CloudBees vs GitHub Actions comparison

CloudBees and GitHub are both solutions in the Build Automation category. CloudBees is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3, while GitHub is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.4. CloudBees holds a 1.7% mindshare in BA, compared to GitHub’s 10.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CloudBees users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

CloudBees

Read 20 CloudBees reviews

1,050 Views
840 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitHub Actions

Read 22 GitHub Actions reviews

2,938 Views
2,938 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CloudBees

GitHub Actions

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 10, 2025

CloudBees and GitHub Actions are both prominent tools in the CI/CD space. User reviews suggest that users are generally happier with GitHub Actions due to its integration with GitHub and ease of setup, whereas CloudBees is favored for its scalability and advanced security features.

Features: CloudBees offers scalability and advanced security features, making it well-suited for large enterprises. It supports high workloads and provides tools like pipeline release orchestration and application delivery automation. GitHub Actions provides seamless integration with GitHub, offering scalable and diverse automation features such as workflows and YAML-based configurations. Its integration with version control and ability to automate CI/CD pipelines are attractive features.

Room for Improvement: CloudBees faces challenges with speed, GUI intuitiveness, and plugin management issues. Users also express the need for better tracking of licenses and user activities. GitHub Actions could improve its error management, logging, and integration options with external tools. Users mention the need for more streamlined debugging and enhanced support for additional programming languages and project types.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloudBees provides deployment flexibility across various cloud environments and strong customer support, though some users note the need for improved support concerning plugin issues. GitHub Actions, primarily deployed in public clouds, receives mixed reviews on customer support efficiency and is noted for consistent challenges in resolving recurring issues.

Pricing and ROI: CloudBees, while not inexpensive, is valued for its enterprise support and advanced security features, leading to a positive ROI through automated deployments that save resources. GitHub Actions is cost-effective for basic use, offers free tiers, and generally requires payment for enterprise-level functionalities. Its pricing is considered reasonable, with the advantage of being open-source for individual users.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudBees vs. GitHub Actions Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CloudBees vs. GitHub Actions

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,089 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudBees

Ranking in Build Automation

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Configuration Management (11th), Value Stream Management Software (2nd), DevSecOps (4th), AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (2nd)

GitHub Actions

Ranking in Build Automation

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of CloudBees is 1.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub Actions is 10.0%, up from 9.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub Actions	10.0%
CloudBees	1.7%
Other	88.3%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

YashBrahmani

Senior Associate at BNP Paribas CIB

Offers a clear visualization and overview of workflows and helpful in managing CI/CD processes

Improvement in the sense that they can do better in terms of management of logs and stuff like that because the console logs are very extensive, and that causes a lot of storage issues. That is one of the things which is there. Also, with respect to the traditional platform and the modern platform, many things have upgraded, and it has quite improved. But when we talk about the performance of the agents, it’s still very crucial because it’s not up to par. It takes a lot of time to provision the agent and to finish the build because of the SSH connection and the JNLP connection. Due to that, sometimes the agent doesn’t get provisioned. Those are some of the blockers that meet up the time in terms of administering the instance.

Read full review

MuhammadAzhar Khan

Senior DevOps Engineer at Alibaba Group

Integration with various environments and cloud providers enhances automation

I use GitHub Actions for CI/CD pipelines. I automate infrastructure, deployment, and all processes. Most companies use CI/CD pipelines, and GitHub Actions is one of the tools available for this purpose The most valuable feature of GitHub Actions is that it is completely free. It can be integrated…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The customer support is good. You get good representatives from CloudBees to help you and understand your requirements."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its flexibility."

"CloudBees updates its features frequently, so if we need something like SSL login, they enable it."

"The most beneficial aspect is that CloudBees integrates with everything, like version one, GitHub, and PDM."

"One recent product feature that stands out is the pipeline explorer, which is providing significant value for us right now."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that its GUI is quite simple."

"The security audit product offered by CloudBees is particularly beneficial in automating audit processes, which reduces the time developers spend on audits."

"CloudBees operates seamlessly. Deploying to a cluster is straightforward—just one click, and the job is done."

More CloudBees pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a good product that offers stability and performance."

"It is a very stable solution as we have not faced any issues."

"I have optimized job execution time by running test scripts in parallel and creating multiple pipelines; we've significantly reduced execution times. What could take 50 minutes can be cut down to just 8 to 10 minutes through these optimizations."

