Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Reviews

Kaspersky Endpoint provides multiple features. For example, it offers encryption, protection against targeted attacks, behavior and ML analysis, and multiple policies are available in Kaspersky. We recommend Kaspersky the most in Pakistan. Its advanced EDR features provide additional capabilities in endpoint security, including complete visibility of the quarantine system.

Kaspersky EDR gives complete path visibility of file location. It's allowed to contain the file in the same place. It does not spread the file to other locations or another system.

Kaspersky needs improvement in communication between the network and endpoint, as well as between endpoint and server. Sensors often fail to listen to the server due to communication issues resulting in multiple hurdles. Kaspersky needs to prioritize addressing this communication issue. While Kaspersky provides all the necessary functionality, there's room for improvement. Kaspersky should consider adding features to allow us to create use cases in the Sky console. If analytics don't detect anything in the Kaspersky console, the alerts must be configured in Kaspersky Sky so that they trigger when an attack is performed. This would make it easier for us to find any threats.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for two years.

The product is stable. Some issues with certain parts and connectivity are still unresolved.

We do not face any downtime. To update the license, we remove the previous license and apply the new one. If we fail to remove it, there's an option in Kaspersky called the reserve fee. You can add the reserve and use it to apply for the new license. Once the actual license expires, your reserve is automatically converted.

You need more licenses to install the new sensors. Once you receive the license, enter it into your console, and you can use multiple sensors according to your license.

When you purchase Kaspersky, you can choose to buy the ticketing solution, opt for proper support for the response service, or both options. Otherwise, the response time will be between four to eight hours.

Neutral

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response outperforms Symantec in several aspects. Unlike Symantec, Kaspersky offers a single console for managing both media and endpoints. Additionally, Kaspersky provides encryption features, whereas Symantec lacks encryption capabilities in its Endpoint solution. Kaspersky offers more visible and comprehensive features compared to other products.

The initial setup is easy and takes around one or two hours to complete. We have to download our packages.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

It allows me to selectively block certain websites for personal reasons, and I can control the usage of USB drives when connecting external devices to safeguard my computer. Additionally, I have the ability to manage other network devices for enhanced security.

It downloads essential security patches that are valuable for my PC. This is particularly useful as Windows doesn't always automatically update immediately.

Incorporating an AI protection tool with the capability to detect and prevent zero-day threats, particularly those with a five-star rating in terms of severity would be beneficial.

I have been working with it for six months.

It provides excellent stability.

The current scalability is insufficient for my needs on my PC. I personally manage HTTP, but it lacks the necessary capability. I believe an upgrade is required.

I previously utilized Sophos XDR, but I transitioned to Kaspersky as it offers a more cost-effective solution. I also used ESET, but it didn't meet my requirements.

The initial setup is straightforward and user-friendly.

The deployment process takes approximately thirty minutes.

In terms of return on investment, I saved money by protecting my laptops, as universal ransomware poses the most significant threat, and the chosen solution effectively mitigates this risk.

The pricing falls within the average range.

Overall, I would rate it eight out of ten.

We've deployed the client at the user’s end. We provide software security.

The advanced detection features are valuable. The solution provides reports on users and their devices. We get to know whether the devices are infected. The tool has saved us time and resources. Otherwise, we have to check every PC for viruses.

Many viruses change algorithms. The product does not detect zero-day threats. Kaspersky must provide zero-day threat detection. The product must provide a detailed status of the users and their activity on the devices.

I have been using the solution for more than a year.

The tool is stable.

We have 40 to 50 clients that use the solution.

The solution is deployed on my Windows Server 2019. The initial installation is easy.

The product is cheap.

My recommendation will depend on the number of users and the features other competitors offer. We are partners. Overall, I rate the tool a seven out of ten.

Kaspersky EDR has been beneficial for our organization, enhancing threat detection and response capabilities. It helps identify issues such as malware detection, unauthorized downloads, and inappropriate user permissions, enabling swift action to mitigate risks.

