PTC Integrity Requirements Connector vs Polarion Requirements comparison

"The biggest improvement would be in the transparency we have now. We have very complex products. We make whole systems with difficult and diverse areas such as hardware, software, mechanical and printing, etc. To get the overview of all the requirements into a system, at that sizing, is the main advantage we have in the organization now."

"The solution is especially great for organizing folders effectively."

"I like the way this solution is structured."

"Its flexibility and APIs are the most valuable."

"In my opinion, Polarion Requirements' most beneficial feature is the ability to manage specifications within a work-like document that functions as a work item. Its collaboration features have worked very well and have been very useful. We can easily exchange information with the testing team, the business, and with DevOps."

"A valuable feature from my side would be the comparison corporization."

"The most beneficial features of Polarion Requirements for traceability include the traceability function and also the historical and matchmaking or cross-referencing, which was very good."

"I would say there is value in how powerful, configurable, and user-friendly it is."

"It is a stable solution...I rate the support a nine out of ten."

"The platform's review process for the documents could be better."

"The usability of the solution should also be improved."

"It is not a stable solution, as we had issues with shared licenses."

"The risk assessment functionality needs improvement, like FMEA risk management."

"The areas of Polarion Requirements that have room for improvement include usability, and the user interface, which was a little bit poor."

"Polarion Requirement needs to have a feature where we can track changes and compare documents. Currently, we do it manually."

"Integration can be a little tricky if you're not aware of basic computer science or programming language."

"One thing to consider is increased flexibility in terms of workflow configuration."

"The training material for PTC Integrity should be made a little bit easier or more useful for the user."

"I believe the cost is subjective. It seems a bit pricey, but it depends on your perspective. To provide some context, I compared the prices with GitLab and Jira. Unfortunately, I couldn't find Jira's prices. However, GitLab costs around 40 euros, and DeepLab, which I recently discovered, also falls in a similar price range. I'm not sure about DeepLab's features or interface improvements, as they might have been implementing requirements management over the past six months. In contrast, Polarion costs around 50 to 60 euros based on the 2021 prices I have. While it may seem a bit expensive, it's worth considering whether the additional investment, perhaps around 68 euros per user, is justified. It might appear costly at first glance, but it's essential to acknowledge that it can greatly streamline your work processes."

"Polarion Requirements is a little pricey."

"I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."

"The product's price is high."

"It is expensive but not for what it is. It is just the right price for what it is. Its price is also similar to other solutions."

"The pricing model is flexible. You don't have to pay for the full functionalities. And it's a one-time investment for the licenses. You purchase what you need and then can work with that."