"GitHub Actions is valuable for its ease of use and integration."

"I find the automation feature of GitHub Actions most valuable for our building processes. It integrates seamlessly with GitHub, so there's no extra configuration needed, making the building process easy and efficient. GitHub Actions handles scalability well, automatically managing execution infrastructure without requiring additional configurations. We haven't yet explored GitHub Actions' support for AI projects, as we haven't used its AI capabilities."

"GitHub Actions can be easily configured, especially for environment variables and secrets. The UI is understandable and user-friendly for setting up CI/CD pipelines. I prefer tools like GitLab, where the pipeline starts quickly and is accessible near the commits for easy access. However, many CI/CD tools are interchangeable due to similar features of GitHub Actions and other similar tools."

"It is user-friendly, with clear and organized processes, making it easy to navigate and work with."

"The level of automation achievable is really good. So, the custom workflow creation and Marketplace Actions improved our project's efficiency."

More GitHub Actions pros

Cons

"If you're logged in and working for about thirty minutes and then go idle for five to ten minutes, Jenkins will prompt you to re-authenticate."

"The setup is somewhat complicated. You need a cloud architect and engineer to set it up properly. The initial setup will take time, so you need a good engineer and architect to handle it."

"To use the tool, you need to be familiar with the tool itself and with how it will be incorporated into the culture."

"The problem with CloudBees is that when you merge it, the pipelines would randomly fail multiple times."

"To improve efficiency, they should focus on smoother label deployment."

"The user interface of CloudBees is good but could be even more intuitive. Improving the user-friendliness of the interface and having simpler setup configurations would greatly benefit new users."

"The platform could integrate better with other tools and support external tools directly."

"One challenge I'd like to highlight is that with CloudBees CI growing bigger and bigger, there are limitations in terms of managing old plugins and services and upgrading them with time."

More CloudBees cons

"The minor drawback of GitHub Actions is the management of the dashboard and pipeline runs, which needs improvement. The dashboard for running pipelines could be better."

"The primary area for improvement I see is in artifact management, especially for saving screenshots or videos from failed tests or data-driven actions. Currently, the configuration for saving these artifacts is complex."

"The solution's integration capabilities and UI are areas of concern where improvement is required to make the product more user-friendly."

"The UI could be better."

"The only issue I have faced is with authorization, particularly when configuring the GitHub token correctly."

"We can leverage this database tool to manage everything within our environment and data burners, allowing for customization and execution. An additional advantage is the capability to modify aspects like file size, making processes more efficient and faster across the pipelines. Regarding improvements or implementations, I believe there should be enhancements made to the deployment tool. It should be integrated as part of the solution. Infrastructure-wise, we already have tools like GitHub and RobSpot, and data enables us to automate various processes, which is quite beneficial. As for further enhancements, I'm uncertain. I've shared everything I know. However, if there's something specific you'd like to see in future releases, a feature that may not exist yet but would be desirable, I can't provide any input on that matter."

"GitHub Actions lacks a feature for automating the build process for mobile applications."

"In terms of improvements, I think better logging for debugging purposes would be helpful, especially for complex workflows."

More GitHub Actions cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Regarding cost, as an enterprise, we negotiate our license and expenses, so I can't provide a specific rating for that."

"The product is slightly more expensive than some alternatives."

"It is free and open platform, so I would rate it 1 out of 10."

"Price-wise, GitHub Actions is okay. If I want to use the product's advanced features, then I need to pay the licensing charges for the solution."

"The tool's price is okay and reasonable."

"For our basic usage, we didn't have to pay."

"It's low-priced. Not high, but definitely low."

"The cost for GitHub Actions may be around $45 dollars per user."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,089 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Legal Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	17

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudBees?

There are connection issues with CloudBees, specifically between Sybase and CloudBees. We often encounter connection problems, and there are issues with the pipelines.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudBees?

We use CloudBees for deploying the code in higher environments, such as QA, C2, staging, and production.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CloudBees?

I would recommend CloudBees to others because building jobs is much easier than with other solutions.

See all answers

What do you like most about GitHub Actions?

I have optimized job execution time by running test scripts in parallel and creating multiple pipelines; we've significantly reduced execution times. What could take 50 minutes can be cut down to j...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub Actions?

