Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs Polarion Requirements comparison

Broadcom and Siemens are both solutions in the Application Requirements Management category. Broadcom is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0, while Siemens is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.9. Broadcom holds a 0.8% mindshare in ARM, compared to Siemens’s 14.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 78% of Siemens users who would recommend it.

Broadcom Agile Requirements...

Read 21 Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer reviews

645 Views
168 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Polarion Requirements

Read 14 Polarion Requirements reviews

2,441 Views
2,441 Comparison Views

78% willing to recommend

Broadcom Agile Requirements...

Polarion Requirements

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Polarion Requirements and Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer are competing products in requirements management. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer seems to hold an upper hand, largely due to its feature set that justifies its cost.

Features: Polarion Requirements offers robust traceability and collaboration capabilities, supporting end-to-end traceability, real-time collaboration, and document-based work items. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer focuses on automation and speed, enabling quick test case generation with its model-based approach, enhancing productivity in agile settings. Both products serve different functionalities, with Polarion focusing on comprehensive requirements tracking and Broadcom emphasizing agile test management and automation.

Room for Improvement: Polarion Requirements could benefit from more intuitive user interface enhancements and expanded flexibility in API integrations. Additionally, improvements in customization options for complex workflows would be valuable. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer might improve by streamlining its initial setup process and refining data integration capabilities. Enhancements in global support adaptability could also be beneficial, addressing specific regional needs more efficiently.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Polarion Requirements provides flexible deployment options, adaptable to both on-premise and cloud preferences, with a reputation for responsive customer service aiding smooth integration. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer relies on cloud deployment, supporting rapid scaling and integration, appealing to agile environments focusing on fast-paced deployment cycles. Polarion might be more appealing to those needing traditional support models, whereas Broadcom suits environments seeking agility.

Pricing and ROI: Polarion Requirements is noted for cost-effectiveness, offering significant ROI with its comprehensive feature set at a competitive price. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer, although involving a higher initial investment, promises strong ROI through agility and automation features, balancing its cost over time. Decisions rest on immediate cost savings with Polarion versus long-term benefits offered by Broadcom's automation capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. Polarion Requirements Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. Polarion Requirements

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Agile Requirements...

Ranking in Application Requirements Management

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (8th), Test Design Automation (3rd)

Polarion Requirements

Ranking in Application Requirements Management

3rd

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Requirements Management category, the mindshare of Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Polarion Requirements is 14.4%, down from 15.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Requirements Management

Featured Reviews

Hosney Osman

Senior Operation Engineer at Vodafone

Integration capabilities enhance testing and workflow automation

I rate Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer as 8 out of 10. It will be very nice if Broadcom has questions or comments related to my review and can reach me via email to clarify something. I want to be a reference for Broadcom. I don't have any information regarding the visual modeling function specifically. I'm not dealing with modeling requirements or generating optimized test cases in Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer. Broadcom takes a lot of information from us as end-users, and they provide fixes within two to five days maximum. My team has raised many enhancement requests and discussed them with Broadcom, and they are adding some of these features to the product itself. I look forward to receiving an email regarding these reviews, and I can add anything later if I forgot something, earning some points for this contribution on the website.

Read full review

Effendy Mohamed

Principal Instrument and Control at Petronas

Positive impact on traceability while user interface and setup require improvement

The areas of Polarion Requirements that have room for improvement include usability, and the user interface, which was a little bit poor. The user configuration had some issues; you need to know all the details, so it's not really friendly for those who are not IT savvy. Someone who has a good IT background would be able to use it, but a regular person who just knows more or has always been dealing with Microsoft Word might find it difficult to use that system. Users need skills to work with this solution and also need to have some foundation of why those technical integrations and cross-referencing have to be done in such a way through systematization, which makes it difficult and not straightforward through the visibility of the user interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CA ARD has some beautiful features which I haven't found anywhere else. For example, when designing or creating our test cases and doing scenarios, we are able to restrict our flows. If we take a data link between two processes, we can actually restrict it, so that, in production, if our functionality breaks down, we can restrict that and all the flows related to it will be removed from the test data set."

