OPNsense is widely used for firewall functionalities, intrusion detection, VPN and IPSec, content filtering, securing network traffic, and remote access. It protects internal networks and manages servers securely, suitable for small to medium-sized businesses.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
OPNsense | 11.1% |
Fortinet FortiGate | 20.1% |
Netgate pfSense | 11.1% |
Other | 57.699999999999996% |
Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fortinet FortiGate | 4.2 | 20.1% | 91% | 411 interviewsAdd to research |
Netgate pfSense | 4.3 | 11.1% | 93% | 217 interviewsAdd to research |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 26 |
Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
Large Enterprise | 7 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 1330 |
Midsize Enterprise | 687 |
Large Enterprise | 1381 |
OPNsense is a comprehensive firewall solution leveraging open-source technology. It integrates with third-party modules like WireGuard and CrowdSec, enhancing its security capabilities. Offering on-premises and cloud deployment, it features an intuitive graphical interface, advanced reporting, VPN functionality, IDS/IPS features, and high scalability. Users find it ideal for small businesses and home networks due to its stability and ease of use. Frequent updates and an active community support its continuous improvement. However, it needs advancements in VPN selection, scalability, and technical documentation. Enhanced high availability, threat intelligence, and integration with virtualization platforms are required. User feedback suggests improvements in connectivity, alerting, traffic monitoring, and antivirus protection.
What are the key features of OPNsense?OPNsense is implemented across various industries to secure network infrastructure and ensure reliable connectivity. In fintech, it safeguards sensitive financial data while maintaining compliance. Educational institutions deploy it to protect student information and enable secure remote learning environments. Healthcare organizations use it to secure patient data and comply with HIPAA regulations. By integrating with tools like WireGuard and CrowdSec, businesses enhance their cybersecurity posture and streamline network management, making OPNsense a versatile choice for diverse operational needs.
1. Deciso B.V.
2. iXsystems, Inc.
3. EuroBSDCon
4. Netgate
5. Claranet
6. Voleatech
7. Open Systems AG
8. Securebit AG
9. Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH
10. AVM Computersysteme Vertriebs GmbH
Additional customers include: T-Systems International GmbH, Deutsche Telekom AG, Vodafone GmbH, 1&1 IONOS SE, OVHcloud, Hetzner Online GmbH, Strato AG, PlusServer GmbH, Host Europe GmbH, United Internet AG, 1&1 Versatel Deutschland GmbH, QSC AG, Bechtle AG, Cancom SE, Computacenter AG & Co. oHG, T-Systems Multimedia Solutions GmbH, Atos SE, Capgemini SE, Accenture plc, IBM Corporation, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Cisco Systems, Inc.
Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
---|---|---|
Administrator at a retailer with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I've used OPNsense as my home firewall for two years, primarily valuing its VLAN support for network isolation. It's stable, scalable, and free, though initial setup was tricky and better official setup guidance would help. |
Senior Client Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.5 | I am a Sales Engineer using OPNsense for demos on the road due to its ease of use, stability, and features like Zenarmor and Tailscale. Although Grafana integrations could improve, it offers significant operational benefits over Check Point and FortiNet. |
Senior IT Infrastructure Engineer at a real estate/law firm with 11-50 employees | 4.0 | I use OPNsense on-premises mainly as a firewall. It's stable, scalable, open source, and cost-effective, helping cut expenses while improving security, though its UI needs improvement compared to alternatives like Sophos. |
ISO 27001 Lead Implementer at a consultancy with 11-50 employees | 4.5 | I used OPNsense for my capstone project and home network due to its rich features, reliability, and cost-effectiveness; while it performs well, clearer documentation would improve usability, especially for new users like students. |
Senior Network Engineer at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees | 4.0 | I primarily use OPNsense for network security, appreciating its reliable firewall and GeoIP features. It's stable and easy to upgrade. However, improvements are needed for handling large voice and data traffic. Compared to FortiGate, I find OPNsense more user-friendly. |
Owner at Networks srl | 4.0 | I rely on OPNsense for its strong network intrusion detection and prevention capabilities, though its APIs need more development for better threat automation. It improved our threat response time significantly compared to our previous use of Cisco ASA 5505. |
System and Network Administrator at El Sadat City Language School | 3.5 | I use OPNsense primarily for managing security and network traffic. Its DNS filtering and VPN functionality are valuable, but the interface and bundle management need improvement. Supporting additional virtualization platforms would enhance its usability for larger companies. |
IT Manager at Pride in Azure | 4.0 | I find OPNsense's Dual WAN feature highly valuable for its advanced capabilities and cost-effective communication. I appreciate its security aspects but would like better documentation and community support for the free edition, especially for home users. |