Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Logo

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Reviews

Vendor: OpenText
4.2 out of 5
Badge Leader

What is OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)?

Featured OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) reviews

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) mindshare

Product category:
As of August 2025, the mindshare of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) in the Performance Testing Tools category stands at 5.8%, down from 6.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Performance Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)5.8%
Apache JMeter19.1%
Tricentis NeoLoad15.7%
Other59.4%
Performance Testing Tools

PeerResearch reports based on OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryPerformance Testing ToolsAug 27, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Apache JMeterAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs BlazeMeterAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Tricentis NeoLoadAug 27, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Apache JMeter3.919.1%87%94 interviewsAdd to research
Tricentis NeoLoad4.115.7%95%66 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise58
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business124
Midsize Enterprise35
Large Enterprise240
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
Retailer
6%
Insurance Company
5%
Healthcare Company
4%
Performing Arts
4%
Media Company
3%
Transportation Company
3%
Educational Organization
3%
University
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Comms Service Provider
2%
Non Profit
1%
Construction Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Sports Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%

Compare OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) with alternative products

Learn more about OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) customers

Related questions

Product Categories

Popular Comparisons

 
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Test Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees4.0I've used LoadRunner across various domains like banking, insurance, and healthcare. It provides user-friendly scripting and comprehensive reports but is costly. I've also used RPT and JMeter, with JMeter preferred for smaller projects due to its free cost.
Founder & Chief Executive Officer at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees4.0I've used LoadRunner Enterprise since the early 2000s; it's a stable, scalable, and versatile performance testing tool with easy scripting and broad platform support, though its analytics and reporting could benefit from modern AI enhancements.
Chief Executive Officer at iqst5.0I use OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise for comprehensive performance testing across various domains. Its runtime settings and real-time analysis are valuable, though resource optimization is needed. Despite its cost, it offers a strong ROI by preventing system failures.
Senior systems engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees4.0We use OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise for testing our e-commerce website's APIs and frontend, finding it efficient for executing tests and analyzing results. While there's reduced scripting time compared to JMeter, recording issues and support could be improved.
Senior Performace Engineer at Yolandi,miller@multichoice.co.za4.0I use OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise for performance testing our applications, valuing its reporting and real-time monitoring. It's user-friendly but scripting demands coding skills. TruClient is memory-intensive, posing challenges. I've only used LoadRunner, without integrating other tools.
Lead solutions architect at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees5.0My team leverages OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise for automated testing, ensuring efficient test coverage and performance evaluation. Its integration into OpenText's suite facilitates faster deployment and valuable synergy, aiding in problem identification and providing significant time and cost savings.
System administrator at Costco Wholesale3.5I use OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise for performance and load testing in e-commerce applications, implementing features like shift-left and DevWeb. Improvements are needed in data reporting and visual feedback. Preventing system failures is crucial for our revenue.
Advisor at Fiserv4.5We are in banking and use OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise for our desktop application with complex .NET protocols and encryption. Its best features are scripting and debugging, although debugging could benefit from graphs. Switching from JMeter improved encryption testing.