I would rate pricing a seven, which leans toward the expensive side. However, there is still value for money, and that's why we continue using it.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub Actions?

Frankly, I cannot imagine something that could be improved in GitHub Actions; there's a lot of capabilities, and the feature set is more advanced than we use. The pricing is high for the advanced s...

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs CloudBees

Compared 38% of the time

Harness vs CloudBees

Compared 24% of the time

Jenkins vs CloudBees

Compared 21% of the time

Digital.ai Release vs CloudBees

Compared 18% of the time

More CloudBees Competitors

Tekton vs GitHub Actions

Compared 29% of the time

Harness vs GitHub Actions

Compared 14% of the time

Bamboo vs GitHub Actions

Compared 10% of the time

TeamCity vs GitHub Actions

Compared 10% of the time

Buildkite vs GitHub Actions

Compared 6% of the time

More GitHub Actions Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudBees

October 2025

Download CloudBees product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Actions

September 2025

Download GitHub Actions product report

Overview

CloudBees provides a highly scalable and secure platform that supports seamless integration and automation across multiple environments. It excels in managing Jenkins instances and offers flexible deployment options, enhancing efficiency for large teams.

CloudBees is recognized for its integration with Jenkins, SonarQube, and Ansible, allowing companies to leverage its robust automation capabilities for continuous integration and deployment. With its strong support for Docker and Kubernetes, teams benefit from streamlined code management and operational efficiency. Its scalable architecture, real-time feedback, and premium vendor support help manage large-scale applications and microservices. Despite its strengths, users report challenges with pipeline setup, service availability, and GUI accessibility, which suggest room for improvement in these areas.

What are the key features of CloudBees?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies navigation and improves workflow efficiency.
Robust scalability: Supports growth and large-scale application management.
Advanced security: Ensures data security and compliance.
Integration capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with Jenkins, SonarQube, and Ansible.
Flexible deployment: Adapts to different infrastructure needs across environments.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Enhanced efficiency: Automation reduces manual workload.
Real-time feedback: Provides immediate insights into pipeline performance.
Vendor support: Offers assistance for troubleshooting and growth.
Scalable architecture: Accommodates business expansion requirements.

In tech and software industries, companies implement CloudBees for managing complex CI/CD pipelines. Its integration with DevOps tools facilitates automation and workflow optimization. Industries with large teams managing thousands of microservices use CloudBees to maintain high availability, streamline processes, and ensure security compliance, driving efficient production workflows.

CloudBees

GitHub Actions streamlines CI/CD processes with an intuitive YAML workflow and robust automation, enhancing efficiency and integration with third-party tools and cloud providers.

GitHub Actions automates development pipelines, supports scalable public and private runners, and manages secure secrets. This tool integrates seamlessly with platforms like AWS, Kubernetes, Google Cloud, and Databricks. It enhances DevOps workflows with reliable task automation. Users note areas for UI and deployment tool improvements, artifact management simplification, and additional programming language support. Debugging complexity and hosting agent transitions pose challenges, along with integration enhancements for tools like OneDrive.

What are GitHub Actions' key features?

YAML Workflow Creation: Simplifies configuration with intuitive YAML.
CI/CD Integration: Provides seamless integration within DevOps pipelines.
Automation Capabilities: Automates tasks with minimal manual intervention.
Third-Party Tool Compatibility: Works well with diverse tools and platforms.
Secure Secrets Management: Protects sensitive information effectively.

What benefits do users find in GitHub Actions?

Enhanced Performance: Boosts task execution speed and reliability.
Scalability: Supports growth with flexible runner options.
Improved Release Cycles: Ensures consistent updates and deployments.
Workflow Efficiency: Reduces manual tasks, increasing operational efficiency.

Companies in tech and software development frequently utilize GitHub Actions for integrating, deploying, and versioning projects. It is often employed for deploying applications to cloud environments like AWS and Kubernetes, managing extensive CI/CD workflows, and automating test and security operations, thereby streamlining production cycles across industries.

GitHub

Sample Customers

Capital One, PEGA, vistaprint, HSBC, BOSCH, Starbucks Coffee

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

CloudBees vs. GitHub Actions

September 2025

Free Report: CloudBees vs. GitHub Actions

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudBees vs. GitHub Actions and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,089 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudBees vs. GitHub Actions report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.