Share your experience using Aruba Orchestrator

The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.

Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.

Your review helps others learn about this solution
The PeerSpot community is built upon trust and sharing with peers.
It's good for your career
In today's digital world, your review shows you have valuable expertise.
You can influence the market
Vendors read their reviews and make improvements based on your feedback.
Examples of the 84,000+ reviews on PeerSpot:

Dheni Prasetyo - PeerSpot reviewer
Network & Security Department Head at Hypernet Indonesia
Real User
Top 5
Helps businesses define network policies and access servers
Pros and Cons
  • "The most important feature is WAN optimization."
  • "The management menu should be simplified."

What is most valuable?

The main feature is WAN optimization. The Aruba Orchestrator helps businesses define their network policies and access to their servers and the Internet. This improves the quality of their connection. It offers great stability and policy.

It can simplify management by using an intent overlay. The zero charge provision is beneficial. It would only take about one hour to onboard a new device.

What needs improvement?

The management menu should be simplified.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Aruba Orchestrator for a year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The product is stable.

I rate the solution’s stability an eight to nine out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution’s scalability should be simplified. We now have two customers using it.

How are customer service and support?

Technical support is highly knowledgeable.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is complex because it's a new function. It has deployment templates. Once you set up the deployment, you can use it for any other file. We use the same template, so you can replicate the process and pass it on.

To deploy, first set up the Orchestrator, whether on-premises or cloud and include the license. Once you have the license, the Edge Connect devices will be directly connected, and you will approve them highly. Then, install the configuration using the deployment template. Furthermore, you need to proceed with changing the site by site. There are different parameters, such as LAN IP or other offerings. The deployment template is quite simplified.

What was our ROI?

Aruba is stable and connects its internal network to the Internet. The main functions of WAN optimization and the business overlay policy are reasonable.

What other advice do I have?

The conclusion is that WAN optimization, access center policy, and BIO should be the main features. Let's also examine the deployment using the template to replicate similar device characteristics easily. You have two options with Aruba Orchestrator for automation based on throughput and bandwidth usage. You can either add the boost item or change the device.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
Cloud Network Engineer at Pearl Technologies Ltd
Real User
Top 10
A value-for-money solution to reduce the WAN links cost
Pros and Cons
  • "Aruba Orchestrator has notably reduced enrollment setup times from several hours to within an hour if prepared and planned."
  • "The initial setup is complex, depending on the overall planning for the entire environment."

What is our primary use case?

Aruba Orchestrator helps us reduce the cost of the WAN links and size the solution for the beta management environment through orchestration. Additionally, we try to deliver application capabilities with the same user experience.

What is most valuable?

The heterogeneous solution combining WAN optimization and SD-WAN has significantly improved the environment. Aruba Orchestrator has notably reduced enrollment setup times from several hours to within an hour if prepared and planned.

What needs improvement?

There is room for improvement in both environments, such as Cisco SD-WAN and Aruba Orchestrator. LiveAction, a data analytics tool, gathers much information and provides reporting, making it preferable to Aruba's native analytics and licensing.

Many deployment scenarios can complicate insights and troubleshooting efforts. Therefore, complexity needs to be managed carefully.

From a security perspective, both environments are secure. Silver Peak offers third-party integrations like Zscaler for application delivery. Cisco provides both Zscaler and its native solution, Cisco Umbrella. Other third-party solutions like Netskope also exist, ensuring robust security features through integration capabilities.

There are practical challenges that customers encounter that should be addressed by the product team. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Aruba Orchestrator as a customer for four years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The product is stable.

I rate the solution’s stability a ten out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

3,000 users are using this solution.

I rate the solution’s scalability a ten out of ten.

How are customer service and support?

Documentation could be improved.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Compared to Cisco SD-WAN, it doesn't decouple the control plane from the data plane. Unlike Cisco SD-WAN, the Orchestrator manages the environment from a configuration standpoint but doesn't handle control information or push routing information to individual nodes.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is complex, depending on the overall planning for the entire environment. Setting up a single node doesn't take much time, typically no more than an hour. However, the entire deployment, including all nodes, heavily relies on planning and the leadership team's focus.

I rate the initial setup an eight out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The product has reasonable pricing.

What other advice do I have?

Hybrid environments and high-compute, high-storage setups prefer this solution over those with lower storage and higher computing performance or companies with cloud-agnostic approaches.

The sizing of the solution is crucial. If a customer prefers on-premises data centers over the cloud or opts for a hybrid solution combining on-premises and cloud resources, Silver Peak becomes an attractive option. The choice also depends on the application landscape and user usability requirements. Customers seeking optimized infrastructure costs can undoubtedly benefit from this solution.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate