Polarion Requirements Reviews

Polarion Requirements users report a flexible pricing model, which offers various licensing options tailored to user roles, making it cost-effective for teams. While some consider it pricey compared to alternatives like GitLab, its pricing aligns with similar solutions at around 50 to 68 euros per user as of 2021. Many appreciate the value it brings in streamlining complex product management. The one-time licensing cost is offset by ongoing maintenance fees.

• "I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."
• "The pricing model is flexible. You don't have to pay for the full functionalities. And it's a one-time investment for the licenses. You purchase what you need and then can work with that."
• "I believe the cost is subjective. It seems a bit pricey, but it depends on your perspective. To provide some context, I compared the prices with GitLab and Jira. Unfortunately, I couldn't find Jira's prices. However, GitLab costs around 40 euros, and DeepLab, which I recently discovered, also falls in a similar price range. I'm not sure about DeepLab's features or interface improvements, as they might have been implementing requirements management over the past six months. In contrast, Polarion costs around 50 to 60 euros based on the 2021 prices I have. While it may seem a bit expensive, it's worth considering whether the additional investment, perhaps around 68 euros per user, is justified. It might appear costly at first glance, but it's essential to acknowledge that it can greatly streamline your work processes."

Polarion Requirements customer service is responsive and knowledgeable. Many users report timely responses and effective support, although some mention delays and unresolved issues. The Siemens Help Desk is the central support but may experience wait times ranging from days to weeks. While some appreciate their proactive approach, others find room for improvement. License issues were noted, prompting users to work offline temporarily. Comparatively, it's often considered superior to Dassault systems' support.

Polarion Requirements is often regarded as scalable, handling varying user counts. Many cases report effective scaling, especially with added resources, though some experience limitations with performance issues. This tool reportedly functions well for large teams, supporting extensive users daily. Compared to competitors like Jira or PTC, its scalability is commonly rated positively. Some users opt for a cloud-based model for enhanced adaptability and cost-efficiency. Overall, it is deemed adaptable to medium-scale needs.

Polarion Requirements impresses with solid stability, though performance varies with work item volumes. Users experience timeouts when managing numerous objects. While some find it very stable and high performing, shared license issues affect others. Ratings fluctuate between seven to nine out of ten, indicating the need for enhancements in handling specific requirements. Many users have not encountered stability issues, yet a ceiling exists for optimal functionality with extensive workloads.