Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Logo

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Reviews

Vendor: Kaspersky
3.9 out of 5

What is Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response?

Featured Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response reviews

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response mindshare

As of December 2025, the mindshare of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category stands at 1.0%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response1.0%
CrowdStrike Falcon9.4%
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint8.7%
Other80.9%
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

PeerResearch reports based on Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryEndpoint Detection and Response (EDR)Dec 30, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersDec 30, 2025Download
ComparisonKaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs CrowdStrike FalconDec 30, 2025Download
ComparisonKaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs Microsoft Defender for EndpointDec 30, 2025Download
ComparisonKaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs SentinelOne Singularity CompleteDec 30, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
CrowdStrike Falcon4.39.4%97%136 interviewsAdd to research
SentinelOne Singularity Complete4.45.3%97%203 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Nov 16, 2025

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise6
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business78
Midsize Enterprise59
Large Enterprise117
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Government
6%
Retailer
5%
Real Estate/Law Firm
5%
Educational Organization
5%
Healthcare Company
4%
Construction Company
4%
Wholesaler/Distributor
3%
Hospitality Company
3%
Outsourcing Company
3%
University
3%
Media Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Insurance Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Logistics Company
2%
Marketing Services Firm
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
International Affairs Institute
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Non Profit
1%
Agriculture
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Leisure / Travel Company
1%
Wellness & Fitness Company
1%

Compare Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response with alternative products

Learn more about Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response

Related questions

 
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
IT Manager at R K Khanna and Associates4.0I use Kaspersky EDR mainly as a firewall, and while it’s affordable and stable, it’s less effective and more resource-heavy than CrowdStrike, which I preferred but stopped using due to its high cost.
Manager Cyber Security Department at Mana3.0I've used Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for two years in threat hunting, finding its detection adequate but lacking features, scalability, and support compared to industry leaders like CrowdStrike and Trend Micro, making it unsuitable for long-term use.
Security Engineer at adcb4.0We prioritize Kaspersky for its effective detection and response features, particularly its sandbox environment for malware analysis. However, support needs improvement due to slow response times. We switched from CrowdStrike due to data privacy concerns and cost efficiency.
Head Information & Communication Technology at Uganda Finance Trust Ltd.4.0I use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for mobile devices and laptops, appreciating its reporting and malware detection features. However, its patch management needs improvement, prompting me to consider additional solutions like Sophos. Technical support response time could also improve.
IT Manager at Ducart4.0I find Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response easy to use with good protection that doesn't impact computer performance. However, there's room for enhancing security and performance. I previously didn't consider other solutions and have no preferred cloud provider.
IT Administrator at TGTC4.0I found Kaspersky EDR highly effective and customizable on-premises, but transitioning to the cloud caused severe compatibility issues, leading to high CPU usage and unresponsive systems. Despite its previous success, we switched to SentinelOne due to these cloud problems.
Head of Information Security at Faisal Islamic Bank of Egypt4.0I primarily use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for endpoints due to its high detection rate and valuable features like behavior detection and threat prevention. It could improve integration capabilities. Transitioning from Symantec was seamless, saving us about 70% in costs.
Network administrator at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees4.5I use Kaspersky on numerous servers and workstations, finding its IT management features valuable, though it lacks XDR capabilities. Our security improved significantly after transitioning from McAfee, though Cortex offers better security features.