Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
No Magic MagicDraw Logo

No Magic MagicDraw Reviews

4.2 out of 5

What is No Magic MagicDraw?

Featured No Magic MagicDraw reviews

No Magic MagicDraw mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of No Magic MagicDraw in the Business Process Design category stands at 2.6%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Design Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
No Magic MagicDraw2.6%
Visio9.9%
Bizagi9.4%
Other78.1%
Business Process Design

PeerResearch reports based on No Magic MagicDraw reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryBusiness Process DesignMar 28, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 28, 2026Download
ComparisonNo Magic MagicDraw vs CamundaMar 28, 2026Download
ComparisonNo Magic MagicDraw vs VisioMar 28, 2026Download
ComparisonNo Magic MagicDraw vs BizagiMar 28, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Camunda4.18.7%89%78 interviewsAdd to research
Bizagi4.29.4%92%84 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business63
Midsize Enterprise57
Large Enterprise262
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
24%
Government
10%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
University
6%
Healthcare Company
4%
Comms Service Provider
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Non Profit
2%
Insurance Company
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Media Company
1%
Construction Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Retailer
1%
Photography Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Hospitality Company
1%

Compare No Magic MagicDraw with alternative products

Learn more about No Magic MagicDraw

No Magic MagicDraw customers

Related questions

 
No Magic MagicDraw Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
System Engineer at a consultancy with 51-200 employees4.0I've used No Magic MagicDraw for 25 years due to its ease of use, strong collaboration tools, and reliable support, though I wish the simulation toolkit was included by default to avoid licensing complications.
Systems Engineer at Marinha do Brasil (Oficial)4.5I used No Magic MagicDraw for modeling operations with ships and systems. Its valuable features include integration with tools like MATLAB. I found it more user-friendly and with better documentation compared to IBM Rational Rhapsody and Capella.
Engineer at a aerospace/defense firm with 5,001-10,000 employees4.5We are piloting a model-based engineering process using MagicDraw, valuing its excellent support and user-friendly service. However, the recommendation feature could improve as we occasionally struggle to find features and require assistance.
SCM Build/Release Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees3.5I use MagicDraw for modeling; it's versatile but often complicated. Its critical lack of modern C++ code engineering support, stuck at C++03, was a major limitation that ultimately forced my team to switch to Enterprise Architect.
Chief Refrigeration Product Development Division at Indurama4.5I used MagicDraw for structured refrigeration systems and appreciated its traceability feature, which provides a comprehensive view of project impacts. However, the outdated user interface, integration issues, and difficulty in finding skilled users were challenging.
Director at a engineering company with 11-50 employees4.0I use No Magic MagicDraw for system architecture and simulation, particularly valuing its simulation capabilities and interface. While the solution is effective, its pricing could be more competitive. I also use PTC Integrity and Eac for different purposes.
Director, Strategy and Consulting at a university with 5,001-10,000 employees3.5I use MagicDraw for MDSE, valuing its integration plugins and features. However, I find its documentation, UX, and ready-to-use patterns lacking, and the expensive licensing is a major detractor, making me recommend exploring alternatives.
Adjunct Professor at a university with 501-1,000 employees2.5I find this solution flexible for individual modeling, but it struggles with team collaboration. Usability issues exist, and ambiguities in the OMG standard significantly impact my experience, leading to my 5/10 rating.