"Integration with TDM, test data management tool, provides the ability to generate data or use identified (preset or parametrized) test data. It allows significant expansion of test coverage and flexibility, without creating new tests and needing to maintain them."

"It gives us an idea of creating the visual diagrams, which are quite easy to use. It is helpful in creating our business processes."

"Technical support is excellent. They provide solutions quickly for issues encountered."

"Measuring test coverage helps in one of the most challenging tasks. It has logic that can help to select the right set of scenarios and know what coverage it will provide."

"It helped us to move from manual testing to automation testing."

"The optimization technique helps in giving us the minimum number of test cases with maximum coverage."

"The ability to create models/diagrams at multiple levels (nest/embed them) helps in taking models from high-level business requirements and building them into detailed requirements models and test models. Plus, it helps reuse lower level models. It also allows maintaining models at appropriate levels, even for very complex systems/solutions."

More Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer pros

"I would say there is value in how powerful, configurable, and user-friendly it is."

"It is easier to produce documents using the platform."

"The biggest improvement would be in the transparency we have now. We have very complex products. We make whole systems with difficult and diverse areas such as hardware, software, mechanical and printing, etc. To get the overview of all the requirements into a system, at that sizing, is the main advantage we have in the organization now."

"We worked with the web interface."

"The most beneficial features of Polarion Requirements for traceability include the traceability function and also the historical and matchmaking or cross-referencing, which was very good."

"My company mainly utilizes the product for documenting internal standards, guidelines, and requirements. Currently, we're focusing on using it for internal purposes, but the vision is to expand its usage to include contract requirements and tracking functionalities. While we're not there yet, it has proven effective for managing our internal documentation needs."

"In my opinion, Polarion Requirements' most beneficial feature is the ability to manage specifications within a work-like document that functions as a work item. Its collaboration features have worked very well and have been very useful. We can easily exchange information with the testing team, the business, and with DevOps."

"Its flexibility and APIs are the most valuable."

More Polarion Requirements pros

Cons

"It would help if it would save different subsets of test cases, use cases, etc., of a given diagram, for different purposes and provide an easy way to name those subsets."

"The solution could be more user-friendly. For example, attachments could be icon-based to make it easier for the user to notice them."

"The solution could improve security and authentication."

"Needs improvement in aligning models so they look clear and readable without having to move boxes around."

"It is not scalable anymore. It's not scalable because it doesn't support Kubernetes for making scalability, so I'm just going to increase memory and storage on the same machine."

"A template in App Test should be created in advance. This has proven to be time consuming. The process is not fully automated, because there is a lot of manual intervention is required."

"Data flexibility is something which I would like to see, along with more integration with App Test."

"I think it's already coming, but it needs more automation aspects. There is a tab for Automation, but I think it's not robust. I think that it's going to be a crucial element of the tool."

More Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer cons

"In my opinion, the main area for improvement in Polarion Requirements is its user interface. It should be easier for engineers to understand how it works, as many features are not very easily understandable for end-users."

"If we have more than one thousand work items in one live-book then it becomes almost unusable."

"Polarion Requirement needs to have a feature where we can track changes and compare documents. Currently, we do it manually."

"The areas of Polarion Requirements that have room for improvement include usability, and the user interface, which was a little bit poor."

"One thing to consider is increased flexibility in terms of workflow configuration."

"It is stable enough but if you would like to work with more requirement objects, then you will get timeouts."

"Integration can be a little tricky if you're not aware of basic computer science or programming language."

"Its user interface could be more user friendly. In addition, a lot of features are missing for test management. It should have the test case ordering feature."

More Polarion Requirements cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"At present, Broadcom works through partners rather than dealing directly with the consumer. When there are discounts given, it's up to the partner as to whether they want to give that discount to the customer. Sometimes, the partners decide to take the discount themselves. Pricewise, I would give ARD's price a rating of three out of five."