Kaspersky EDR offers automated response capabilities, enhancing efficiency by enabling quick investigation and response to potential threats on Android devices. It streamlines the process by automatically checking and responding to security issues, potentially improving effectiveness and reducing the need for manual intervention.

Kaspersky EDR could be improved by adding network detection capabilities to enhance convenience and security. Detecting and responding to network protocol issues, such as phishing emails or malicious downloads, can be challenging, but integrating network monitoring into EDR tools could significantly improve overall network security.

Overall, I'm satisfied with the price of Kaspersky EDR. It is widely used among our peers and has been effective in detecting and mitigating malware and ransomware threats. However, I have noticed that other EDR tools like Palo Alto EDR offer more advanced AI capabilities and broader threat coverage.

Kaspersky EDR enhances response capabilities by capturing malware or problematic websites on endpoints and providing alerts for quick action to resolve issues.

Kaspersky EDR offers features for threat hunting and vulnerability scanning on endpoints. It identifies unapplied security patches and provides a reporting tool for managing patch deployments efficiently.

Kaspersky EDR offers good integration capabilities, particularly with services like Office 365, which is beneficial for our organization. However, there might be some limitations when integrating with other tools such as NetSuite and Monday.com. Improving integration with tools like SolarWinds could enhance overall cybersecurity management. Looking ahead, prioritizing integration with cloud services would be advantageous as organizations increasingly rely on cloud-based solutions.

I would recommend Kaspersky EDR, especially for organizations operating in the China market. It is a convenient tool that provides effective security solutions, particularly helpful in addressing firewall issues commonly faced in the Chinese market. However, for companies outside of China not facing similar market restrictions, it might be good to consider other solutions as well.

Overall, I would rate Kaspersky EDR as a seven out of ten. It is a useful choice for our organization, although not perfect. It requires a certain skill set to manage security nodes effectively. However, it is relatively easy to use compared to other EDR tools, making it a safer option for less experienced users.

We use the solution to gather information on how endpoints behave and any events happening. If there's any suspicious activity on a machine, it alerts us. For investigating specific devices, we can refer back to the EDR.

The product is integrated with endpoint protection. We don't have to implement a separate technology. It provides visibility over the endpoints. 

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response needs vast resources on the central node. Not all maintenance tasks are in the GUI, so we often use commands. The lack of documentation for these processes means we frequently reach out to support, open tickets, and run complex CLI commands. It's not the most straightforward process. It should also improve stability. 

I have been working with the product for three years. 

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is scalable. We have two admins using it. 

Even when we raise a support ticket, the engineers often don't provide direct answers. We have to dig into R&D and experiment; getting a resolution for a support ticket takes time.

Neutral

The tool's deployment was straightforward. It took a week to deploy. 

The tool's pricing is reasonable. 

I rate the product a six out of ten. 

We use the solution to cover endpoint security.

We have a concept of working from home. Most endpoints are not in the domain. It is our first line of defense. While we had Kaspersky deployed, it gave good insight into the upcoming challenge or threat. Accordingly, the relevant teams come into action and take good care of it before it blows out of our hands. As a security audit, we ensure that the agents and the machines are in the early stages. It gives us appropriate information, which helps us to keep our environment in a better, safer, and controlled position.

My team was struggling with the reporting when we were doing an audit. The console features are a little more interactive and user-friendly. There's some issue, or maybe some fixing has to be done. I've seen the ground staff struggling a lot over there. The skill set, knowledge transfer, or training can help them to improve.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response as a customer for seven months, whereas my company has been using it for around three years.

The initial setup is not challenging.

The solution is expensive.

Our operation team has used Kaspersky. We are involved in it as a part of my cybersecurity or system audit.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I use the solution for protection and incident response. 

The tool's performance and prevention are amazing. 

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is expensive. It should improve its stability. 

I rate the solution's stability an eight out of ten. 

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response's installation is straightforward. For organizations with 1000 employees, deployment can take an hour to complete. To deploy the product, you must go to the management portal and push the agents. We rely on one resource to handle deployment and maintenance. It can be handled remotely. 

I rate the solution an eight out of ten.