Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
IBM FlashSystem Logo

IBM FlashSystem Reviews

Vendor: IBM
4.1 out of 5
Badge Leader

What is IBM FlashSystem?

Featured IBM FlashSystem reviews

IBM FlashSystem mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of IBM FlashSystem in the NAS category stands at 12.5%, down from 13.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
NAS Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
IBM FlashSystem12.5%
Dell PowerScale (Isilon)17.5%
Dell PowerStore12.2%
Other57.8%
NAS

PeerResearch reports based on IBM FlashSystem reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryNASAug 27, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonIBM FlashSystem vs Dell PowerStoreAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonIBM FlashSystem vs Dell PowerScale (Isilon)Aug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonIBM FlashSystem vs NetApp FAS SeriesAug 27, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Dell PowerStore4.312.2%96%120 interviewsAdd to research
Pure Storage FlashArray4.6N/A99%199 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business37
Midsize Enterprise19
Large Enterprise44
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business444
Midsize Enterprise244
Large Enterprise679
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Government
6%
Retailer
4%
Educational Organization
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Real Estate/Law Firm
4%
University
4%
Construction Company
3%
Wholesaler/Distributor
3%
Insurance Company
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Media Company
3%
Hospitality Company
3%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%

Compare IBM FlashSystem with alternative products

Learn more about IBM FlashSystem

IBM FlashSystem customers

Related questions

 
IBM FlashSystem Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Infrastructure Technical Specialist II at Clicks Group4.0I find IBM FlashSystem to be a competitively priced, reliable storage solution offering robust performance on demand. However, its deduplication technology requires improvement, especially compared to alternatives like NetApp. The return on investment is immediate, and the hardware is dependable.
Vice President Sales at BELOCAL LTD4.0I am working with IBM FlashSystem 5300, ideal for small companies with storage needs up to 16 terabytes. It is cost-effective but needs improvement in deduplication and compression. We also offer Hitachi and Dell for better performance and reliability.
Storage Specialist at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.5I use IBM FlashSystem for CRM, billing, and telecom industry tasks, along with code and case management systems, and some customers use SAP HANA. The performance and data reduction are impressive, though the GUI and volume deletion time could improve.
Manager, Technical Services, IBM Storage & Backup Solutions. at Thakral4.0I use IBM FlashSystem primarily in the banking industry for its flash copy mapping and built-in compression, despite challenges with troubleshooting and high licensing fees. Its scalability and support make it a preferred choice over Dell, Huawei, and HP.
Technical Lead at Tomia3.5I've used IBM FlashSystem for over seven years and found it reliable with good performance and reasonable pricing, though support response times need improvement. It's ideal for medium workloads, and we've seen a solid ROI after three years.
Storage Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees4.5My company uses IBM FlashSystem for hosting Oracle databases, and its replication feature is invaluable for our data management needs, though improvements in data reduction, three-site replication synchronization, and technical support response times are needed.
SENIOR SYSTEM ADMINISTRATOR at TOTAL SERVICE a.s.4.0I use IBM FlashSystem for customer data and backup due to its ease of updates and setup compared to previous Storwize experiences. Although the system works fine, its customization features need improvement. HPE remains a notable competitor.
Sr. Manager - System Analyst (Datacenter Infrastructure) at Sohar International3.5Our company utilizes IBM FlashSystem for robotic process and workflow automation, as well as document management. The storage system is straightforward with an easy-to-use GUI and tier replication capabilities, but lacks compression and deduplication, limiting memory and controller power.