tricentis Tosca4.115.3%96%113 interviewsAdd to research
OpenText Functional Testing4.07.1%87%98 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business181
Midsize Enterprise87
Large Enterprise309
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
22%
Computer Software Company
13%
Healthcare Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Educational Organization
4%
Outsourcing Company
4%
Transportation Company
4%
University
3%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
3%
Government
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Performing Arts
3%
Legal Firm
2%
Insurance Company
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Retailer
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Construction Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Media Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Non Profit
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Engineering Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
 
Qt Squish Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Software Test Engineer at Infrabel4.0I use Qt Squish mainly for regression and automatic regression tests, focusing on GUI-related testing in Qt. While it supports java SWT, setting up different software versions is cumbersome and requires specific environment variables. Other teams are considering additional tools.
Software Test Engineer at Infrabel4.0I use Squish to control traffic in real-time. The virtual dashboard is a valuable feature, allowing me to view customer results at any time, although I believe the price could be improved. I switched from HP based on colleagues' recommendations.
Software Engineer at Ambu GmbH4.5We use Qt Squish for test automation in our embedded systems, offering valuable integration with Qt for UI tests. While effective, improvements are needed in the embedded environment and ease of upgrading, as integrating upgrades can be bothersome.
Test Automation Specialist at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0I use froglogic Squish for automatic software testing, particularly user interface testing. Its modular framework and platform independence are valuable, but it could improve basic functionalities like login procedures and multi-screen handling. Overall, it enhances testing adaptability across platforms.
Head - Solution Management Group at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.5.0I use froglogic Squish for GUI regression testing with Qt frameworks. It's seamless across Windows and Linux. Although it's strong in GUI testing, adding performance and penetration testing could enhance its value. A centralized dashboard is available for monitoring.
Quality Assurance Engineer at a computer software company with 201-500 employees4.0No summary available
QA at a tech company with 11-50 employees4.0I use Froglogic Squish for desktop UI testing and appreciate its user-friendly interface and capability to test Qt applications. While I miss Git integration for collaboration, I expect the tool to be valuable and yield a return on investment.
Software Solutions Engineer at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.5.0No summary available