"It is less costly when compared to other tools on the market."

"The pricing model is based on how many people are using it. We have an annual license. There are not any additional costs."

"Recommendation is to go with concurrent licenses as oppose to seat license; this gives more flexibility."

"The cost of the tool was well worth the benefit that we saw on the back-end."

"This tool reduces the cost associated with test cases, automation script generation, and maintenance costs."

"We were able to scale down some resources to basically self-fund our ability to purchase the tool."

"Polarion Requirements is a little pricey."

"I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."

"The pricing model is flexible. You don't have to pay for the full functionalities. And it's a one-time investment for the licenses. You purchase what you need and then can work with that."

"It is expensive but not for what it is. It is just the right price for what it is. Its price is also similar to other solutions."

"The product's price is high."

"I believe the cost is subjective. It seems a bit pricey, but it depends on your perspective. To provide some context, I compared the prices with GitLab and Jira. Unfortunately, I couldn't find Jira's prices. However, GitLab costs around 40 euros, and DeepLab, which I recently discovered, also falls in a similar price range. I'm not sure about DeepLab's features or interface improvements, as they might have been implementing requirements management over the past six months. In contrast, Polarion costs around 50 to 60 euros based on the 2021 prices I have. While it may seem a bit expensive, it's worth considering whether the additional investment, perhaps around 68 euros per user, is justified. It might appear costly at first glance, but it's essential to acknowledge that it can greatly streamline your work processes."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Energy/Utilities Company

27%

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

30%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer?

It's not affordable; it's very expensive. It would be suitable only for large customers, and a large customer will think twice before making a deal with Broadcom.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer?

Integration with AI is an area that needs to be improved quickly. To be clear, this relates to how to use AI to improve use cases, break down applications, and review designs, as this area needs to...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer?

This solution saves a lot of time in the software testing cycle because, with Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer specifically, I am doing a flowchart, and I can extract test cases and use cases t...

See all answers

What do you like most about Polarion Requirements?

In my opinion, Polarion Requirements' most beneficial feature is the ability to manage specifications within a work-like document that functions as a work item. Its collaboration features have work...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Polarion Requirements?

I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Polarion Requirements?

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM DOORS vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer

Compared 25% of the time

Blueprint Storyteller vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer

Compared 23% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer

Compared 17% of the time

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer

Compared 14% of the time

Jama Connect vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer

Compared 11% of the time

More Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Competitors

IBM DOORS vs Polarion Requirements

Compared 57% of the time

Jama Connect vs Polarion Requirements

Compared 18% of the time

Jira vs Polarion Requirements

Compared 10% of the time

IBM DOORS Next vs Polarion Requirements

Compared 10% of the time

Helix ALM vs Polarion Requirements

Compared 3% of the time

More Polarion Requirements Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer

August 2025

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer report

Download Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer product report

Buyer's Guide

Polarion Requirements

August 2025

Download Polarion Requirements product report

Also Known As

Grid Tools Agile Designer, CA ARD, CA Agile Requirements Designer

No data available

Overview

CA Agile Requirements Designer is an end-to-end requirements gathering, test automation and test case design tool which drastically reduces manual testing effort and enables organizations to deliver quality software to market earlier and at less cost. The optimal set of manual or automated tests can be derived automatically from requirements modeled as unambiguous flowcharts and are linked to the right data and expected results. These tests are updated automatically when the requirements change, allowing organizations to deliver quality software which reflects changing user needs.

Broadcom

Polarion REQUIREMENTS is designed from the ground for highly effective, transparent and secure collaboration, while teams have the option to work in their familiar environments.

Siemens

Sample Customers

Williams, Rabobank

NetSuite, Ottobock, Zumtobel Group, Kªster Automotive GmbH, Sirona Dental Systems, LifeWatch, U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), PHOENIX CONTACT Electronics GmbH, Metso Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. Polarion Requirements

July 2025

Free Report: Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. Polarion Requirements

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. Polarion Requirements and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. Polarion Requirements report.

See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.