Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
GitHub Actions Logo

GitHub Actions Reviews

Vendor: GitHub
4.2 out of 5
Badge Leader

What is GitHub Actions?

Featured GitHub Actions reviews

GitHub Actions mindshare

As of December 2025, the mindshare of GitHub Actions in the Build Automation category stands at 9.2%, down from 10.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Build Automation Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
GitHub Actions9.2%
GitLab10.6%
Tekton8.6%
Other71.6%
Build Automation

PeerResearch reports based on GitHub Actions reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryBuild AutomationDec 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonGitHub Actions vs GitLabDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonGitHub Actions vs TektonDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonGitHub Actions vs JenkinsDec 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
GitLab4.210.6%97%88 interviewsAdd to research
VMware Tanzu Platform4.01.8%100%23 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Nov 9, 2025

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise11
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business122
Midsize Enterprise55
Large Enterprise306
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
7%
University
5%
Healthcare Company
5%
Insurance Company
5%
Educational Organization
4%
Retailer
4%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
4%
Government
4%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Media Company
3%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Construction Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Performing Arts
1%
Non Profit
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%

Compare GitHub Actions with alternative products

Learn more about GitHub Actions

Related questions

 
GitHub Actions Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
DevOps Engineer at ENTERPRISE SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LIMITED4.0I've used GitHub Actions mainly for secure enterprise repository management, appreciating its automation workflows, though it still lacks some depth compared to Jenkins or Azure DevOps. Overall, it's reliable and scalable, and I’d rate it an eight.
Chief Technology Officer at Teslon Technologies Pvt Ltd4.0We use GitHub Actions for CI/CD pipelines to simplify code building and automate deployments. Its ease of use and integration with GitHub is beneficial, though we still rely on Jenkins for some tasks. It has boosted our efficiency by 20%.
Analytics Solution Manager at Credence Tech4.5I use GitHub Actions primarily for CI/CD in MLOps, especially for automating deployments and infrastructure, which saves time and effort, though the syntax takes learning and advanced security features are quite expensive.
Senior Software Developer at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees4.0Our primary use case for GitHub Actions is building and deploying applications while also managing resources and infrastructure. We value its scalability and feature set, although switching to self-hosted agents from platforms like Azure or AWS could be simpler.
Senior DevOps Engineer at Alibaba Group5.0No summary available
Senior Cloud Engineer - AWS at Bytedance4.0I use GitHub Actions for continuous integration and deployment, particularly with Kubernetes via Helm charts. Its seamless integration with GitHub reduces CI/CD workload significantly compared to Jenkins. However, deployment could improve by executing tasks incrementally, especially with AWS EKS clusters.
Software Engineer at Mercedes-Benz AG4.0I use GitHub Actions to commit code and create pipelines. It integrates seamlessly with third-party tools, enhancing software release speed and reliability. However, improving the feature that detects outdated libraries would make it more intuitive and informative.
Chief Software Engineer at Valeo4.0I mainly use GitHub Actions for our CI/CD processes, valuing its automation and seamless integration with GitHub, which simplifies the building process. However, I believe improving logging for debugging complex workflows would be beneficial.